The Gloaming
23
I'm glad to see team USA looked at the last 4 years of play, and not the last 30 games.
Well then that would REALLY not explain the Ryan omission.
I'm glad to see team USA looked at the last 4 years of play, and not the last 30 games.
Do you guys think that taking the college route might hurt Hags' chances at team Sweden?
Well then that would REALLY not explain the Ryan omission.
Do you guys think that taking the college route might hurt Hags' chances at team Sweden?
Why would it?
Which is why you should take BPA every time when drafting 18-19 year old players. Fowler would easily be at least the team's 2nd best defender this season with the dynamic season he's having with the best team in the NHL. Oh well.
I'm sure McIlrath is a very tough guy though.
No he wouldn't. Girardi is a better player than Fowler, and I don't think its even debatable.
Fowler has been a lot better than Girardi has this year
I still like the McIlrath pick but Fowler is really, really good
The Rangers don't really have any use for Fowler though. He is a lefty shot. We already have McDonagh And Staal on the left as the first and 2nd pair d-man. DelZaster, Moore, Allen and Falk are also all lefty shots.
Fowler just wouldn't fit with the team, too many lefty shots. You could always just trade DelZaster and Staal, but McIlrath will be a good defender for the Rangers and is a righty shot. He is probably just as valuable to the Rangers as Fowler would be. Not that he is a better player, but McIlrath is a player the Rangers will need since the team only has two current righty shots.
No he wouldn't. Girardi is a better player than Fowler, and I don't think its even debatable.
The way fowler is playing this year, he would be the one making everyone outside of McD redundant. Not the other way around.
If he wasn't pleased with Ryan's intensity, then Burke may be in for a rude awakening if Callahan and Stepan continue their uninspired play into the Olympics. Kessel's another player whose had his intensity level questioned in the past.
Actually it would, because Ryan was underwhelming in the shortened year and his 11-12 season was nothing spectacular either. It's not like we left off Patty Kane, here, folks, Ryan has some legit question marks to his game.
Yeah, I personally think Orpik is a pretty terrible pick. Martin I'm ok with, however.I'm a little nervous about Brooks Orpik but we'll see.
Grit, Jam, Swagger, Savvy, Leadership, Machismo, Balls.What does Orpik even do good enough at this age to be considered for selection? I'm really at a loss.
What does Orpik even do good enough at this age to be considered for selection? I'm really at a loss.
Actually it would, because Ryan was underwhelming in the shortened year and his 11-12 season was nothing spectacular either. It's not like we left off Patty Kane, here, folks, Ryan has some legit question marks to his game.
Grit, Jam, Swagger, Savvy, Leadership, Machismo, Balls.
Folks, lol
He's not Patty Kane, but he's a better ALL-AROUND goal scorer than everyone but Kane, and arguably Kessel. (Kessel and Ryan are just different players to me.)
It's a big risk, and the "questions" are overblown. This reeks of something personal. It's not like he was so bad in 2010 that his commitment and drive left something to be desired. The part of his game being questioned is not a part of the game a player just drops out of nowhere. He's the same player he was in 2010, and while they're trying to sell you this idea of having much harder roster choices this time around, that's really only true of the defense.