Does anyone recall Joe specifically discussing last night on the broadcast how the Bruins veteran players are eminently coachable? It was a weird thing to say, not something you usually here emphasized about a solid veteran team.
Was Joe inadvertently airing some dirty laundry? Between that comment, and GG’s comment, are things finally coming to a head with Bread?
The guys just does whatever he wants. It rarely works. He’s fond chemistry with what, two players in this organization, both of which aren’t here anymore (Strome and Fast)?
We need to find a way out of this contract. I’d prefer to reserve judgment on GG after seeing the team perform with guys that are bought in and willing to play his style.
Possibly, but it's an interesting take by him to cite Boston when just last year there was a mini-mutiny brewing if Cassidy was brought back to now they're "eminently coachable."
And yes, I tend to have not liked most of the coaches the Rangers have had over the years. My standard is Bowman. Just like my expectation is to be a serious Cup contender that's down to the Final 4 every year, and not to shoot ourselves in the foot, and if we can't have that, to be actively building towards that, and willing to take the growing pains that entails.
Outside of 2014-15, and a month pre-COVID in Spring '20, I've not seen this team look like that.
For a team predicated on, "Just make the playoffs and anything can happen," it's important to note 2011-12 where literally everything went exactly the Rangers' way, and they still couldn't make the finals. Won practically every 1 goal game all year. #1 seed in the playoffs. All the top teams eliminated by underdogs for them. Literally the easiest seeding draw in NHL history #1 East vs. #8 East, then #7 East, then #6 East, then would've been #8 West in the Finals...and they didn't even make it out of the third round. THAT was your one-in-a-million, "this is our year" scenario where we "just got in" and everything went rihgt, and it still didn't happen regardless. Last year was close too. Two third string goalies in the first 2 rounds? Still won in 7 in both and benefitted from Trouba wrecking Crosby. Then go up 2-0 against a rusty Tampa team, and have a Game 3 lead? Yes, please. And what happened next?
Even if they'd won, still would've required MacKinnon and Rantanen to collide in Cup Finals Game 1, Kadri to do something to get suspended, and Landeskog to suffer one of his myriad injuries in the Finals to (maybe) get over the hump.
NYR's is not a Cup winning organizational philosophy.
I'm tired of building for a longshot, and I want a team that will build for a dynastic perennial contender...and that means a coach who will not sabotage seasons like Torts did by grinding against 8 seeds for 7 games that we should've destroyed in 5. A coach not like AV who will stubbornly cling to Staal/Girardi even after the triplets have teabagged them for 6 games. A coach not like GG who will sabotage his own lines to reward grinders with more ice time, or to "balance" what is already an indequate level of scoring.
Would rather take Coach Q and see what he can do, as well as let him get the opportunity for a second chance and to try to make amends for what was undoubtedly and awful decision on his part. But, the man can coach, and that incident should be a big asterisk on his career for sure, but I hate to see things like that come to define people who aside from that haven't generally been assholes.