CBJSlash
Registered User
Connaughton + Rychel + 1st could get a pretty good dman.
That's probably about as well as we could do right now.
That's probably about as well as we could do right now.
nobody is providing examples....
We just gave up 5 assets today, I'd prefer to hang on to some of our depth until training camp.
Eh... in my book we gave up 1 asset (if we sign Letestu).
Anisimov, Dano, Morin
for
Saad, Letestu (pending)
The rest are extras.
We just gave up 5 assets today, I'd prefer to hang on to some of our depth until training camp.
I'm ok with hanging back and seeing what shakes out with other teams.
Just saying I also don't think the cupboard is bare either from a depth or asset standpoint. Not advocating trades for trade sake there is still ammo there if needed.
agreed...i'm not drawing a line in the sand either way...just that FA usually ends up with overpaying and overterming an asset
Just wondering what you are willing to trade and which hole you will open up in order to do so. And he won't go for picks and prospects.
I wouldn't call Paliotta an extra.Eh... in my book we gave up 1 asset (if we sign Letestu).
Anisimov, Dano, Morin
for
Saad, Letestu (pending)
The rest are extras.
This!
Everyone clamoring for another trade isn't realizing what we just gave up...
Hartnell could/should be available, too. He's still got value and we need to move his contract if we want a serious upgrade on D.
Insert depth defenseman (Connaughton/Prout/Goloubef/Paliotta)
Rychel
Karlsson
Atkinson
Signed Calvert
Draft Picks
we have lots of assets left
I'm not sure who bangs the trade Atkinson drum more, you or Porty
I'm not eager to push him out either, but when I look at the contracts that we could/should move, Hartnell's is the one that catches my attention (outside of Clarkson, Bourque, Boll).I'm in no rush to push Hartnell out the door at all. He may not finish his contract here but dude played good last year. I like having some crafty, crusty vets in the mix. Can’t all be cheap kids.
David Pagnotta @TheFourthPeriod 31m31 minutes ago
Following @DennisTFP report, I too haven't heard LA in on Franson. Told Leafs, Jackets, Flames, Sharks, Oilers, among others, have inquired.
Well, being a RHD and under the age of 30 he's likely going to cost a lot.Yeah, sure. Why not?
Well, being a RHD and under the age of 30 he's likely going to cost a lot.
Ok? So? They have the cap space, the need, and now apparently one of the players they like.
I'm just giving a reason for why they wouldn't sign him. Jarmo has made it clear he doesn't want to overpay for players especially if they're not the perfect fit. I'm not denying the need we have, but that's how GMJK feels.Ok? So? They have the cap space, the need, and now apparently one of the players they like.
I don't think it's likely, but I sure as hell would take Franson on this team. There are other players I'd either want more or would fit better, but like I said, sure, why not?