John Moore is better, and AV wants Falk in the lineup to add some grit. Thats why DZ sits.
In no universe is Moore a better player right now than Del Zotto
Moore had been nothing short of god awful for the vast majority of this season
John Moore is better, and AV wants Falk in the lineup to add some grit. Thats why DZ sits.
In no universe is Moore a better player right now than Del Zotto
Moore had been nothing short of god awful for the vast majority of this season
Falk looked like he really wanted a job tonight. He's a very good skater for a big guy. He also provides some toughness.
The majority? I don't know about that...
After yesterday's shutout...
Will Av's send DZ another message tonight and scratch him again?
I cant see any changes to the defense after a shutout. I thought Falk played well last night - added some much needed grit to the back end.
John Moore is a wonderful skater, but he still has a ton to learn when it comes to playing defense. Hes scary out there at times.
After yesterday's shutout...
Will Av's send DZ another message tonight and scratch him again?
For some reason or another it's like AV has decided that DZ is going to be a right side defenseman. He could have as easily taken Moore out and put DZ on the left side but he didn't. DZ is a disaster waiting to happen on the right side IMO. I don't like him there. I was a bit skeptical about Falk on the right side but considering now that he's a pretty good skater for a big guy and that was his first game in a long while he did really well. He looked fairly comfortable. He was a lot more forceful moving guys away from our goalie than the usual. He kept a lot of plays alive in the offensive end even though he was on his backhand a lot.
This is the third time this season that DZ has been scratched--not Moore. We can only speculate why AV chooses him and not Moore? DZ has not been providing much offensively which is his bread and butter. Playing the wrong side I wouldn't think helps that. Moore is bigger and a better skater. Both are relatively the same age but Moore seems to have more potential at this point. Del Zotto's overall game has not been growing and on his wrong side it seems to me to have regressed. If AV has in mind for him to step up and out of his comfort zone it's apparently not been working to his satisfaction. Players have to find their niche within any team. AV seems to be telling DZ what his niche is going to be and it's 3rd pairing right side and DZ's struggling to fit in.
He’s in my estimation trying hard and working on different aspects of his game but, at this time, I’ve been told there’s more to his game than what I’ve seen and we need that from him,†Vigneault said. “We feel tonight we need to make a change there and we’re hoping he’ll react the same way (Mats) Zuccarello did. Zucc was fighting it a little bit and he took it upon himself to get his game where we need it to be and he’s been one of our better players the last six or seven games. Hopefully Michael will react the same way. What I’ve been told he is as a player I’ll be able to see on a more consistent basis.â€
But is Del Zotto running out of chances with the Rangers?
“It’s a long season, we’re not even at the 20-game mark,†Vigneault said. “But I’ve been told he’s a better player than what I’ve seen and our group needs that.â€
From what AV said (it's in Ranger Rants yesterday), it's more about expectations:
Doesn't seem like he has the higher expectations for Moore. It's really too bad Del Zotto is the one who's been stuck playing out of position.
Probably back in the lineup on the right side on tuesday.
From what AV said (it's in Ranger Rants yesterday), it's more about expectations:
Doesn't seem like he has the higher expectations for Moore. It's really too bad Del Zotto is the one who's been stuck playing out of position.
Thanks for this site -31-. Amending my previous data to now include ALL situations and for players with at least 48 attempts (now I have only 96 players instead of 127? Not sure how that is unless either I filtered something wrong before or for some reason these sites have different data [maybe they had different filters based on showing players based on games played or TOI] but in any case it won't change the conclusions - just the sample)
1. Hunwick 82.6% (69 attempts 57 on goal)
96. Hamhuis 59.4 (105 attempts 62 on goal)
26. Stralman 73.3% (90 attempts 66 on goal)
41. McDonagh 70.1% (117 attempts 83 on goal)
78. Del Zotto 66.3% (122 attempts 81 on goal)
84. Girardi 63.8% (127 attempts 81 on goal)
Average: 69.8% (10240 attempts 7147 on goal)
The only conclusion I can make here is it looks like DZ really struggles with his shot on the powerplay while at even strength he is relatively fine. Hard to say much based on only 32 PP attempts (maybe slightly less due to possible shorthanded attempts) Unfortunately extraskater doesn't have data prior to last year so I can't go check his whole career
Edit: Difference in sample size is because extraskater filters for min 36 games last year.
Sure
For all situations from last season:
Pietrangelo: 62% (150 attempts 93 on goal)
Byfuglien: 71.2% (198 attempts 142 on goal)
Doughty: 67.5% (169 attempts 114 on goal)
Subban:: 75% (168 attempts 128 on goal)
One thing to note is these guys shoot A LOT more. Obviously do not take this data as 100% accurate and meaningful because it's still small sample size but it's the best we have to work with. It's just numbers reflecting what happened last year not showing what will happen.
For ease you can get all the data here: http://www.extraskater.com/players/s...=D&season=2012 Just take FF and Shots and do Shots/FF for shot on goal%.
He’s in my estimation trying hard and working on different aspects of his game but, at this time, I’ve been told there’s more to his game than what I’ve seen and we need that from him,†Vigneault said.
It makes more sense to have MDZ on his off side, as he is a lot more experienced than Moore and should therefore adjust easier. I played both sides. IMHO, the switch, when needed, is not uber difficult. Yes, it's a tad weird initially, but a player should get a feel for it in a handful of games and then slowly settle in. If they don't, I almost think it's more mental.
Psychologically, I like AV's approach. When you set a high expectation on someone you can really see what they're made of deep down. People with successful, positive, winning attitudes tend to take it as a challenge and fight tooth and nail to rise to the challenge. People with an opposite inner mindset tend to wilt in that situation. It may seem harsh, or whatever, but how MDZ responds can be telling in terms of what his mental constitution is. MZA and Kreider were docked. Neither made excuses. They manned up on it, and both took the reigns and picked their games up.
AV's methods are interesting. If your cream isn't rising to the expected level, he pours another cup. If your cream then rises to the right level, you play. If not, he dumps you in the sink again and lets you re-think things. The old saying, 'under pressure some men break, some break records' seems to be the mindset to some degree. But we had some guys who were sat, didn't like the taste of it, took ownership of it, and came back with a purpose. Whether MDZ does this or not is entirely up to him.
I disagree--hockey players in the NHL have problems all the time when they are shifted away from their normal position. We've all seen it. There's very little room for error in the NHL and going against what's natural for a player can mean there is a large difference in production and level of play. Del Zotto wasn't moved over because it put in a better position to succeed, he got moved because the organization lacks the proper player to put in that position. This experiment has been going on since last season and it's not working up to this point.
As for AV's methods--it would be nice to see it done consistantly--John Moore has played erratically, Pouliot is wandering around aimlessly game after game--the only thing he's in the top 2 on the team is penalty minutes.