This is an admission that someone else had it, and not him, which I did not see acknowledged in the piece.
Wish I said that before I told him to ignore meIf he just reported on things it wouldn't be as bad. It's the fake insider shit that makes him a clout chasing weasel.
If he just reported on things it wouldn't be as bad. It's the fake insider shit that makes him a clout chasing weasel.
Yeah but come one. Farabee was a Propaganda Minister himself. That is not needed. He believes everything he said. It wasnt i need to be a good teammate. It was i say what i think!No current hockey player is gonna go on a podcast and talk about how awful and hopeless his team is and how his teammates are worthless bums, lol. Especially not a podcast that focuses on the team he plays for.
That's why I usually listen to podcast interviews with retired players but skip the ones with current players.
The retconning of “Well actually, Hakstol was a good coach for the Flyers and it was all the players and Hextall’s fault” is the weirdest thing on Flyers social media these days:
View attachment 692664
The retconning of “Well actually, Hakstol was a good coach for the Flyers and it was all the players and Hextall’s fault” is the weirdest thing on Flyers social media these days:
View attachment 692664
As a fan slowly transitioning from a Flyers fan to the PNW heartthrob Kraken, I slightly resent/resemble those remarks. In Hak we trust!He hasn’t been the Flyers coach in 4 years. He went to Toronto to be their PK coach — where they specifically sucked on the PK, which gets glossed over like Vancouver Tortorella. Now, the Kraken are undoubtedly having a good year. Coaches do learn, coaches do improve. That doesn’t retroactively mean they could’ve done a good job prior. It’s almost like failure is the major component of learning.
Now, what specifically did Hakstol improve at THIS year? His cheerleaders don’t provide an answer. Well, they’re 13th in adj xGF% at 5v5 and 7th in CF%. Hakstol’s teams always outshot their chance metrics, so that checks out, even if the Flyers were more below average and average in each respectively. The real secret is leading the league in 5v5 shooting % and being 2nd all situations behind Edmonton’s monster offense. That doesn’t mean they’re not a respectable squad, but it’s a bit smoke and mirrors.
In a lot of ways, Seattle curbs his worst tendencies. They have a super deep scoring bottom 6 — and a way better analytics department — that he never had here, through his shared design, as he fancied sub-NHL feckless dumpers like VDV. Besides Beniers, who hit the ground running, he hasn’t had to integrate much youth, which he sucked all the ass at doing. And the archetypes he traditionally overuses (grit, defense), Seattle has good versions. The idea he came to Jesus is a bit much. I doubt it bears out in the long run.
I said it to six sigma, now I must say it to you…As a fan slowly transitioning from a Flyers fan to the PNW heartthrob Kraken, I slightly resent/resemble those remarks. In Hak we trust!
As a fan slowly transitioning from a Flyers fan to the PNW heartthrob Kraken, I slightly resent/resemble those remarks. In Hak we trust!
He hasn’t been the Flyers coach in 4 years. He went to Toronto to be their PK coach — where they specifically sucked on the PK, which gets glossed over like Vancouver Tortorella. Now, the Kraken are undoubtedly having a good year. Coaches do learn, coaches do improve. That doesn’t retroactively mean they could’ve done a good job prior. It’s almost like failure is the major component of learning.
Now, what specifically did Hakstol improve at THIS year? His cheerleaders don’t provide an answer. Well, they’re 13th in adj xGF% at 5v5 and 7th in CF%. Hakstol’s teams always outshot their chance metrics, so that checks out, even if the Flyers were more below average and average in each respectively. The real secret is leading the league in 5v5 shooting % and being 2nd all situations behind Edmonton’s monster offense. That doesn’t mean they’re not a respectable squad, but it’s a bit smoke and mirrors.
In a lot of ways, Seattle curbs his worst tendencies. They have a super deep scoring bottom 6 — and a way better analytics department — that he never had here, through his shared design, as he fancied sub-NHL feckless dumpers like VDV. Besides Beniers, who hit the ground running, he hasn’t had to integrate much youth, which he sucked all the ass at doing. And the archetypes he traditionally overuses (grit, defense), Seattle has good versions. The idea he came to Jesus is a bit much. I doubt it bears out in the long run.
I was definitely being sarcastic to get a PNW reference in for Celsius time because you guys have been picking on C88.First off: gross. But if he came in one summer with a goatee here, I’d probably have been more optimistic.
The Flyers had a bunch of teens and early 20-somethings he couldn’t integrate. Seattle’s entire team almost is in the midst of their primes or just past them. It’s hard to overplay plugs with that roster because there really are none. Hakstol was never an unmitigated disaster with systems — besides o-zone chances. It’s horrifying to think about it, but he’s probably better as an X’s and O’s coach than anyone since. He also was a total asshole, which is why people disliked him so. It’s horrifying to think about it, but he’s probably less of an asshole than anyone since. Go Flyers!
View attachment 692685
You can see the precise moment the Hakshell began a little over halfway through after a break.
it's simple. this quote is so stupid. he has no self-awareness, apparently. dude had a thought, added the scout told me thing to seem relevant and in the loop, and just ended up sounding even more stupider than if he just said, i think it might be too early to get bedard.That is exactly my biggest "issue" there - I am used to Sommermannnnnnn saying stupid things. But the idea that somehow a hockey scout came to him (not the other way around) and asked about his opinion about whether there are timing caveats on getting a Bedard ...
Just no. Did. Not. Happen.
it's simple. this quote is so stupid. he has no self-awareness, apparently. dude had a thought, added the scout told me thing to seem relevant and in the loop, and just ended up sounding even more stupider than if he just said, i think it might be too early to get bedard.
this is the second most stupid thing ive ever heard in the last decade the flyers have been shitty. its like saying bill dineen was a great coach and it was upper managements fault.The retconning of “Well actually, Hakstol was a good coach for the Flyers and it was all the players and Hextall’s fault” is the weirdest thing on Flyers social media these days:
View attachment 692664
I don't know what I'm more surprised by, the fans actually disagreeing with him or him being dumb enough to double down on it
That is exactly my biggest "issue" there - I am used to Sommermannnnnnn saying stupid things. But the idea that somehow a hockey scout came to him (not the other way around) and asked about his opinion about whether there are timing caveats on getting a Bedard ...
Just no. Did. Not. Happen.
Atkinson said they were closer than people think. I agree no player is going to publicly admit things are bad. It’s nothing to get upset over.No current hockey player is gonna go on a podcast and talk about how awful and hopeless his team is and how his teammates are worthless bums, lol. Especially not a podcast that focuses on the team he plays for.
That's why I usually listen to podcast interviews with retired players but skip the ones with current players.
Yeah, crappy work environments/bosses and tight knit coworkers aren't mutually exclusive things. Obviously the lines about how the team is gonna be good next year/things are looking up are corporate line toeing, but I don't doubt they're largely friendly with each other or have close friends on the teamAtkinson said they were closer than people think. I agree no player is going to publicly admit things are bad. It’s nothing to get upset over.