Sooooo how about Evan Bouchard's defense last night

Fourier

Registered User
Dec 29, 2006
26,720
22,309
Waterloo Ontario
Context matters.

Bouchard gets the most offensive zone starts among defensemen on the team, and plays almost exclusively with McDavid when he's in the lineup (65% of Bouchards five on five icetime is with McDavid and that's with #97 missing 3 full games).
Then lets look at last year and this away from McDavid 5 vs 5.

Toi 801:27 CF% 59.32 GF% 56.92 xGF% 58.79 SCF% 58.06 HDCF% 60.63 OZF% 52.72

Then we get: But what about Ekholm????? Here are his numbers away from Ekholm since last year.

TOI 315:43 CF% 61.00 GF% 56.25 xGF% 63.69 SCF% 61.49 HDCF% 65.10 OZF% 57.45

One also has to be careful about concluding too much from zone start stats.

Lets also look at Cale Makar over the same period away from MacKinnon.

TOI 515:02 CF% 45.19 GF% 41.86 xGF% 46.21 SCF% 49.15 HDCF% 46.39 OZF% 43.05
 
Last edited:

ponder

Registered User
Jul 11, 2007
17,044
6,554
Vancouver
That 2nd goal against is legitimately hilarious, just awful defense from Bouchard.

Doesn't help the narrative that he's just a PP specialist feeding off of McDavid.
I do think this is an exaggeration, I'd describe him more as:
  • He's great offensively, on the PP and at ES. Great shot, great vision/offensive instincts, very good puck mover. Obviously McDavid helps his numbers, but he'd score well on any team IMO (fewer points but still strong)
  • He's a good possession driver in general, due largely to strong zone exits/transition play - few things drive possession like being able to cleanly exit the defensive zone, and cleanly enter the offensive zone
  • He's bad defensively, poor effort far too often, and is frequently out of position. That doesn't mean he's bad overall at ES, he's not, his possession driving and offence more than make up for his defence, but he's bad defensively. Like if the other team has the puck and is pressuring, Bouchard is not who I want on the ice to prevent them from scoring, at all
  • He's going to make around 1-2 legitimately terrible mistakes most nights
He's definitely a net positive player, at even strength and especially on the PP. He's a great guy to throw over the boards with possession dominating teammates like McDavid, as he'll help you make the most of that possession, and his defensive weaknesses/mistakes will be exposed less often.

But ... he also definitely should not be a Norris contender, as some want to make him out to be. IMO a Norris contender should be a guy you're happy to deploy in almost any situation, a guy the coach can really depend on for basically whatever needs to be done, definitely not a guy you need to shelter. There are rare exceptions if the offence is just SO amazing, like prime Karlsson, but these exceptions are really rare. Obviously Makar and Quinn are the clear top 2 Norris candidates (amazing offence and strong "all situations" guys), but there's also no way I'm putting Bouchard above guys like Hedman, Fox, Josi, Morrissey, Dahlin, Andersson or Carlson. And I'd personally have him a touch below guys like Faber, Dougie, Rielly and Seider too, although that's certainly far more arguable.

If he improves defensively, gets more consistent with his effort/motor, and cuts way down on the bad mistakes, I think he's got John Carlson upside, but IMO he's not there today. His offence and puck moving is on par with Carlson, maybe even a touch ahead, but he's well below Carlson in terms of defence and motor, and makes more bad mistakes.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: WetcoastOrca

Dion TheFluff

Registered User
Jun 22, 2015
4,139
3,647
Anybody that didn't think he was a top D in the league last year didn't watch the playoffs. He started slow last year but the second half of the season was good and in the playoffs was great. Typical Fluff
mooching off McDavid just like the rest of that team.
 

Soundwave

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
74,328
30,536
Sure. But you could come up with better examples for Bouchard. Tyson Barrie maybe? Not Orr, Gretzky, Lemieux, Crosby etc
Those players were certainly highly appreciated by all reasonable people.

Tyson Barrie in his wildest dreams would never have the playoffs that Bouchard just did.

Bouchard was the best player on either team in the Edmonton-Vancouver series, if not tell me who was better.

The comparable that I think of and maybe it's because he's Bouchard's coach is Paul Coffey. It's like Coffey is getting his comeuppance now for all the years he could sometimes drive Glen Sather crazy on the bench once in a while with wishy washy play but then come back and score a ton of points.

The more modern comparable may be John Carlson with the Caps but with more offensive ability.
 

WetcoastOrca

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 3, 2011
40,014
25,741
Vancouver, BC
Tyson Barrie in his wildest dreams would never have the playoffs that Bouchard just did.

Bouchard was the best player on either team in the Edmonton-Vancouver series, if not tell me who was better.

The comparable that I think of and maybe it's because he's Bouchard's coach is Paul Coffey. It's like Coffey is getting his comeuppance now for all the years he could sometimes drive Glen Sather crazy on the bench once in a while with wishy washy play but then come back and score a ton of points.
I watched Coffey. He’s nowhere close to Mr. Coffey.
And sure he was one of the better players in the Van series. What does that prove exactly?
Skinner looked good in the SCF. Is he a great goalie?
 

Soundwave

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
74,328
30,536
I watched Coffey. He’s nowhere close to Mr. Coffey.
And sure he was one of the better players in the Van series. What does that prove exactly?
Skinner looked good in the SCF. Is he a great goalie?

I didn't say he was one of the better players, he was the best player in that series full stop.

When Stuart Skinner can ever say that maybe he'll have a case to be held in better esteem.

Bouchard's numbers in the playoffs last year were some of the highest since (well) Paul Coffey.

448640296_852275053587846_6862209709218817308_n.jpg
 

HighLifeManIsHigh

McDave is a loser lol
Feb 27, 2006
1,214
641
I didn't say he was one of the better players, he was the best player in that series full stop.

When Stuart Skinner can ever say that maybe he'll have a case to be held in better esteem.

Bouchard's numbers in the playoffs last year were some of the highest since (well) Paul Coffey.

448640296_852275053587846_6862209709218817308_n.jpg
There’s more to hockey than just points dude. That’s what you guys don’t understand. JT Miller was better in that series. I’m sure Bouchard had more points, but Miller was an absolute animal.

But his corsi and shit probably wasn’t as good, therefore, the stats obsessed fanbase thinks otherwise
 

TIGERCOOL

Registered User
Sep 29, 2014
2,263
1,257
The advanced stats community gaslighting about Bouchard's defence is very remeniscent of Jake Gardiner. With some guys you really should trust the eye test
 
  • Like
Reactions: HighLifeManIsHigh

Frank Drebin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,613
23,349
Edmonton
The advanced stats community gaslighting about Bouchard's defence is very remeniscent of Jake Gardiner. With some guys you really should trust the eye test
Did you watch the nhl playoffs last spring

I watched Coffey. He’s nowhere close to Mr. Coffey.
And sure he was one of the better players in the Van series. What does that prove exactly?
Skinner looked good in the SCF. Is he a great goalie?
Skinner didn’t look good in any series, what are you talking about? He had a solid 2-3 games vs dallas otherwise he was complete ass
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad