How do you equate three fundamental Oilers playing through injury versus a fundamental Canuck not playing at all? You can’t - you just feel yours is worse to justify your rhetoric.You're talking about something else. Playing hurt is one thing (which both clubs did), having a star player on the IR at the most important position, and then pretending it wouldn't make any difference (while complaining about the same position having a big influence on their team), is another. Who isn't applying standards here?
I'm not a Canucks fan. That's why I made a discussion thread
Silovs was very average against the Oilers. Oilers fans were trying so hard on here to convince everybody that Silovs wasn’t a third string goalie too. The cope was unreal. They just couldn’t admit the Canucks were playing without a full deck of cards.goaltending is the only reason that series wasnt a sweep. Silov was the canucks best player. skinner was the oilers worst player
I'm not a Canucks fan. That's why I made a discussion thread
Nonsense. You're being purposely obtuse. Nobody has ever claimed the Canucks would have won the cup with Demko, you're angry and making stuff up.How do you equate three fundamental Oilers playing through injury versus a fundamental Canuck not playing at all? You can’t - you just feel yours is worse to justify your rhetoric.
The point is everyone is sick and tired of hearing the injury excuse and “Canucks win the cup with Demko” rhetoric. Both teams were injured and the better team still won.
If you want to go further back, Klefbom has been on the Oilers IR since 2016. Oh ****ing well. Back to reality…
Not being a Canucks fan doesn't mean someone knows nothing about the Canucks lol. Calm down dudeSo you admit to knowing nothing about the Canucks yet you titled the thread "So the Canucks were a product of PDO the whole time?"
You could at least look at the standings before making shit up, they're 2nd in the division in p%.
So you admit to knowing nothing about the Canucks yet you titled the thread "So the Canucks were a product of PDO the whole time?"
That's not the thread title.
It's literally the thread title.
No, it literally is not. The thread title is 'So the Canucks were a product of PDO all this time? Or are they still a legitimate contender?'
It's based on the false premise of the Canucks being a product of PDO. They're playing as good statistically as they were last season, have almost the same amount of points despite a ton of injuries to start the year and the Canucks being PDO merchants was debunked a long time ago.
Asking if they're still a legitimate contender when they're playing better than they did last season despite injuries is just silly when people didn't even think they were a legitimate contender last year.
Silovs played quite well that series. Kept the Canucks in the first few games and now doesn't get the credit he deserves from Canucks fans. A few stinkers in games the Canucks were being outplayed in anyways shouldn't discount that.Nonsense. You're being purposely obtuse. Nobody has ever claimed the Canucks would have won the cup with Demko, you're angry and making stuff up.
Ep, Hughes, and Hronek were all playing through stuff too, but that's not what I was talking about, and you know it.
You want to live with your head buried in the sand, and believe that Demko isn't a major upgrade on Silovs... well that's embarrassing, but don't let me stop you.
They are 4 pts back of Vegas for 1st in the Pacific, with 2 games in hand during an injury riddled start. How is that shitting the bed?It’s the Rick Tocchet effective.
Have one great season, shit the bed the next, get fired the third.
Only an Oilers fan would argue that a goalie that put up an .898 in the playoffs was the reason for a team's success, most other franchises have higher standards than that.Silovs played quite well that series. Kept the Canucks in the first few games and now doesn't get the credit he deserves from Canucks fans. A few stinkers in games the Canucks were being outplayed in anyways shouldn't discount that.
And why not? We're talking about your hypothetical "what if" world. You don't think a healthy McDavid, Draisaitl and Kane aren't a major upgrade over the versions they were in the playoffs with their respective rib injuries, hernias etc?
You want to live with your head buried in the sand and pretend Demko coming off a serious long-term injury is the same goalie he was pre-injury than you're just as obtuse. Especially so if you evidently can't apply your same standard the other way.
Why didn't you warn us about Desharnais!!Con's
Didn't like their offseason, especially on D
Demko out
Hronek out
Pro's
This is a very well built team when healthy
Hughes is unreal
Lots of great players
I think I did.lol I like him.. everyone likes him but he's not it.Why didn't you warn us about Desharnais!!