I said comparing the stats as they stand is unfair, never did I say they didn't matter. You continued to attempt to shove stats down my throat, again, that are disingenuous to use because of the large discrepancy between the two players in NHL games played. The stats matter, they matter when they are even all things considered. Otherwise you are trying to project and use numbers without any basis in reality. You know damn well if I were to extrapolate stats for Moore based on a small sample size and claim his production is better than DZ (like this season so far for instance) I would be burned at the stake. So why is okay to do the opposite?
Yeah, you would be burned at the stake. Largely because you seem to think comparing players based on a 6-game sample is the same thing as comparing players based on more than 100 games played. I have no idea how to even respond to that.
You also cannot just look at stats alone. What will Moore's game look like along the way? Will he be more consistent than Del Zotto, will he be better on both sides of the puck? Will he see PK time? Even if he doesn't match DZ's offensive production in 250 games, it will not tell the whole story. Again, we will see.
In general, I would agree with this, but the argument people keep making is that Del Zotto should be traded because A- he can't get shots on goal and B- because John Moore is apparently going to replace him. Del Zotto has put more shots on goal during the games that they have both been Rangers, and you can't say that a player (Moore) is going to replace another player's (MDZ) production, and then say that you have to ignore...the (lack of) production.
You can also stop with the 23 crap and putting more words in my mouth. I never said a 23 year old cannot improve. I said HOW MUCH WILL HE IMPROVE? I also said it was possible that some players hit ceilings by 23, not that either of the two in question have or will.
No, I don't think I will stop with the 23 "crap." It isn't crap just because it's true and you don't want it to be. Also, one of the reasons I keep bringing it up is because the same people LOVE to say Del Zotto has hit his ceiling and Moore will develop into a player he's never shown himself to be. Claiming that Del Zotto won't get better and that Moore will develop into a top pair guy is ABSURD when they are the same age.
Yeah it should, it should tell you that John Moore is still new to the team and MDZ was an established 4 year "vet." He is testing the water with Moore and AV has not yet even begun to leave his fingerprints on this team. The amount of ice time Moore received last night says little to nothing in how AV sees him. I guess I should argue that because he gave Moore first line PP minutes that means he obviously trusts him as the new PPQB.
This is a massive reach and you know it. Why did Fast get a spot over Kreider or Powe? The latter two have more of a track record than Fast. Moore and Del Zotto have the exact same history with AV, and it's pretty clear who AV sees as the better defenseman. And again, my point wasn't even about head to head TOI (which MDZ wins), but about the fact that, without MDZ playing, Moore still didn't get that ice time. When a coach shortens his bench rather than promoting a player, that has nothing to do with a player "not having fingerprints" in a team (itself a ridiculous claim. This isn't a rookie here. Moore is 22 years old with more than 100 NHL games).
Not even close, that goes to Brassard and Dorsett. Moore has gotten little praise and assumptions of what he will be in NY compared to the other players.
I don't see all that much love for Dorsett (the exact opposite, actually). As for Brassard, if people were saying that we should trade Stepan because Brassard will take the spot soon anyways, then you would have a point.
People see in Moore what they want/hope to see. That's not a good thing, because it's just going to make you all hate him when he ends up being what he actually is.