dem said:I'd really love to know what game Siberian was watching.
Through his TSN is the devil, Russia is god goggles.
dem said:I'd really love to know what game Siberian was watching.
RUSqueelin said:First - it was a Russian reporter making the comment.
Second - I hope Ovechkin would be ripping up the tourney this year. He's overage.
Ovechkin, Malkin, and Crosby and the best three young players on the planet and would be neck and neck and neck for the calder had Malkin joined the NHL.
The only difference is Crosby is 18, Malkin is 19, and Ovechkin is 21.
dem said:I'd really love to know what game Siberian was watching.
RUSqueelin said:First - it was a Russian reporter making the comment.
Second - I hope Ovechkin would be ripping up the tourney this year. He's overage.
Ovechkin, Malkin, and Crosby and the best three young players on the planet and would be neck and neck and neck for the calder had Malkin joined the NHL.
The only difference is Crosby is 18, Malkin is 19, and Ovechkin is 21.
ferns8916 said:And isn't that a little bit too much as well?
I mean, Malkin is good, but he isn't as good as Ovechkin. I think Ovechkin would be tearing this tournament apart much more than Malkin is, considering Ovechkin in 2005 played better than Malkin is in 2006 (at least in my opinion).
Kinbote said:That guy was right.
Malkin > Crosby
phaneuf_fan_3 said:LOL @ NO
That is funny, you bet your butt that is overrating him, Crosby is putting up just as high of a points per game in the NHL as Malkin is iin Russia, not to mention that Malkin is ayear older
ferns8916 said:Some guy just said on TSN that if Malkin was Canadian, then you could forget about Crosby, because Crosby wouldn't be close in terms of ability and hype.
Isn't this over-rating Malkin a little bit? Just a little?
Siberian said:Malkin was wrestled down, clutched and grabbed every time. That is why they put pressure on IIHF in terms of officiating, they wanted this grabbing game, there is no other way for them to win the game.
Jaded-Fan said:I am a Pens' fan for Christ's sake. When I go to games I happen to wear a Malkin Jersey, not a Crosby one. I am hardly biased against him. But you have to be rational and reasonable, something that I seldom find on this board where people either diefy a prospect or tear him down for the silliest things - often times both, within a week of one another as the flavor of the week changes. By far my largest criticism of HF.
Malkin is an enormous talent, I doubt that anyone is saying otherwise. But he is where Crosby and Ovechkin were last year - a prospect, a projection. Why is it a surprise that Malkin will have to prove that he is in the same class once he reaches the NHL level just like they did? Or that their accomplishments this year in the NHL, where they have progressed further than anyone really imagined, would not vault them to a level Malkin will have to prove he belongs at? My God, each are as likely as not going to be close to if not over 50 goal scorers and 100 point men at the NHL level. One at 18, one at 20. Let that sink in a minute. It is no slight on him at all, merely being reasonable about a talent people are rightly excited about.
HabLover said:Will Malkin even get any ice-time at the Olympics?
Yet by your logic Firsov, Mikhailov, Kharlamov, Bobrov, Tretiak, ect where mere prospects and busts at that because they never proved themseleves in the NHL.
revolverjgw said:He may or may not have performed better than Ovechkin in the RSL, but let's face it, the true test will be the NHL, and Ovechkin's passed it with flying colors.
revolverjgw said:Malkin is going to be awesome, maybe on Sid and AO's level, but ''clearly above it''? He'd better be Mario Lemieux v2 to live up to that. Tonight's game didn't exactly help to clarify his superiority, either.
Metallian said:EXACTLY
Ovechkin, Crosby, and Malkin are all on that top level. that 100+ points a season level. the best available.
anything clearly above that is ungodly numbers like lemieux/gretzky. 150+pts a season. 200pts a season, etc.
right now they are all at the top, at the kovalchuk/jagr/forsberg/thornton level, but any of "the big 3" have yet to show they can top that and take it to another level
I'm absolutely convinced that the ones that come out with trash don't watch or they watch with filters on and can't watch a game objectively.dem said:Thats just trash.. do people even watch Crosby anymore.. or do they just *****? The kid is ridiculous.
Twi2teD said:Ill just say that if crosby was in the world juniors this year he wouldve completely dominated the tournament and even moreso next year. And after a few years of pro experience like makin and ovy have IMO he will be a step ahead of them... MAlkin is one of my fav players and Ovechkin has grown on me and they will both be gamebreaking superior talents but i think Crosby will enter that realm of G.O.A.T.
...imo
oil slick said:I agree with that too. IMO if Crosby were to be there next year (as a 19 year old), there is absolutely no way he would have been shut out in the gold medal game.
Siberian said:Malkin was wrestled down, clutched and grabbed every time. That is why they put pressure on IIHF in terms of officiating, they wanted this grabbing game, there is no other way for them to win the game.