TSN: Stamkos meeting with leafs, Toronto mayor, and CEO of Canadian tire

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expeting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.
Status
Not open for further replies.
No they can't.

But they can be punished if they are the ones (or if they give the appearance that they are the ones) that organized him being paid more.. or if what he's being paid is not considered fair value for his services (i.e. it's too much).
Why even pretend to know anything about this. These multi billion dollar corporations have their lawyers telling them it's ok to do.
 
No they can't.

But they can be punished if they are the ones (or if they give the appearance that they are the ones) that organized him being paid more.. or if what he's being paid is not considered fair value for his services (i.e. it's too much).


Which would be extremely hard to prove. The Leafs would most likely have to be caught putting money into Canadian Tire somehow. Until that happens the Leafs can't make financial decisions for the Canadian Tire group.
 
One advantage Canadian teams have with signing players is Canadian Tire money. Detroit and Buffalo never stood a chance.
 
df90c7f197dd25df60f8ba751eb455cf.jpg


It's this guy, right?
 
Is this legit? The mayor is there to offer him a subway line named after him? So you gonna have something called the stamkos expressway or something? What's gonna happen when it crashes and goes off the rails?

LOL at some of these things... man, it's steven stamkos for gods sake, not crosby or someone with a bit more of a pedigree.

The mayor, fwiw, is the former CEO of Rogers.
 
Folks, the league isn't all powerful, and honestly doesn't care. The union will grieve at any attempt to prevent a player from getting an endorsement deal. Endorsements are legal within the CBA. Capped leagues discuss business opportunities in the city. The Lakers did this with Aldridge last year. The league doesn't actually give a **** about parity, they're trying to keep expenses low. The biggest drivers of the cap were Snider and Jacobs, who invented cap circumvention.

Literally nothing about this is illegal, or even all that unusual. Players generally meet executives of the companies that give them endorsement deals through teams those companies sponsor. Seriously guys, the NHL can't stop another company from paying him.

Lol what? There's a whole ****ing section in the CBA devoted to exactly this.
 
There's been talk about this supplemented income and that it's already been vetted by the NHL and lawyers. Unfortunately, the NHL cannot allow this to happen or they are opening up an extremely huge can of worms. Teams like Detroit will start signing guys for $4 million per with a $5 million per contract from Little Caesars, etc, etc, etc.

Hoping he signs with the Leafs but this will NOT be good for the NHL if they let this happen. There's a reason "Personal Services" contracts that were made famous by the USFL are NOT allowed in sports anymore. I believe it was only a couple of years ago Donald Trump stopped paying Herschel Walker from the 80s.

Corporations should NOT be deciding where our sports go from here on either.

Teams in Florida and other States have the advantage of low tax rates for players. Canadian teams and teams in highly taxed states (like the Rangers) need to be able to do something to offset that advantage.
 
You know its cap circumvention when the mayor of the city and a CEO of another company is present at a contract meating :help: I have no problem with it but either you follow the rules or you get rid of them. NHL is a joke, says enough when Arizona has a guy working for the league on their roster counting against the cap and beeing paid by them.
 
Which would be extremely hard to prove. The Leafs would most likely have to be caught putting money into Canadian Tire somehow. Until that happens the Leafs can't make financial decisions for the Canadian Tire group.

There is no need to prove anything. The burden of proof isn't anything substantial.

And no, the Leafs wouldn't have to be caught putting money into Canadian Tire. The CBA explicitly prohibits team actors from arranging sponsorships for a player.
 
Teams in Florida and other States have the advantage of low tax rates for players. Canadian teams and teams in highly taxed states (like the Rangers) need to be able to do something to offset that advantage.

That's why the cap should be adjusted to compensate for tax. Like, Montreal should have 20% more cap than Tampa. Or whatever it would work out to be.
 
One party people aren't mentioning is the NHLPA.

They don't want a superstar to get a low NHL salary(by superstar standard). Since a lot of less famous players won't get endorsement deals on the side, but Stamkos AAV will be used as comparison.
 
It's sketchy as hell, and if big market clubs make a habit of coordinating FA signings with outside sponsors (and doing so so publicly), there'll be some pissed off small market owners and some clear language against this in the next CBA. Although the language is already pretty clear:

However, nothing in this Section 26.3(e) is intended to prohibit a Player
from entering into a sponsorship, endorsement or other commercial
arrangement with a local sponsor or entity with which his Club does
business but which is not a Club Affiliated Entity, in which the Player
receives something of value, provided the thing of value received is
commensurate with (i.e., not clearly in excess of) the fair market value of
the services rendered by the Player on behalf of the sponsor or entity.
With respect to any sponsorship or endorsement arrangement between a
Player and a national sponsor, any thing of value provided to a Player
under such arrangement shall be presumptively acceptable (i.e., such thing
of value need not meet the "fair market value" test set forth in the
preceding sentence), provided that such arrangement was not made at the
behest of the Player's Club or any other Club Actor. However, the NHL
shall have the right to challenge before the System Arbitrator, through an
expedited arbitration proceeding pursuant to the third sentence of Section
26.13(a) below, the bona fides of any such national sponsorship or
endorsement arrangement on the grounds that it was actually provided for
the benefit of a particular Club.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad