Confirmed Signing with Link: [SJS] Mikkel Boedker (4 years, $4M AAV)

Limekiller

Registered User
May 16, 2010
3,886
514
SF Bay Area
He'll have better talent around him in San Jose, but it's not like he played with nobody here either. Boedker usually played with Vermette who has been a solid contributor every season except last. Vermette's play rocketed right back up to his normal levels too last year once Boedker was moved.

And for the shooting percentage, it's not a regression to the mean issue. He absolutely goes into a crazy funk almost every single year. You can't just add 5 goals to that because it always happens.

3 more years:

We've had Marleau here for almost 20 years. Streaky scorers are kind of our thing.
 

Captain Timo

Registered User
Dec 4, 2015
2,319
1
He did match a career best in points (51), but every other season he's been a ~30 point player. He shouldn't get that much, unless he makes an impact elsewhere.

He's been a ~50 point player more than he has a ~30 point player. Two seasons he played 48 (lockout) and 45 games (injury) and put up 26 and 28 points respectively. Those are 48 and 47 point paces, respectively.
 

Limekiller

Registered User
May 16, 2010
3,886
514
SF Bay Area
Simply bad at ice hockey. Don't get the appeal.

Why not wait and see how he does on a team where he is a purely complementary piece, and not "The Guy"? he doesn't have to handle ANY of the heavy lifting here he had to do in AZ or CO, since we have Thornton, Couture, Pavelski, etc. to do that. I think that lessening of responsibility (plus a lot less time having to play against top comp) will make a big difference for him.
 

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
147,982
126,775
NYC
Why not wait and see how he does on a team where he is a purely complementary piece, and not "The Guy"? he doesn't have to handle ANY of the heavy lifting here he had to do in AZ or CO, since we have Thornton, Couture, Pavelski, etc. to do that. I think that lessening of responsibility (plus a lot less time having to play against top comp) will make a big difference for him.

Hopefully it'll help him do something above a 4th line level at even strength.
 

XX

Waiting for Ishbia
Dec 10, 2002
54,965
14,757
PHX
Why not wait and see how he does on a team where he is a purely complementary piece, and not "The Guy"? he doesn't have to handle ANY of the heavy lifting here he had to do in AZ or CO, since we have Thornton, Couture, Pavelski, etc. to do that. I think that lessening of responsibility (plus a lot less time having to play against top comp) will make a big difference for him.

I don't get why all the blame is placed on "Arizona is a bad team." Boedker has been tried in every role and was most useful as a 3rd line streaky winger. He's simply not a top 6 player you want to count on. If anything, he should have stood out on a bad Arizona team. Instead, he shriveled up in a contract year and was a big part of the team being bad. Domi and Duclair outplayed him.
 

Alberta Yote

Owns the Yotes
Dec 31, 2004
14,436
1,212
In your kitchen
Inconsistent yes but you could always see the potential. I might be one of the few Coyote fans that want to see him actually finally get it together. He was never going to do it in Arizona.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,559
15,231
Folsom
I don't get why all the blame is placed on "Arizona is a bad team." Boedker has been tried in every role and was most useful as a 3rd line streaky winger. He's simply not a top 6 player you want to count on. If anything, he should have stood out on a bad Arizona team. Instead, he shriveled up in a contract year and was a big part of the team being bad. Domi and Duclair outplayed him.

It'll depend on who his linemates are going to be. If he's going to be on the wings of the Joes, possession numbers aren't going to be a problem. If they move Hertl back to 3C and put Boedker with him, Hertl's good at driving possession and will be a mismatch against practically any 3rd line in the league. If he's playing with Marleau, possession probably won't be great but they should be solid defensively and play a pretty good transition game. I don't expect his production to go up any but if he is able to bring in 50 points a year, that's fine regardless of whether it's streaky.
 

DonskoiDonscored

Registered User
Oct 12, 2013
18,641
9
Hopefully it'll help him do something above a 4th line level at even strength.

OH NOES! His advanced stats are bad! I haven't watched him and I just saw his hero chart but his advanced stats are bad! What a bad signing!

