Great post, and I agree...what's your idea of a stricter and more disciplined approach? Fortnite Friday Nights with Cheetos and Pepsi for the team?
I think Shanahan brought some of that collective organizational respect to the team with Legends Row and retiring jerseys for past Leaf icons, but Dubas is not like Lou, and seems too easy going and friendly with the players...he oozes a sense of coddling players, and I'm not sure that helps in some ways.
Detroit like Toronto lost its sense of continuity as mediocrity became commonplace. Once success returned to Detroit, the bridge linking their decorated past to their successful (then) present was a natural process and in turn, exorcised the dash between the two eras.
What Shanahan did was take the initial steps to reconnect this same sense of heritage, which as we all know, was very successful, but just as important, full of integrity and clear purpose. Sounds saccharine to say given that it should be clear to a hockey player in the NHL that their purpose is to compete and contend for the Stanley Cup.
But what this club has been through post-1967 has been a clear cycle of forced instability. Say what anyone will about Shanahan's loyalty to Dubas, I'd wager the primary building block under the Shanahan -- if it had a name inscribed on it -- is Stability. I wouldn't be surprised if Shanahan looked at David Poile and Lou Lamoriello as examples and determined that come what may, the first step in establishing a new culture is to ensure as little change as is needed. To repeat: Come what may.
I think he's been right for the most part. But I think he's reached his limit with this season. I don't think it's a coincidence that his absence is noticeable. I think the distance is measured in anticipation of difficult change. And I think having experienced Scotty Bowman and Lou Lamoriello and having invested in Dubas, I believe that Dubas has changed and will continue to past this season.
It's interesting that Maloney (Calgary) cited a shift in culture in moving out Sutter, somewhat alluding to the difference in players "these days". Maybe I'm reading things incorrectly, but I think there's a different sea change that's going to happen in Toronto.
The logic lays out that our management adapted to players "these days" very early in routing out Babcock and deferring to Dubas as a novice with novel ideas and relationship dynamics. We can hardly move laterally and expect a different result. Now this is all predicated on the presumption that we're a hockey club. If we're simply the NHL's underwriters then I don't expect a thing to change.
But it's apparent to any billion dollar enterprise paying attention to its fans there is only one meaningful direction to take this club, and that's back on the path Shanahan envisioned with heritage, a taskmaster like Lou Lamoriello and perhaps as much of an anonymity as the Leafs could ever muster in order to continue to change a culture that seems defined by its reliance to hold on to cross-purposes like no other sports culture.
As far as approach in implementing a more disciplined approach....Dividends from the league's highest paid sports psychology/amateur scouting departments is a good first step. Maybe its already incoming.
But we all know the next steps on the pro-side. Easier said then done. My repeated proposal is to negotiate with Nylander first, make his contract the bar, and negotiate with the others from there. If they accept the model, great, if they don't, depth comes in, our cap space increases and we operate as though it is no longer possible to hold our management hostage to imprudent decisions.
Can't really comment on hobbies bleeding into the job, but as noted, if our scouts can confirm that there are other prospects in the system that see hockey as the hobby, then that should be an easy filter.
That and perhaps a bi-weekly visit to Sick Kids to put things in perspective.