Soccer beats Hockey in the US

Rocket

Registered User
Feb 3, 2007
297
0
New York, USA
Are you sure? 40 million seems kind of high. Have you got a source for that? As I understand it, the number was 40 million worldwide.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/soccer/20060722-9999-1s22soccer.html


These people that watched this game aren't soccer fans, they're Mexico fans, big difference.

You obviously don't have a clue on the soccer scene in this country. Those are some of the biggest soccer fans you'll ever see. They follow the Mexican league on Spanish lang. channels all year long. TV ratings for those games are pretty decent too. I remember one of the games (Chivas vs. Club America) this year even outdrawing the Stanley Cup final ratings. They also come out in droves whenever some of the MFL clubs come here for exhibition and other tournament games, ignoring the high ticket price.


And, the two sports!

I don't have the time to go through this again. Read my posts in these threads.

http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?p=8026360#post8026360

http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?p=7994569#post7994569
 

Rocket

Registered User
Feb 3, 2007
297
0
New York, USA
There are also fans spending money on AHL, CHL, College and other games from other leagues.

Does soccer have these layers of support in the U.S?

The USL-1 drew 4,667 per game last year. Not sure about the USL-2 and PDL, but I'm sure you only make your points weaker when you compare the minor leagues for both sports as they have even smaller gap.

In case you didn't click on those two links to my earlier posts let me summarize them in one sentence. NHL is followed by majority of the hockey fans in this country while soccer ratings and attendances are split in many ways, with all the international leagues and different national team games on TV and in the stadiums around the country when we host them many times a year.
 
Last edited:

LGP8771

Registered User
Apr 2, 2007
229
7
This is ridiculous.


American sports fans prefer hockey over soccer. Most of them may not care about either sport, but hockey has a stronger following among Americans.

Think about it. MLS is so new! The NHL has at the very least survived in the USA, it's a successful league with 24 pro teams that sell out to 90%+ capacity.

Granted, soccer has also had leagues and experienced success (70's with Pele, for instance), but hockey had a bigger presence than soccer on ESPN in the 90's and up to 2003.

The fact that we're even discussing this, in my opinion, is ridiculous.

Remember what you heard about soccer growing up in high school... "Soccer is for f@gs." At least the haters don't say that about hockey. Soccer is pathetic in the USA. TV ratings don't reflect American sports fans. They reflect Mexican and South American sports fans.

You obviously don't have a clue on the soccer scene in this country. Those are some of the biggest soccer fans you'll ever see. They follow the Mexican league on Spanish lang. channels all year long. TV ratings for those games are pretty decent too. I remember one of the games (Chivas vs. Club America) this year even outdrawing the Stanley Cup final ratings. They also come out in droves whenever some of the MFL clubs come here for exhibition and other tournament games, ignoring the high ticket price.

LMAO. Even the teams' names are in Spanish. You think MLS doesn't know who their fans are? Look at this whole Beckham thing. The first game, the one they're marketing everywhere as if this guy is the next Pele or Ronaldo or Romario, is going to draw a record amount of viewers.

Let's see how they do a year from now when Beckham is still playing for the "Galaxy" (what fruity team names they pick too!).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Bear of Bad News

"The Worst Guy on the Site" - user feedback
Sep 27, 2005
14,267
29,456
So your plan is to poll only Native Americans? :shakehead
 
Last edited by a moderator:

krudmonk

Registered User
Jan 12, 2006
5,509
0
Sannozay
The USL-1 drew 4,667 per game last year. Not sure about the USL-2 and PDL, but I'm sure you only make your points weaker when you compare the minor leagues for both sports as they have even smaller gap.
Excellent point. Support of soccer is hardly limited to the 13 current clubs. There are many markets begging for an MLS franchise but the league is smart to pace itself and not go the way of the NASL (or even the NHL). I think some hockey fans are confused by smart planning, mistaking it for weak showing. Thanks, Bettman.
 

Refuse

Sin City Soldiers
Aug 23, 2005
2,421
1,070
You really need to read what he wrote again.
And still, none of these sports are more popular worldwide. Those are some extremely dodgy mathematics. Those countries populations do not equal 96% of the worlds population.
Latin America = poulation: 561 Million.
Europe = population: 709 Million.
Africa = population: 843 Million.

These continents make up 31% of earths population and could be considered Soccer continents.

Soccer is if not the biggest sport in most countries, it is still a major sport, if not #2. It is growing rapidly in Japan, for example
 

frivolousz21

2019 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS ST LOUIS BLUES
May 17, 2007
3,273
84
St. Louis, Mo
And still, none of these sports are more popular worldwide. Those are some extremely dodgy mathematics. Those countries populations do not equal 96% of the worlds population.
Latin America = poulation: 561 Million.
Europe = population: 709 Million.
Africa = population: 843 Million.

These continents make up 31% of earths population and could be considered Soccer continents.

Soccer is if not the biggest sport in most countries, it is still a major sport, if not #2. It is growing rapidly in Japan, for example

why is the attendance in most leagues plummeting.

I read in Italy is down 10K per match over the last 10 years.

they also dont have high end hockey, baseball, basketball, or football.

there is no comptetion.


someone posted this in a diff thread:

http://www.theoffside.com/world-foot...rspective.html
 
Last edited:

Crazy_Ike

Cookin' with fire.
Mar 29, 2005
9,081
0
why is the attendance in most leagues plummeting.