I'm optimistic. If it turns our 2nd PP unit into a lethal one it is a win.
 

do0glas

Registered User
Jan 26, 2012
13,271
683
I don't get why all the blame is placed on "Arizona is a bad team." Boedker has been tried in every role and was most useful as a 3rd line streaky winger. He's simply not a top 6 player you want to count on. If anything, he should have stood out on a bad Arizona team. Instead, he shriveled up in a contract year and was a big part of the team being bad. Domi and Duclair outplayed him.

Boedker was Arizonas top scorer 5v5 13/14. Only played 45 games but was on pace to lead them again 5v5 in 14/15.
 

Alwalys

Phu m.
May 19, 2010
25,894
6,140
He'll have better talent around him in San Jose, but it's not like he played with nobody here either. Boedker usually played with Vermette who has been a solid contributor every season except last. Vermette's play rocketed right back up to his normal levels too last year once Boedker was moved.

And for the shooting percentage, it's not a regression to the mean issue. He absolutely goes into a crazy funk almost every single year. You can't just add 5 goals to that because it always happens.

Luckily we have a guy who can feed him slam dunks to get him going. :laugh:
 

bleuetbio

Registered luser
Nov 13, 2008
3,560
690
Montreal
I came here to write that he's the steal but reading you guys, it seems he's nothing more than a vomit bag.

Im pretty surprise
 

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
147,982
126,775
NYC
OH NOES! His advanced stats are bad! I haven't watched him and I just saw his hero chart but his advanced stats are bad! What a bad signing!

I'm optimistic.

I know everyone likes to make fun of the HERO charts, but shouldn't production be higher than between "4th line" and "3rd line" on the chart for 4 million dollars?

The charts aren't made up, they're based on you know, actual production.
 

DonskoiDonscored

Registered User
Oct 12, 2013
18,641
9
I know everyone likes to make fun of the HERO charts, but shouldn't production be higher than between "4th line" and "3rd line" on the chart for 4 million dollars?

The charts aren't made up, they're based on you know, actual production.

I use hero charts all the time.

What you''re doing is using a chart to replace viewings. You can't come to a conclusion based on that.

That's what I'm saying.

If he puts up 40+ points this is a great contract.
 

XX

Waiting for Ishbia
Dec 10, 2002
54,965
14,757
PHX
What you''re doing is using a chart to replace viewings. You can't come to a conclusion based on that.

I assure you the viewings were a lot more depressing than the charts, especially last year. DeBoer + Jumbo should get him going, or nothing will.
 

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
147,982
126,775
NYC
I use hero charts all the time.

What you''re doing is using a chart to replace viewings. You can't come to a conclusion based on that.

That's what I'm saying.

If he puts up 40+ points this is a great contract.

He might because he's unbelievable on the powerplay. Nobody will deny that. But you have to put up with him being a traffic cone at even strength. Not worth 4 million for me, but if you think a PP specialist is what the Sharks are looking for, then may the force be with you.
 

DonskoiDonscored

Registered User
Oct 12, 2013
18,641
9
I assure you the viewings were a lot more depressing than the charts, especially last year. DeBoer + Jumbo should get him going, or nothing will.

I'll see for myself, thank you very much. I understand if you have ill will towards Boedker because he couldn't be "The Guy". I understand that this probably tainted your viewing of him as a whole.

He will be a 2nd/3rd line complimentary piece in San Jose.
 

DonskoiDonscored

Registered User
Oct 12, 2013
18,641
9
He might because he's unbelievable on the powerplay. Nobody will deny that. But you have to put up with him being a traffic cone at even strength. Not worth 4 million for me, but if you think a PP specialist is what the Sharks are looking for, then may the force be with you.

If he puts up 40 points period it is a great deal. He can be sheltered at even strength so he doesn't have to do the heavy lifting away from the puck.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,559
15,231
Folsom
I assure you the viewings were a lot more depressing than the charts, especially last year. DeBoer + Jumbo should get him going, or nothing will.

If his 50 point pace seasons are him not going, it'll be interesting to see if he gets going. I mean, I get that some guys play worse than their points suggest but at the end of the day, those points are what wins games and makes you money.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad