None of us are in the room but we can only guess based on external comments made and the team's play. What evidence is there that Larkin is a good leader / a good captain? The team has collapsed in March 3 years straight under two different coaches, does that sound like a guy who has the team dialed in and is leading them well? He has whined and sulked to the media consistently since he entered the league. We also heard reports that the Wings' locker room is 'very quiet' and guys like Perron were the only ones being vocal leaders on the team. So again, what evidence is there that Larkin is actually acting like a captain on this team, other than being given the role because he was the only non-trash player on the team and a hometown kid when Zetterberg retired?
The 15-16 wings that made the playoffs with career-end Zetterberg scoring 50 pts in 82 games and Datsyuk with 49 pts in 66 games weren't a significantly more skilled team than what we had this season. 24-25 Larkin is a better player than Z was that year, and Raymond is far better than Datsyuk was that year. DBC is better than rookie Larkin. Kane is better than the depth pieces we had that year (the corpse of Mike Richards). On D, Seider is better than end of career Kronwall, and we had just as much trash on D (Quincey, Ericsson, Smith, etc). Difference is they didn't collapse because Zetterberg is 10x the captain and leader Dylan is or ever will be, IMO.