- Sep 27, 2017
- 5,721
- 3,017
You legitimately think replacing Johnny with another "Gaudreau" is a good idea?Freddy Gaudreau for future considerations.
Gaudreau gets a restart under a coach that has favored him. Columbus gets a semi cheap bottom 6 forward that can act as a Swiss army knife that plays wing and center
I imagine that it's already known. Yes, Gaudreau's death is a tragedy and I can see maybe not conducting any business that's going to attract too much public attention. But I would be surprised if less than a day went by after Gaudreau's death before Don Waddell was in touch with the NHL offices about the effects of Gaudreau's death on the cap. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if the Blue Jackets already have moves lined to get to the cap floor but just won't announce them until later this week after the funeral.I'm sure the NHL's ruling on a cap exception will be known shortly, maybe a a day or two after the service on Monday
AgreedPeople die all the time. When it happens to those closest to us, we might get 3, maybe 5 or 10 days off if we're lucky. Meanwhile we send the kids to school, pay our bills, organize funerals and take care of business while we grive the ones we loved most.
Only someone who has lived an extremely sheltered life would think that somehow, it's inconceivable to ask Don Waddell, not even Gaudreau's relative, to do his job and get to the cap floor with more than a month's notice.
This. I don't see why people want to see the CBJ's to get to get an exemption.It's a CBA issue, which requires PA to signoff if an exception is granted. PA job is to do what is best for their players. With current members without contracts, they'd more likely do not agree to an exception. Because a team that doesn't have the cap room if given the space, may actually use it if they free up cap space and sign other players.
As a whole, players have had to return money to the league, so even if an exception was granted, the players would more than likely owe escrow back to the NHL vs the NHL owing the players money.
I imagine Bettman would've already told Waddell not to worry about the cap floor.
This is the weirdest straw man ever. People aren't pro giving the cap exemption in the name of mourning here. The season starts in a month. Draft happened, free agency happened. We're starting training camp. Teams are largely set in stone here. It's the worst time of year to attempt to make moves like this.People die all the time. When it happens to those closest to us, we might get 3, maybe 5 or 10 days off if we're lucky. Meanwhile we send the kids to school, pay our bills, organize funerals and take care of business while we grive the ones we loved most.
Only someone who has lived an extremely sheltered life would think that somehow, it's inconceivable to ask Don Waddell, not even Gaudreau's relative, to do his job and get to the cap floor with more than a month's notice.
JG's contract is going to be paid out. The actual compensation hasn't changed. No player has been denied their entitled to compensation.This. I don't see why people want to see the CBJ's to get to get an exemption.
JG contract was already looking like one of the worst in the league. This is not a reflection on him as a human or this tragedy but it is true.
The Jackets do not need any further compensation other than the CAP relief from the contract.
There is no reason for a player to not get a contract this season that is deserved based on the terms of the CBE.
Columbus historically have had a hard time attracting free agents.Marner is a UFA, so they can sign him without giving up any assets on July 1st. Unless you talking about a sign and trade with Toronto.
It's a small amount in around $3 mill to hit the cap floor. That's like the average value of an NHL contract these days. And it doesn't have to be a warm body. Could be an LTIR player which would cost CBJ nothing to acquire and more than likely a draft pick to take on and pay out the small % that is not covered by insurance. (from what I read on Hossa/Bolland, it's about 20% that the team needs to cover).JG's contract is going to be paid out. The actual compensation hasn't changed. No player has been denied their entitled to compensation.
Again, I don't think that would happen and I suspect this will get resolved without much drama but I absolutely believe Columbus should get a little leeway here to make a fair decision for their organization if they need it.
I agree there are several possible solutions and, again, I think something will get worked out.It's a small amount in around $3 mill to hit the cap floor. That's like the average value of an NHL contract these days. And it doesn't have to be a warm body. Could be an LTIR player which would cost CBJ nothing to acquire and more than likely a draft pick to take on and pay out the small % that is not covered by insurance. (from what I read on Hossa/Bolland, it's about 20% that the team needs to cover).
As for the remainder of the JG contract, that's going to take time for the family to get a payout (full value). I don't think it falls on the CBJ to pay it out, would be from insurance. May end up having to go to court to get it paid out.
