I am still confused as to why the coaches started Skinner vs. Minnesota. In what was basically a "scheduled loss", and at a crucial time in the season (Oilers behind the 8-ball again, 4 regulars out with injury), why start the mis-designated top guy who has been crapping out this season and always looks like a sieve vs. Minny?
Cal Pickard was drafted 49th overall; Stu Skinner was drafted 78th. And it's not like Skinner is at some higher level of performance than Pickard (more like the opposite this season).
The Oilers' org seems to have this weird habit of doubling down on their own mistakes, seemingly intent on not "losing face" rather than actually doing what's best for the club. It's like they screwed up massively with Jack Campbell (well, Holland did anyway, but who knows who advised him), and they tried for 2 years to play him just to prove he could do it... then finally, gave up and realized he couldn't (AHL, then buy-out). With that egg on their faces, they then decided Stu Skinner is their franchise goalie of the future, despite nothing in his pedigree or actual play suggesting this at all. It's fairly clear right now that Pickard is outperforming Skinner, so why not just go with the hot guy? Answer: The Oilers want to prove to everyone that they're right and to justify Skinner's elevated status as an apparent #1. They'll do this at the expense of wins.