Ducks in a row
Go Ducks Quack Quack
Stoner contract is $3,250,000 each season through 2017-18
Would anyone be willing to take this?
Would anyone be willing to take this?
Sure for lupul
Chicago had to give up TT to get rid of one year of Bickell at an average just 750k more than Stoner's. Nobody is touching multiple years of that contract for a #6/7 defensman for just a third round pick.
Chicago had to give up TT to get rid of one year of Bickell at an average just 750k more than Stoner's. Nobody is touching multiple years of that contract for a #6/7 defensman for just a third round pick.
It's two seasons - this one and next. The Ducks may be able to retain half a million too. We did for Maroon, so it could be an option.
Since when is Lupul a 7th round pick or future considerations? Ducks are looking to unload Stoner without taking a player back.
yeah bro. I'm sure they are.
Yea we could retain a small amount. A veteran 3rd pair physical defenseman isn't so bad for a team to add.
Stoner > Bickell. At least Stoner is a NHL quality defenseman still unlike Bickell who was so bad with Chicago this past season that they sent him to the AHL. Stoner is only slightly overpayed Bickell is totally overpayed.
What is so funny? Your acting like Stoner totally sucks he is a decent 3rd pair defenseman just a little overpayed and we could retain a small amount we shouldn't need to take another player back.
He's a #6 defensman. He's not slightly overpaid, he's overpaid by several millions. He should be making 33% of his current salary, that's not "slightly." If a team wants that, they can pick up a superior Kyle Quincey for cheap, or get Russel who's significantly better, etc. If you want other comparables, Schenn is making two million less, and Schultz is basically making two million less. Any team who wanted a bottom pairing defender could have had one of them, and there are still others, as I mentioned above, who will be cheaper and better. Demers, who got the biggest defense contract in FA and who is vastly better, is making 1.25 more only. Think about that. Stoner's deal is terrible, it can't be reconciled. If a team was willing to take him, I think it would have already happened. Everyone has their rosters basically set, there are other defenders available in FA for less money to plug gaps / PTO's, and I doubt anyone is in a rush to help Anaheim be better.
So then if you think he is so much overpayed what would you think it would take for Ducks to get rid of him? Don't say we would have to take back someone who has a terrible contract that makes more.
the team has to pay him this year and next year. Its going to take a valuable asset.
He's a #6 defensman. He's not slightly overpaid, he's overpaid by several millions. He should be making 33% of his current salary, that's not "slightly." If a team wants that, they can pick up a superior Kyle Quincey for cheap, or get Russel who's significantly better, etc. If you want other comparables, Schenn is making two million less, and Schultz is basically making two million less. Any team who wanted a bottom pairing defender could have had one of them, and there are still others, as I mentioned above, who will be cheaper and better. Demers, who got the biggest defense contract in FA and who is vastly better, is making 1.25 more only. Think about that. Stoner's deal is terrible, it can't be reconciled. If a team was willing to take him, I think it would have already happened. Everyone has their rosters basically set, there are other defenders available in FA for less money to plug gaps / PTO's, and I doubt anyone is in a rush to help Anaheim be better.
The Bickell deal is the standard. It might take something like a stoner and a larsson for a 3rd type deal. Ducks are in a tough spot
The Bickell deal is the standard. It might take something like a stoner and a larsson for a 3rd type deal. Ducks are in a tough spot
There will be a bunch of I'll advised posts in this thread claiming Stoner is garbage - he isn't. He's a very steady, physical bottom pairing guy who happens to be paid about 750k - 1M more than he should.
He was a great fit as a partner for Vatanen while the latter was getting his feet under him at the NHL level and the two often took on upwards of 20 mins per game.
If a team has the cap space, and has a young puck mover in need of some insulation on their third pair, this is the perfect fit. As a bonus they likely get paid some sort of solid asset to take him on due to the contract.
Once again, if you're coming into this thread to make a generic comment about Stoner being bad, you're just telling me you haven't watched him play. He's been exactly as advertised when the Ducks signed him.
I'd do that in a heartbeat, granted I'm not as high on Larsson as others are.