WarriorofTime
Registered User
- Jul 3, 2010
- 33,158
- 23,368
I'm sure they'll be better when they play Sweden or Finland, sometimes these guys get a little bored with games that they come in knowing they should win easily and play sloppy.
Bedard's worst game. I have NO idea what he doing out there.
Yes. Good point.Pasche has been a game saver and fair to wonder where this game would be if he started. 3-3?
Well said.He looks awkward as shit trying to block shots waving around in front of the shooter. So many shots have got past him from the point.
Hmm, I often agree with you but I’m seeing a young player trying to figure out how to make a difference in the game & getting frustrated occasionally. I like seeing him continue to shoot whenever he gets in a scoring position.Bedard's worst game. I have NO idea what he doing out there.
The defensive problems have been there all tournament long though.I'm sure they'll be better when they play Sweden or Finland, sometimes these guys get a little bored with games that they come in knowing they should win easily and play sloppy.
We looked good in period one tonight, didn't we?Canada's last four periods have just been horrendous.
Not like this, tho. Even against better teams.The defensive problems have been there all tournament long though.
Based on this huge one game sample size, I think it’s safe to say that McDavid will still be the best Connor in the NHL.Now that line is being hemmed in again
Ha, ha.Based on this huge one game sample size, I think it’s safe to say that McDavid will still be the best Connor in the NHL.![]()
I don't think that was ever in doubt. Having said that, it's not a competition here, we just want Bedard to be as good as he can be to help the team win.Based on this huge one game sample size, I think it’s safe to say that McDavid will still be the best Connor in the NHL.![]()
Some of the first, I'd say.We looked good in period one tonight, didn't we?
True.Some of the first, I'd say.
But still, 4-2 aint great.