Lightsol
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2005
- 5,415
- 3,424
You are aware we don't have a first rounder thanks to Babcock's obsession, Patrick Marleau, right?I wouldn’t mind a top 10 pick if Shanahan doesn’t fire him.
You are aware we don't have a first rounder thanks to Babcock's obsession, Patrick Marleau, right?I wouldn’t mind a top 10 pick if Shanahan doesn’t fire him.
It's Babcock. As I've said before, Babcock seems to be a good coach for teams where the general talent difference between lines 1 and 4 isn't that high, because it plays to his "we have to keep all line time even" strategy.So is that Babcock or the talent?
I checked out the tweet and there is 1 like by a guy named Brian....are we talking about the tweet above that talks about Shanny that has 140 likes? seems like nobody really checked or I am not understanding something. Did he like it and then remove the like perhaps?
You are aware we don't have a first rounder thanks to Babcock's obsession, Patrick Marleau, right?
Fans of other teams like to claim they tanked for Matthews, but they rarely got blown out and lost most games by a goal or two. The effort was there.
That looks bad.Yes, he liked it (I follow him and saw it) and has since removed the like.
It is possible that the like was accidental. Not common, but I have accidentally liked a tweet before, especially when on my previous phone. I don't recall Keefe ever liking a tweet that was negative towards Babcock before - and there are plenty of those on twitter.
Babcock will be the sacrificial lamb, but Shanahan and Dubas bear equal responsibility.
They built a soft team and went against the established formula.
You sure? When I go on Keefe's likes, it's not there anymore.That looks bad.
I checked out the tweet and there is 1 like by a guy named Brian....are we talking about the tweet above that talks about Shanny that has 140 likes? seems like nobody really checked or I am not understanding something. Did he like it and then remove the like perhaps?
The tweet is no longer liked by Keefe.
Smart thing to do for Keefe. They probably said to him "umm Sheldon maybe not the best idea".Yea unliked now.
Great. Maybe the Leafs brass does follow this forum for pr purposes and reached out to him to have a talk. Timing coincides way too well with the discussion here.
I think we are in a Pittsburgh Penguins type situation, where they switched from Mike Johnston to Mike Sullivan and saw an immediate improvement
including two cups.
Babs is not the right coach for this team, and will be gone by season's end.
Marner and Matthews have totally given up on him, and if they don't want Babs, it's a lot easier replacing him than our star players.
It was probably unintentionalSmart thing to do for Keefe. They probably said to him "umm Sheldon maybe not the best idea".
Surprised he did it in the first place. The rest of his activity is professional.
It was probably unintentional
Babcock. He can't work with skilled teams.
Did you see the results in years he didn't coach? Canada clearly isn't an automatic for gold at these things. Funny thing about Babcock, he's had success at all levels with a variety of skill levels. He's won Olympics with all star teams and made a Cinderella run like we saw in Anaheim.Did you see the scores in those games he won back to back golds? We had the best talent by a country mile and we won by 3-2 score... boring games that should never have been close to begin with. If he needs a literal all star team to win with and not just a good talented team...then yes I stand by my post.
Honestly, our fourth line has played way too close to our first this year. Wouldn't say our ice time is "even" or that he's rolling lines either.It's Babcock. As I've said before, Babcock seems to be a good coach for teams where the general talent difference between lines 1 and 4 isn't that high, because it plays to his "we have to keep all line time even" strategy.
Our first line doesn't show up in big games.Honestly, our fourth line has played way too close to our first this year. Wouldn't say our ice time is "even" or that he's rolling lines either.
I think we are in a Pittsburgh Penguins type situation, where they switched from Mike Johnston to Mike Sullivan and saw an immediate improvement
including two cups.
Babs is not the right coach for this team, and will be gone by season's end.
Marner and Matthews have totally given up on him, and if they don't want Babs, it's a lot easier replacing him than our star players.
Kinda my point, they've been too close from a quality of play levelOur first line doesn't show up in big games.
So we're upset about our 13th forwards being too small?