2022 picks would be a much bigger part of a 2024 run then 2023 picks. a 17 year old Villeneuve is going to make a much bigger impact then a 16 year old from the 2023 draft.
Sudbury Wolves 2022 Off-season Thread
- Thread starter EON
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
- Status
cub
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2012
- 4,954
- 4,061
howlman
Registered User
- Mar 9, 2004
- 1,846
- 2,202
howlman
Registered User
- Mar 9, 2004
- 1,846
- 2,202
Delic Goyette Konyen
Musty Villeneuve Degrazia (OA)
Boudreau Larmand McCallum
Assadourian Pharand Derbidge
Holmes Kulonummi
Anania Collins
Hoover Mania
Costantini (OA)
Hrabal
Musty Villeneuve Degrazia (OA)
Boudreau Larmand McCallum
Assadourian Pharand Derbidge
Holmes Kulonummi
Anania Collins
Hoover Mania
Costantini (OA)
Hrabal
I Loveallsports
I'm a optimist not a optometrist
- Apr 13, 2010
- 5,518
- 4,411
Was looking at the other draft picks from last year. Nothing jumps out. But you might see more than one rookie on this team next season. Should be interesting. Not sure Derbridge is a lock.
Yes, but don't forget the trade part of this equation Players(older) and picks obtained which means trade bait for older key players.
I Loveallsports
I'm a optimist not a optometrist
- Apr 13, 2010
- 5,518
- 4,411
I Loveallsports
I'm a optimist not a optometrist
- Apr 13, 2010
- 5,518
- 4,411
Locals, Northerners could be called in OHL draft this week
OHL Priority Selection runs Friday and Saturday
www.thesudburystar.com
2022 OHL Priority Selection Mock Draft & Preview
The 2022 OHL Priority Selection is set to go this weekend, with rounds 1-3 occurring Friday night. The Saginaw Spirit will select first afte...
ohlprospects.blogspot.com
I wouldn’t be disappointed with this! I’d prefer Villeneuve, but the lack of high impact D on the roster makes this ok. Prefer this to rolling the dice on Hage.2022 OHL Priority Selection Mock Draft & Preview
The 2022 OHL Priority Selection is set to go this weekend, with rounds 1-3 occurring Friday night. The Saginaw Spirit will select first afte...
Wolfman Jack
Registered User
- Jan 19, 2009
- 3,412
- 2,741
I hope its Villeneuve. We just need that extra physicality up front that can also be a factor on the scoresheet. I just seem him as a Mason MacTavish type player IMO.2022 OHL Priority Selection Mock Draft & Preview
The 2022 OHL Priority Selection is set to go this weekend, with rounds 1-3 occurring Friday night. The Saginaw Spirit will select first afte...
WJ
cub
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2012
- 4,954
- 4,061
OHL DRAFT INFO, starts tonight at 7pm
ontariohockeyleague.com
Ontario Hockey League
The OHL consists of 20 member teams, including 17 in the province of Ontario as well as three in the United States, with two in the state of Michigan and one in the state of Pennsylvania.
ontariohockeyleague.com
I think it is pretty overwhelming that the majority of the fans on the board would like the Wolves to pick Villeneuve.Let's hope that Papineau and Head Scout Taylor are in agreement.A team should pick the best talent/player available at #3 in any draft.Don't overthink this Wolves brass it is a pick that will put more fans in the stands.
OHL draft 2022: Here’s what the top 20 picks could look like
The top 20 ranked prospects, and the order of selection, for this year’s draft, which starts Friday.
www.thestar.com
As much as I’d like to see the wolves pick for need, D and G (if one is worthy) with first two picks; I believe the pick will be Villenueve, and that the wolves can’t go wrong with the 3rd overall pick.
I just really hope the wolves manage to get one of the top 6-7 D selected, and/or I hope that all of Niagara, Miss, and (Barrie - D as well as a G) don't select a D prior to the wolves.
Last edited:
In an ideal world, the wolves come out of day one with a F, D, G in that order, but at the end of the day, I just want them to take the best player available.OHL draft 2022: Here’s what the top 20 picks could look like
The top 20 ranked prospects, and the order of selection, for this year’s draft, which starts Friday.
As much as I’d like to see the wolves pick for need, D and G (if one is worthy) with first two picks; I believe the pick will be Villenueve, and that the wolves can’t go wrong with the 3rd overall pick.
