RobsonStreet
Registered User
- Jun 4, 2004
- 757
- 330
McAvoy, their youngest core player is 26. That doesn’t track with a world where Ullmark is too old.Who makes up this old core you speak of?
McAvoy, their youngest core player is 26. That doesn’t track with a world where Ullmark is too old.Who makes up this old core you speak of?
I apologize, maybe it makes sense to back track from time to time, sorry manRead what I was replying to.
PK is 100% right.
McAvoy, their youngest core player is 26. That doesn’t track with a world where Ullmark is too old.
Craig Robinson as the Bouncer in Knocked Up: I can't let you in cause you're old as f***. For this club, you know, not for the earth.26!
Better bring that old man outside and put him down. Yuck
If true, I guess there is a first time for everything.PK is 100% right.
Everything before the Bruins came out and said something that was in the media made Boston look cheap and bad. None of those rumors were obviously coming from Boston's side. Gross was trying to build up pressure on Boston through the Chiclets guys. Cool, well played.
Heading into a potential no contract on the first day of the season... you don't want to be the side with the fans against you.
So Boston let out their extremely extremely reasonable offer to shift the narrative. Of course them rounding up to 64m instead of down to 63m left Gross with a chance to call them all liars. That was a mistake. But them going to the media after Gross had been sneaky leaking to the media to drive the narrative is totally reasonable.
The Bruins aren't the Harry Sinden Bruins. Pasta, McAvoy, all the guys are fairly paid. 8x8 is fair for Swayman.
It's Swayman's camp wanting to stick to 8 years that is the problem here, really. It would be so much easier to agree on a 4x7 deal and let Swayman cash in again before he is 30 just like Helly and Saros did.
I disagree. He is free to try to get as much as he can. There is nothing wrong with him doing so.
So there’s nothing wrong with say, Fantilli sitting out because he wants $14m?I disagree. He is free to try to get as much as he can. There is nothing wrong with him doing so.
He is 100% correct. I'll never begrudge someone trying to get the most money they can for a job.
Reason number 3 if they agree on 64 I’ll say yes.Maybe Neely wasn't lying. Maybe he didn't offer 64 million but he sat down one night and decided to make a list of all the reasons he would be playing and he was able to think of 64 million reasons not related to money.
Reason number 1, I like the yellow on the jerseys, reason number 2.....
Ridiculous or wrong? It would be ridiculous but it wouldn't be wrong of him, just dumb.So there’s nothing wrong with say, Fantilli sitting out because he wants $14m?
You wouldn’t think that’s ridiculous?