GDT: SVK vs GER

[Chainshot]

Lol slovaks really good job, conceded and another 5-3 ... that was a very risky coach challenge and could cost them the game

I guess they thought him being in the crease would negate it. *shrug* He's there early.

 

[SoundAndFury]

Challenge which gives your opponents another 2 full minutes of 5v3.. Is it just me or that's dumb?

 

[tobu]

The German’s stick literally bent twice against the goalie, how’s that not interference?

 

[WhiskeyYerTheDevils]

Crazy risky challenge on a really iffy call.

edit: I'm a moron.

 

[Chainshot]

Someone remind Krueger that he's coaching against the Germans.

Crazy risky challenge on a really iffy call.

That's Craig Ramsay.

 

[WhiskeyYerTheDevils]

That's Craig Ramsay.

Oh damn I'm an idiot. Looked just like Krueger

 

[SoundAndFury]

The German’s stick literally bent twice against the goalie, how’s that not interference?

You are allowed to touch the goalie if you are fighting for a lost puck. Happen in goalmouth scrambles all the time. The focal point is if the puck's there.

 

[Boss Man Hughes]

Another nothing scores because an idiot Slovak defender had an easy clear and blew it.

 

[jj cale]

Beamer................2-0

Slovakia will really have to turn it on now, no time to waste.

 

[Chainshot]

And there is the doubling down costing the Slovaks.

 

[Boss Man Hughes]

You are allowed to touch the goalie if you are fighting for a lost puck. Happen in goalmouth scrambles all the time. The focal point is if the puck's there.

Which is all garbage. That means if you kick the goalies leg away and score it's a good goal .

 

[ozo]

Challenge which gives your opponents another 2 full minutes of 5v3.. Is it just me or that's dumb?

Bad game management for sure.

 

[elMatador]

double lol, Craig failed on his challenge and then Cehlarik failed to clear the zone

 

[Albatros]

The German’s stick literally bent twice against the goalie, how’s that not interference?

Wouldn't have been a mistake if it was called, but will a ref overturn his call when it's a 50/50 one to start with? It's a desperation challenge at a moment when they didn't need to be desperate.

 

[Antiillafire]

Game over. Why the f*** is Ceresnak on this team again?

 

[SoundAndFury]

which is all garbage.

In your unbiased opinion.

Wouldn't have been a mistake if it was called, but will a ref overturn his call when it's a 50/50 one to start with? It's a desperation challenge at a moment when they didn't need to be desperate.

Yeah just kill the rest of 5v4 and just play the game down one... 2 goals in these competitions is already huge.

 

[Chainshot]

In your unbiased opinion.

My sarcasm meter just broke.

 

[Antiillafire]

In your unbiased opinion.


Yeah just kill the rest of 5v4 and just play the game down one... 2 goals in these competitions is already huge.

Exactly this. Risk vs reward assessment here. And Slovak staff doesn’t think about that I guess…

 

[tobu]

You are allowed to touch the goalie if you are fighting for a lost puck. Happen in goalmouth scrambles all the time. The focal point is if the puck's there.

There is no such rule allowing it as you claim. Please cite rulebook. I just looked it up and this was clear impairment of goalie wanting to move in crease.

 

[My3Sons]

Oh damn I'm an idiot.

I think this is the important takeaway from this game.

 

[SoundAndFury]

There is no such rule allowing it as you claim. Please cite rulebook. I just looked it up and this was clear impairment of goalie wanting to move in crease.

Whacking a goalie while trying to get the puck isn't "a clear impairment". And that's why it's a goal. Because I'm not blind and neither are the refs. Stop your homer cope.

 

[Boss Man Hughes]

Bad game management for sure.

Not when it was pretty obviously goalie interference. I wouldn't bother to challenge now unless it was in desperation.

Whacking a goalie while trying to get the puck isn't "a clear impairment". And that's why it's a goal. Because I'm not blind and neither are the refs. Stop your homer cope.

There is no way to know if it prevented the goalie form getting in front of the puck.

 

[habsrule4eva3089]

Looks like that went off the back of Grubauer.

I was wondering how that shot went through that dman right in front lol

 

[tobu]

Whacking a goalie while trying to get the puck isn't "a clear impairment". And that's why it's a goal. Because I'm not blind and neither are the refs. Stop your homer cope.

Look I have agreed with calls against my team countless times but this is not it and you claiming a made up rule as something you are used to seeing does not validate it being correct. Stop your bs.

 

[jj cale]

new game...................fantastic, now it will get really good