Unless CBJ has said otherwise I don't think his contract will be paid out. There will be a 1 year payout, which will be covered by insurance and that's that.JG's contract is going to be paid out. The actual compensation hasn't changed. No player has been denied their entitled to compensation.
And the Jackets can just as easily trade for an existing contract rather than sign someone who is currently unsigned. So there is no guarantee an unsigned player now gets a job.
The issue here isn't actually the tragic death, it's the TIMING of it coming fairly close to the deadline and at a point when rosters are largely set.
Again, as several folks have said, this all may be moot since Waddell was already talking about adding a contract prior to this.
The floor exists to prevent teams from cheaping out and icing non competitive teams. That is clearly not the situation here. The team's BEST, not to mention highest paid, player suddenly died. Columbus wasn't trying to game shit and I feel fairly certain that if they were granted God like powers they would take the player over the savings.
If we want to go to an extreme example to make a point what I think would be unfair is a scenario where it's down to the deadline and a team says "take this contract and since you're over a barrell you also have to give us a 1st round pick too" or something ridiculous like that.
Again, I don't think that would happen and I suspect this will get resolved without much drama but I absolutely believe Columbus should get a little leeway here to make a fair decision for their organization if they need it.
There won't be any "special consideration." Neither the union nor the league has any interest in anything but business, and there's no threat of bad PR in this case because it's Columbus. A week earlier everyone was in full agreement with Craig Button and full-steam ahead with the usual "lol Blue Jackets" and "Johnny retired in summer 2022 lmao" jokes. Search "Columbus" on this very website with the date limited to before August 29th. The Blue Jackets don't get to have nice things.I agree there are several possible solutions and, again, I think something will get worked out.
What I disagree with is the stance that no special consideration -- if needed -- from the league (and union, obviously) is warranted. This is very clearly a unique situation. Columbus should have to hit the floor like everyone else but, given the timing here, I don't think they should have to fix that in the next month if they don't see a reasonable way to do so. Management should have some freedom to fix this in a fair and reasonable way.
Yeah well, those are even weirder objections.This is the weirdest straw man ever. People aren't pro giving the cap exemption in the name of mourning here. The season starts in a month. Draft happened, free agency happened. We're starting training camp. Teams are largely set in stone here. It's the worst time of year to attempt to make moves like this.
Also, everyone says oh just sign a guy. You can't force a guy to sign with you. They have to want to. Im a CBJ fan, but unfortunately I see a world where a guy would rather not sign here. Just roll the dice and hope for another opening as the season progresses.
This is a lousy argument. The amount of time off someone gets from their employer has nothing to do with salary cap rules. No one is claiming Don W. is unwilling or unable to do his job.People die all the time. When it happens to those closest to us, we might get 3, maybe 5 or 10 days off if we're lucky. Meanwhile we send the kids to school, pay our bills, organize funerals and take care of business while we grive the ones we loved most.
Only someone who has lived an extremely sheltered life would think that somehow, it's inconceivable to ask Don Waddell, not even Gaudreau's relative, to do his job and get to the cap floor with more than a month's notice.
Any and everything would require PA and nhl approval. IMO at most the cba may provide a time line or process that is required as each situation would be unique.This is a lousy argument. The amount of time off someone gets from their employer has nothing to do with salary cap rules. No one is claiming Don W. is unwilling or unable to do his job.
The amount in this scenario can be managed in a variety of ways, and I'm sure it will resolved soon enough. But I also think it raises significant questions that the league is likely to address in the next CBA. For example, what if this happened to Conner McDavid and Leon Draisaitl? Or if a team lost 5+ players in a common accident? Would that team then be expected to sign replacement level players to contract amounts they would never receive on the open market just to hit the cap floor?
Kotekneimi or Norris maybe?
But this coming from people who, if their own team had lost players, and no one that will top 60pts this year, we know what they would want their team to do? trade for cap dumps and bottom 6 plplayers.
This is a lousy argument. The amount of time off someone gets from their employer has nothing to do with salary cap rules. No one is claiming Don W. is unwilling or unable to do his job.
The amount in this scenario can be managed in a variety of ways, and I'm sure it will resolved soon enough. But I also think it raises significant questions that the league is likely to address in the next CBA. For example, what if this happened to Conner McDavid and Leon Draisaitl? Or if a team lost 5+ players in a common accident? Would that team then be expected to sign replacement level players to contract amounts they would never receive on the open market just to hit the cap floor?