Tuna99
Registered User
- Sep 26, 2009
- 15,876
- 7,840
let’s target the Bluejackets game Sunday April 6, all lined up for a great event. It’s on a Sunday so makes sense to our biological clock that wants canned beer and dirty wings on a Sunday at 3pm because it’s a 5pm game start so lots of light, in the playoff run, weekend, low attended game so the Sens could probably use the help, and we fans want it, and we deserve it, and there’s no good reason not to do it.Tailgating during the playoffs, I'd do. But for a Tues night game against SJ in Feb, not a chance.
Seems to me the ingredients for successful tailgating culture are the following;
a) weekend games
b) good weather
c) 1 to 4 o'clock starts
d) scarcity of games
The NHL games don't typically check a lot of those boxes, which is why it's less common.
That game has potential for all the ingredients (aside from scarcity, but with 82 games a year, you'll always have some saying, I'd do it next game and fail to hit that critical mass).let’s target the Bluejackets game Sunday April 6, all lined up for a great event. It’s on a Sunday so makes sense to our biological clock that wants canned beer and dirty wings on a Sunday at 3pm because it’s a 5pm game start so lots of light, in the playoff run, weekend, low attended game so the Sens could probably use the help, and we fans want it, and we deserve it, and there’s no good reason not to do it.
Charge $40 to park that day, Sens keeep some money for the cleanup, some money goes to charity, and it’s. win win win for everyone (this idea is so crazy I am proposing upping parking fees)
Thoughts?
That game has potential for all the ingredients (aside from scarcity, but with 82 games a year, you'll always have some saying, I'd do it next game and fail to hit that critical mass).
Be nice if it could be tied into Fan appreciation week, but that's the following week.
Liquor board has tailgate permits to license a public space, Sens are uniquely positioned with their arena in a cornfield to do this now. Maybe the only NHL team that could do it.Just out of curiosity, isn't one of the main cultural differences that allows this phenomenon to exist in the US the fact that alcohol consumption outside a licensed establishment is not a mortal sin there?
Just out of curiosity, isn't one of the main cultural differences that allows this phenomenon to exist in the US the fact that alcohol consumption outside a licensed establishment is not a mortal sin there?
Do they do much tailgating for NBA games? Seems more a Sunday afternoon nfl thing where stadiums have huge parking lots. Cant imagine it happening at MSG for example.
Sens have had beer gardens and food in the plaza out front during warm playoff days which was ok except still paying arena prices for beer. Im guessing it would just be one parking lot that you could pay extra for to set up BBQ's? Maybe lot 9 against the grass or something. I remember nearly getting frostbite once trying to find the car in lot 9 one cold wintery night. Maybe if they move downtown they could set up bbq parties on the aqueduct before games
Historical precedent. If public drinking had always been legal people would riot if the gov tried to change it to being illegal (See Kingdom, United).Yeah, I don't get this either.
Other places allow alcohol consumption in public places...no issues.
Why is it an issue here? Whether you chug a beer at home and then walk to a bar, or bring a beer on your walk, what is the difference in the governments eyes?
I guess back in the day when it was 90% bottle sales they could make the argument that people will smash bottles...but now it's all cans and plastic bottles...homeless people have proven that the area will be clear of empties...
What's the problem?
We have public shoot up sites...we can smoke weed outside in public...but we can sip on a beer can in public? So much for freedoms.
Historical precedent. If public drinking had always been legal people would riot if the gov tried to change it to being illegal (See Kingdom, United).
Same way that if guns were just invented today they would be immediately banned tomorrow. And people would unanimously agree with that decision.
Same way that people love karlsson until he's traded and then shit on him afterwards.
People have very illogical preferences and the inertia of the status quo is a motherf***er.
And for any economists in the forum...yes, that means 90% of the theory your discipline is based on is completely worthless.
I agree 100%.I get that, but we change laws all the time.
Weed was illegal until most people realized most people use weed no different than alcohol and that adults should be able to have freedoms...if adults brake other laws while intoxicated, they will take care of those, but you're free to simply smoke weed.
Drinking in public could lead to crime, but most people realize most people drinking alcohol in the streets will behave the same way they do in other situations when they have alcohol which is pretty tame. The bad apples that will commit crime will be dealt with.
I agree it's less harmful.I agree 100%.
But just look how long weed took. We don't change these laws all the time.
And weed is pretty obviously less harmful than alcohol.
I'm not saying they shouldn't change it. But I aint gonna hold my breath.
Historical precedent. If public drinking had always been legal people would riot if the gov tried to change it to being illegal (See Kingdom, United).
Same way that if guns were just invented today they would be immediately banned tomorrow. And people would unanimously agree with that decision.
Same way that people love karlsson until he's traded and then shit on him afterwards.
People have very illogical preferences and the inertia of the status quo is a motherf***er.
And for any economists in the forum...yes, that means 90% of the theory your discipline is based on is completely worthless.