Stutzle goal called off due to “interference”

[zappa4ever]

Unacceptable
Offensive
Seriously...



what idiot is playing Macarena?

 

[dirtydanglez]

brutal call

 

[Golden_Jet]

Ok but that doesn't mean the Sens need to make brainless self-inflicted mistakes to exacerbate the situation.

That line change was a completely valid penalty and took the game from 1-1 to 3-1. That’s not on the officials.

it’s not a 5 on 3 otherwise,
that was a brutal refereed game.

 

[tarheelhockey]

it’s not a 5 on 3 otherwise,
that was a brutal refereed game.

It’s not a 5 on 3 if they make a legal line change.

There were 8 seconds left in the initial penalty. If they don’t brain-fart into a second call, we’re back to even strength and the game moves on at 1-1.

Blaming the refs for two goals that followed from an indisputable penalty is wild. Those goals are on the coach and the player who decided to jump onto the ice before his man was anywhere near the bench.

 

[The Crypto Guy]

I was legitimately stunned this was called interference, as I thought interference was basically only body checking someone without the puck... but TIL the following is in the NHL rulebook under the Interference rule.



That said it's still a shit call. Stutzle is merely trying to avoid and counter the sticklift and tieup by the defender by repositioning his stick.

If the ref was smart, he would have made no call and signaled for a review/talk to the other officials so they could talk about it and what everyone saw. Once he called a penalty, that made the play dead and the goal/whole play unreviewable, i believe.

Sure. If he wanted to make up his own rules.

That is not reviewable lol

 

[DarrylshutzSydor]

He slashed the guys stick out of his hands?

 

[volcom92886]

Soft call, but it is a penalty according to the rule books. Cant slash a players stick who is not involved in the play, also cant propel a stick an opponent's stick away from them.

 

[Golden_Jet]

It’s not a 5 on 3 if they make a legal line change.

There were 8 seconds left in the initial penalty. If they don’t brain-fart into a second call, we’re back to even strength and the game moves on at 1-1.

Blaming the refs for two goals that followed from an indisputable penalty is wild. Those goals are on the coach and the player who decided to jump onto the ice before his man was anywhere near the bench.

Wrong it’s not a 5 on 3, if not for the Brutal call on Pinto. The too many men was the right call. Should of been 5 on 4.

 

[AhosDatsyukian]

This should never in any world be a penalty, however the refs tend to call it when a player comes down over the top on another guy’s stick and knocks it out of his hands, especially near the net like that. It shouldn’t be a penalty but the way the league calls it, it’s not surprising

 

[Golden_Jet]

Soft call, but it is a penalty according to the rule books. Cant slash a players stick who is not involved in the play, also cant propel a stick an opponent's stick away from them.

Correct Svech wasn’t involved in the play, he wasn’t even close enough to give Stutzle a 2 hand slash, he couldn’t even reach him, extending with one hand on the stick.

Refs should be fined for the that brutal reffed game.. That was worse than IHHF reffing.

 

[DarrylshutzSydor]

Correct Svech wasn’t involved in the play, he wasn’t even close enough to give Stutzle a 2 hand slash, he couldn’t even reach him, extending with one hand on the stick.

Refs should be fined for the that brutal reffed game..

ahh, but Svech could have maybe stopped the pass. Penalty.

 

[volcom92886]

Correct Svech wasn’t involved in the play, he wasn’t even close enough to give Stutzle a 2 hand slash, he couldn’t even reach him, extending with one hand on the stick.

Refs should be fined for the that brutal reffed game..

At the time of the slash, the puck was not in the vicinity of Stutzle, therefore it was away from the play.

 

[Golden_Jet]

ahh, but Svech could have maybe stopped the pass. Penalty.

He wasn’t even close enough for that, you’re not stopping a pass, with your stick 3-4 in the air, extending with one hand on the stick,
and not close enough to the player to intercept pass.

