ijuka
Registered User
- May 14, 2016
- 23,264
- 16,488
Slafkovsky's hands are better than Pulju's, Pulju's skating was better.
But, Pulju at least was somewhat dominant in Liiga. Slafkovsky was not. He was barely a third liner.
But, Pulju at least was somewhat dominant in Liiga. Slafkovsky was not. He was barely a third liner.
Why are you assuming that just because Slafkovsky won't be a superstar, that draft won't have a superstar?Put me on record that this kid is going to be a beast by 25. He's a teenager and shows glimpses of his talent more and more often.
He likely never reaches the lofty point totals of other first overalls, but I think people need to get past that. Not all draft years have a superstar, it is what it is - but it doesn't mean that his only outcomes are superstar or bust.