ABasin
Registered User
- Dec 4, 2002
- 10,574
- 2,273
Why was McLeod playing so half-assed before JSG spoke up in the media about people not playing hard then? Why, as a leader and someone with an "A" on their chest, did he allow the team to just give up and form a "Vegas culture", and then needed JSG to say something? If you can't even take pride in your own game, well, that's not exactly a characteristic of someone who takes pride in their team, especially someone who has more pride than 99% of the players. It's easy to be a leader and show great team pride when things are going well. It's the bad times that real leaders step up, not cave themselves.
Hmm. Not sure if that's valid criticism, a bit harsh. Or perhaps both.
At the end of that disastrous season, I seem to remember McLeod playing the same basic game he's always played - playing all out, physical forecheck, decent speed, hands of stone. I don't remember his game degrading all that much during the latter days of Sacco, unlike a lot of players. That degradation didn't happen until this past season under Roy.
And while JSG's Vegas comments to the press were a nice breath of fresh air for us long-frustrated fans, who really knows what was said behind closed doors amongst the players? I think it's much easier to see on-ice leadership than off-ice. Any conclusions made around the latter are likely top heavy in conjecture.