I just really hope the wolves manage to get one of the top 6-7 D selected, and/or I hope that all of Niagara, Miss, and (Barrie - D as well as a G) don't select a D prior to the wolves.
Wiserbud
Registered User
- Mar 29, 2014
- 389
- 432
I have to say I do enjoy this forum. In terms of the draft it is exciting, and what I enjoy is our speculation of who we will get. My arm chair scouting is based on a couple of videos developed purely for promoting the best moments of these players. I fully expect who we will get will be based on more evidence than that. 
I have full faith in our scouting considering what they have done in the last two drafts. I am very curious what happens with Hage, especially with his USHAL tender.I have to say I do enjoy this forum. In terms of the draft it is exciting, and what I enjoy is our speculation of who we will get. My arm chair scouting is based on a couple of videos developed purely for promoting the best moments of these players. I fully expect who we will get will be based on more evidence than that.
Totally agree. It seems like everybody has an opinion on who the wolves should take but how many have actually seen these kids play on more than one occasion? Yes I know that it's fun to guess at this time of year but some people seem to be obsessed and will legitimately be pissed if the wolves don't draft the player that they think should be drafted. Most seem to base their opinion on a few videos and scouting reports ( I get it, not much more we have to go on living up North) BUT even the scouting reports have conflicting info. For example OHLProspect states the Malcom Spence is ".... an elite playmaking forward that helps elevate his teammates performance" Yet in the Toronto Star link (which i'm sure scouts were consulted on) Spence is stated as "More of a finisher than a playmaker"I have to say I do enjoy this forum. In terms of the draft it is exciting, and what I enjoy is our speculation of who we will get. My arm chair scouting is based on a couple of videos developed purely for promoting the best moments of these players. I fully expect who we will get will be based on more evidence than that.
My point is, have fun, speculate, discuss, but don't be pissed and grill the organization if the player that you wanted isn't the one selected. That being said, put me in the column that hopes they draft Nathan Villeneuve
Like billoink said have faith in our scouts based on their recent success.BPA for sure. But I believe when it’s reasonably close, ie. choice of Drysdale or Clarke or Nelson or Allen and likely #3 F; and the team has not drafted anything resembling the top 5 D available in three drafts, pick for need so that a team can be built.
And right or wrong, I am concerned about what the rest of the central division gets as it seems the division will be very strong soon, for at least a few seasons.
Last edited:
We are, at least I am speculating based on an overwhelming consensus of what is the top 4-5 BPA.Totally agree. It seems like everybody has an opinion on who the wolves should take but how many have actually seen these kids play on more than one occasion? Yes I know that it's fun to guess at this time of year but some people seem to be obsessed and will legitimately be pissed if the wolves don't draft the player that they think should be drafted. Most seem to base their opinion on a few videos and scouting reports ( I get it, not much more we have to go on living up North) BUT even the scouting reports have conflicting info. For example OHLProspect states the Malcom Spence is ".... an elite playmaking forward that helps elevate his teammates performance" Yet in the Toronto Star link (which i'm sure scouts were consulted on) Spence is stated as "More of a finisher than a playmaker"
My point is, have fun, speculate, discuss, but don't be pissed and grill the organization if the player that you wanted isn't the one selected. That being said, put me in the column that hopes they draft Nathan Villeneuve
ohloutsider
Registered User
Ya the on-line videos only show the good stuff. They never post videos of a players bad moments. Trust your GM has seen both.Totally agree. It seems like everybody has an opinion on who the wolves should take but how many have actually seen these kids play on more than one occasion? Yes I know that it's fun to guess at this time of year but some people seem to be obsessed and will legitimately be pissed if the wolves don't draft the player that they think should be drafted. Most seem to base their opinion on a few videos and scouting reports ( I get it, not much more we have to go on living up North) BUT even the scouting reports have conflicting info. For example OHLProspect states the Malcom Spence is ".... an elite playmaking forward that helps elevate his teammates performance" Yet in the Toronto Star link (which i'm sure scouts were consulted on) Spence is stated as "More of a finisher than a playmaker"
My point is, have fun, speculate, discuss, but don't be pissed and grill the organization if the player that you wanted isn't the one selected. That being said, put me in the column that hopes they draft Nathan Villeneuve
Andrew Gaulton as mentioned above could be the best goalie available, like hips, stats don't lie
hockeynorth
Registered User
- Aug 31, 2017
- 12,650
- 6,439
- Status