 

[BLONG7]

There have been, a lot of soft slashing calls recently.................seems like the league has asked refs to call more often??

Players as a rule now almost never hold their sticks tightly because they weigh next to nothing.

 

[Washed Up 29YearOld]

They should just retroactively count that. That goal was beautiful.

 

[tarheelhockey]

Wrong it’s not a 5 on 3, if not for the Brutal call on Pinto. The too many men was the right call. Should of been 5 on 4.

Again they’re 8 seconds from going back to even strength, Canes had already transitioned back to their 5v5 line rotation. The Pinto penalty was over. Sens make an inexcusable blunder on the line change which keeps the faceoff in their zone, then give up the 5v3 goal seconds later which keeps them on the TMM penalty kill, then give up another goal on that penalty kill.

Bad calls are gonna happen. Canes also had a phantom penalty in the 1st period (which hasn’t been mentioned in this thread yet). Going on an unearned PK doesn’t give the victimized team an excuse to melt down mentally and defensively.

 

[Knave]

Again they’re 8 seconds from going back to even strength, Canes had already transitioned back to their 5v5 line rotation. The Pinto penalty was over. Sens make an inexcusable blunder on the line change which keeps the faceoff in their zone, then give up the 5v3 goal seconds later which keeps them on the TMM penalty kill, then give up another goal on that penalty kill.

Bad calls are gonna happen. Canes also had a phantom penalty in the 1st period (which hasn’t been mentioned in this thread yet). Going on an unearned PK doesn’t give the victimized team an excuse to melt down mentally and defensively.

A whole call? Woweee! I'm a dog parent, btw. It's just like having an actual kid.

 

[Gregor Samsa]

What if Stutzle dropped his stick too? What if there were 2 sticks on the ice? What do the refs call there?

 

[MCR74]

Wonderful.

 

[chaz4hockey]

I'd add, there were a bunch of calls that Canes fans crabbed about last night too.

Controversial statement but:

Probably a makeup call for the unbelievably bad call on Orlov when he clean checked Stützle in the first (and of course Stützle made the most of it).

Sorry, Sens fans but Stützle has a reputation of being a diver.

btw: some context to the Pinto penalty. Sens had made a point of knocking into Martin a few times just before that & I viewed that call as a message to the Sens to cut it out.

 

[gach]

https://x.com/i/web/status/1857958988685414833

Can anyone make sense of this? Can players just stop 2-on-1’s by dropping their sticks now?

Refs don't see a play and then make a call on what they think happened. It happens alot

 

[CornerStone61]

I'd add, there were a bunch of calls that Canes fans crabbed about last night too.

Controversial statement but:

Probably a makeup call for the unbelievably bad call on Orlov when he clean checked Stützle in the first (and of course Stützle made the most of it).

Sorry, Sens fans but Stützle has a reputation of being a diver.

btw: some context to the Pinto penalty. Sens had made a point of knocking into Martin a few times just before that & I viewed that call as a message to the Sens to cut it out.

The orlov call was bad, but those types of bad calls happen almost every game. The call on Stutzle was absolutely brutal and in no way comparable. Pinto literally slashed the ice, regardless of the exchange between Martin and the ref, if they wanted to make a point to the Sens they could've called something weak that actually could be construed as a penalty, there was plenty of stick work in that game. Justifying the Pinto call is blind homerism.

 

[Fatass]

ahh, but Svech could have maybe stopped the pass. Penalty.

Exactly! Stutzle chopped down on Svechnikov’s stick which allowed him yo get the puck. It’s actually quick thinking by Stutzle to try that move. It worked too. It’s just in that situation the refs will absolutely call it a penalty. They have to; it resulted in a goal.

 

[Golden_Jet]

btw: some context to the Pinto penalty. Sens had made a point of knocking into Martin a few times just before that & I viewed that call as a message to the Sens to cut it out.

Ahhh got it, so refs give Pinto a penalty for something he never did.

 

[Fripp]

That's been a penalty call all season. Sorry.