I read in Italy is down 10K per match over the last 10 years.

they also dont have high end hockey, baseball, basketball, or football.

there is no comptetion.

Clearly that is also Bettman's fault.

:teach:
 

Fugu

Guest
:madfire:

Knock off the comments about ethnic groups and their alleged preferences.
 

bleed_oil

Registered User
Aug 16, 2005
3,898
40
#1 - demographics in the US are changing, people who look like "foreigners" right now won't be in 10 years
#2 - if a sport is poopular, its popular. In Canada, hockey is widely followed by all ethnic groups regardless of origin. If you were at Edmotons Whyte ave in the '06 cup run or Calgarys 17th street in '04 you'd know as much.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Wooty

Registered User
Dec 31, 2006
4,029
3
Harbor City, CA
The false assumption is that Hockey is competing with soccer or visa versa.

Hockey is competing with all the sports, TV, DVD's, Movies, picnics video games etc.
 

nyrmetros

Registered User
May 3, 2007
6,017
195
Are you sure? 40 million seems kind of high. Have you got a source for that? As I understand it, the number was 40 million worldwide.

No. He's right. It was 40 mil in this country alone. SI had the figures in their mag the week following the game.
 

Rob

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
9,194
1,590
New Brunswick
Visit site
This is ridiculous.

Remember what you heard about soccer growing up in high school... "Soccer is for f@gs." At least the haters don't say that about hockey.


I've heard Americans compare hockey to soccer.

Soccer is pathetic in the USA. TV ratings don't reflect American sports fans. They reflect Mexican and South American sports fans.

So Hispanic Americans don't count?

Fact is Soccer is more popular than Hockey in the US.
 

krudmonk

Registered User
Jan 12, 2006
5,509
0
Sannozay
It is growing rapidly in Japan, for example
Asutralia, too. Their league is just a couple years old and it's drawing great numbers because there's little of this arrogant, ************ backlash.
News to me. Say the word soccer in Pennsylvania and you'll most likely just get a blank look followed by "what?"
If you're going to use one of the fifty states as an example, at least pick the most populous one.
 

Stevedude530

Registered User
Dec 21, 2005
1,941
1
On the media front, Univision, which is televising the league for the first time since 1999, earned a 0.1 average household rating and 229,000 viewers through 12 broadcasts at 3 p.m. on Sundays.
ESPN, which is in the first year of an eight-year, $64 million commitment to the league, averaged a 0.2 for its “MLS Primetime Thursday” through 12 broadcasts. The total number of households dropped 2 percent from 2006 to 197,000, but ratings among males 18 to 34 were up 50 percent, according to the network.
Fox Sports en Español, the only other broadcast partner for which ratings figures are available, also averaged a 0.2 through nine weekend broadcasts.
 

Levizk

Registered User
Feb 12, 2007
2,691
0
Monroeville, PA
News to me. Say the word soccer in Pennsylvania and you'll most likely just get a blank look followed by "what?"

Actually back in the 90s there was serious discussion going on about putting a MLS team in Turtle Creek at the Wolvarena as a Pittsburgh franchise. Sure it never became serious enough to actually look at fixing the stadium up and making it a viable candidate for a team, but it's not like soccer is that unheard of in our area. Remember back when we had the Pittsburgh Phantoms roller hockey franchise, we also had the Pittsburgh Stingers indoor soccer franchise. We currently have the Riverhounds now in terms of a pro team even if it's not at the MLS level, so don't make us look that backwards in terms of being tolerant to other sports in our region.
 

Rocket

Registered User
Feb 3, 2007
297
0
New York, USA
On the media front, Univision, which is televising the league for the first time since 1999, earned a 0.1 average household rating and 229,000 viewers through 12 broadcasts at 3 p.m. on Sundays.

Some corrections: Univision is not televising any of the MLS games. The network's 3rd-string channel (after Univision and Galavision) TeleFutura, which is available in many less homes, is. Galavision will show 3 of the games later this year.

ESPN, which is in the first year of an eight-year, $64 million commitment to the league, averaged a 0.2 for its “MLS Primetime Thursday” through 12 broadcasts. The total number of households dropped 2 percent from 2006 to 197,000, but ratings among males 18 to 34 were up 50 percent, according to the network.

To avoid confusion, almost all MLS games are on ESPN2, avilable in less homes than ESPN and usually has lower ratings (for example, NHL games on ESPN2 used to average about half of what they did on ESPN).

Fox Sports en Español, the only other broadcast partner for which ratings figures are available, also averaged a 0.2 through nine weekend broadcasts.

Thanks for the info. I didn't know FSE programs were rated by Nielsen Ratings. Do you have a source?
 

Big McLargehuge

Fragile Traveler
May 9, 2002
72,304
7,979
S. Pasadena, CA
Actually back in the 90s there was serious discussion going on about putting a MLS team in Turtle Creek at the Wolvarena as a Pittsburgh franchise. Sure it never became serious enough to actually look at fixing the stadium up and making it a viable candidate for a team, but it's not like soccer is that unheard of in our area. Remember back when we had the Pittsburgh Phantoms roller hockey franchise, we also had the Pittsburgh Stingers indoor soccer franchise. We currently have the Riverhounds now in terms of a pro team even if it's not at the MLS level, so don't make us look that backwards in terms of being tolerant to other sports in our region.

We have a third tier soccer team that used to play out of a high school football stadium. We're a real soccer hot bed.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad