Nikishin Go Boom
Russian Bulldozer Consultent
- Jul 31, 2017
- 23,708
- 55,334
uhh, what? eye test is that our 3rd pair this year is notably better than last year. I'm not great with advanced stats but a quick look at xG% and actual goal% supports that.
xG%:
Cole-Smith
Regular season: 60.3%
Playoffs: 45.7%
Ghost-Chat
Regular season: 67.5%
Playoffs: 50.5%
actual goal%:
Cole-Smith
Regular season: 55%
Playoffs: 40%
Ghost-Chat
Regular season: 57.1%
Playoffs: 44.4%
And that doesn't even take into account the significant amount of boneheaded penalties Cole and Smith took...
Lets look at. Boston and Ranger were a lot better than Isles and Devils.
C-S had a better goals against / 60 by a .65 goal.
Ghost-Chat- had a better xGA by .37 / 60
C-S had a better HDCF / 60 by 4.4 and a lower HDCA / 60 by 3.91
C-S played harder matchups and had half the O zone starts per 60, and almost twice the D zone starts per 60.
Chat and Ghost have a 73.8 % o zone start percentage in 5v5 play.
C-S was 48%.
The difference in the 2 pairs in xG%/60 is only 2.55 percentage points. in Ghost/Chat's favor. Not as big of a number as the count data suggests.
Despite Chat and Ghost being heavily protected against weaker competition, Cole and Smith still allowed less HD chances per 60 and allowed less goals per 60. Probably add in Raanta had a lower save percentage last playoffs than Andersen does now which would help boost Ghost's and Chat's on ice numbers too.
Chat and Ghost have been Hankappa/Bean or Gardiner/Fluery levels of meh looking at the rates, starting positions, and level of competition.
Last edited: