So the Canucks were a product of PDO all this time? Or are they still a legitimate contender?

PuckG

Registered User
Feb 26, 2015
4,400
6,285
You're talking about something else. Playing hurt is one thing (which both clubs did), having a star player on the IR at the most important position, and then pretending it wouldn't make any difference (while complaining about the same position having a big influence on their team), is another. Who isn't applying standards here?
How do you equate three fundamental Oilers playing through injury versus a fundamental Canuck not playing at all? You can’t - you just feel yours is worse to justify your rhetoric.

The point is everyone is sick and tired of hearing the injury excuse and “Canucks win the cup with Demko” rhetoric. Both teams were injured and the better team still won.

If you want to go further back, Klefbom has been on the Oilers IR since 2016. Oh ****ing well. Back to reality…
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlbOilFAN

Siludin

Registered User
Dec 9, 2010
7,556
5,504
Lankinen has been good but Demko is a legitimate star player, and missing him probably cost them the first round last year, and has cost at least a couple of games this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Szechwan

Zanon

Registered User
Apr 4, 2008
3,941
1,864
Vancouver
goaltending is the only reason that series wasnt a sweep. Silov was the canucks best player. skinner was the oilers worst player
Silovs was very average against the Oilers. Oilers fans were trying so hard on here to convince everybody that Silovs wasn’t a third string goalie too. The cope was unreal. They just couldn’t admit the Canucks were playing without a full deck of cards.

The fact remains, Demko was out and that benefited the Oilers.

This season they’ve been treading water so far with of all the injuries they’ve sustained.
 

Bobby9

Registered User
Feb 10, 2019
2,502
3,399
All the players played to their ceilings for parts of last year. That’s all it was.

They had very good team chemistry and the players were all excelling.

They’re not playing like that this year other than Hughes and maybe Garland
 
  • Like
Reactions: qc14

qc14

Registered User
Jul 1, 2024
380
634
Still think they're certainly a playoff team and probably in the second group of contenders.

That being said, I was surprised going into the year how they seemed to have convinced everyone they should automatically be placed in the "good team" bucket. A whole lot of guys had career years, they were very lucky in many different ways (injuries, getting out to early leads, etc.) and they did absolutely nothing in the summer to shore up what is maybe one of the worst groups of 2-6D in the league.

It just feels like a team that is playing to it's ceiling and yet still has very notable holes.
 

Rowlet

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 13, 2018
4,595
5,469
I'm not a Canucks fan. That's why I made a discussion thread

So you admit to knowing nothing about the Canucks yet you titled the thread "So the Canucks were a product of PDO the whole time?"

You could at least look at the standings before making shit up, they're 2nd in the division in p%.
 

Hoglander

I'm Höglander. I can do whatever I want.
Jan 4, 2019
1,715
2,939
Midtown, New York
How do you equate three fundamental Oilers playing through injury versus a fundamental Canuck not playing at all? You can’t - you just feel yours is worse to justify your rhetoric.

The point is everyone is sick and tired of hearing the injury excuse and “Canucks win the cup with Demko” rhetoric. Both teams were injured and the better team still won.

If you want to go further back, Klefbom has been on the Oilers IR since 2016. Oh ****ing well. Back to reality…
Nonsense. You're being purposely obtuse. Nobody has ever claimed the Canucks would have won the cup with Demko, you're angry and making stuff up.

Ep, Hughes, and Hronek were all playing through stuff too, but that's not what I was talking about, and you know it.

You want to live with your head buried in the sand, and believe that Demko isn't a major upgrade on Silovs... well that's embarrassing, but don't let me stop you.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: kanucks25 and PuckG

TheOrangeDesk

Registered User
May 27, 2015
1,185
1,560
So you admit to knowing nothing about the Canucks yet you titled the thread "So the Canucks were a product of PDO the whole time?"

You could at least look at the standings before making shit up, they're 2nd in the division in p%.
Not being a Canucks fan doesn't mean someone knows nothing about the Canucks lol. Calm down dude
 

thekernel

Registered User
Apr 11, 2011
6,523
4,051
All things equal, I don't see us beating the Jets, Stars, Panthers, or Hurricanes in the playoffs. Any other team in a best of 7 series is winnable. Of course, the key is getting to the playoffs in the first place. We've been doing great weathering the storm of absences (in striking distance of the division lead, basically exact same position at the exact same time as last year) but if Quinn goes down, party's over
 

Rowlet

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 13, 2018
4,595
5,469
No, it literally is not. The thread title is 'So the Canucks were a product of PDO all this time? Or are they still a legitimate contender?'

It's based on the false premise of the Canucks being a product of PDO. They're playing as good statistically as they were last season, have almost the same amount of points despite a ton of injuries to start the year and the Canucks being PDO merchants was debunked a long time ago.

Asking if they're still a legitimate contender when they're playing better than they did last season despite injuries is just silly when people didn't even think they were a legitimate contender last year. Questioning their status as a contender doesn't change that the premise you built the thread on is factually incorrect.
 

Regal

Registered User
Mar 12, 2010
26,735
16,711
Vancouver
It's based on the false premise of the Canucks being a product of PDO. They're playing as good statistically as they were last season, have almost the same amount of points despite a ton of injuries to start the year and the Canucks being PDO merchants was debunked a long time ago.

Asking if they're still a legitimate contender when they're playing better than they did last season despite injuries is just silly when people didn't even think they were a legitimate contender last year.

They clearly played better last year visually imo and their underlying numbers were also better. Both in expected number and of course actual goal differential. They’ve also had an easy schedule so far. The forwards have been decent but the bottom pairings have been a mess.

Asking about PDO isn’t the right question, I agree, as they were legitimately good last year, but I think it is fair to question how good they are this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Else Ermine

PuckG

Registered User
Feb 26, 2015
4,400
6,285
Nonsense. You're being purposely obtuse. Nobody has ever claimed the Canucks would have won the cup with Demko, you're angry and making stuff up.

Ep, Hughes, and Hronek were all playing through stuff too, but that's not what I was talking about, and you know it.

You want to live with your head buried in the sand, and believe that Demko isn't a major upgrade on Silovs... well that's embarrassing, but don't let me stop you.
Silovs played quite well that series. Kept the Canucks in the first few games and now doesn't get the credit he deserves from Canucks fans. A few stinkers in games the Canucks were being outplayed in anyways shouldn't discount that.

And why not? We're talking about your hypothetical "what if" world. You don't think a healthy McDavid, Draisaitl and Kane aren't a major upgrade over the versions they were in the playoffs with their respective rib injuries, hernias etc?

You want to live with your head buried in the sand and pretend Demko coming off a serious long-term injury is the same goalie he was pre-injury than you're just as obtuse. Especially so if you evidently can't apply your same standard the other way.
 

Szechwan

Registered User
Sep 13, 2006
6,191
6,424
Silovs played quite well that series. Kept the Canucks in the first few games and now doesn't get the credit he deserves from Canucks fans. A few stinkers in games the Canucks were being outplayed in anyways shouldn't discount that.

And why not? We're talking about your hypothetical "what if" world. You don't think a healthy McDavid, Draisaitl and Kane aren't a major upgrade over the versions they were in the playoffs with their respective rib injuries, hernias etc?

You want to live with your head buried in the sand and pretend Demko coming off a serious long-term injury is the same goalie he was pre-injury than you're just as obtuse. Especially so if you evidently can't apply your same standard the other way.
Only an Oilers fan would argue that a goalie that put up an .898 in the playoffs was the reason for a team's success, most other franchises have higher standards than that.

He had his soft moments and kept them in it at times, but he doesn't bring anything near what Demko does.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad