violaswallet
Registered User
- Apr 8, 2019
- 9,174
- 8,361
Maybe but it is a 3M dollar his and we are a taking 1M back!I think the getting cap space makes it like that giving how much of a premium it is at this point
Maybe but it is a 3M dollar his and we are a taking 1M back!I think the getting cap space makes it like that giving how much of a premium it is at this point
I'm hearing Evgeni Nabokov is going the other way.
We didn't have 4M+ to throw at Graves. We had to sign multiple D because Ek and Montour are gonna miss the start of the season. Mikkola is a decent gamble. He had a good season last year, finally became a regular and played very well for the Rangers. He'll likely play on 2nd pair with Montour, that's what Monty needs someone who stays back, takes care of his own end, blocks shots. Mikkola is trending up while Kuli is trending down. OEL will be lucky just to re-establish himself as a solid nhl D. Right now Mikkola has the edge with his last season.Where did I say Kuli is a stud?
Exactly with Kuli& OEL Mikkola is completely useless, they all should be fighting for the #3LD position on a good team and you don’t spend 2.5M on Mikkola when you have zero cap space.
3 players for same role, zero for the actual role they needed
Jeff Jillson and Jim Fahey?Dimitrakos too.
For what? He can LTIR Ek and Monty if necessary. Or make one or more moves. I’m not gonna freak on day one, especially when we got Tkachuk later on.Where did I say Kuli is a stud?
Exactly with Kuli& OEL Mikkola is completely useless, they all should be fighting for the #3LD position on a good team and you don’t spend 2.5M on Mikkola when you have zero cap space.
3 players for same role, zero for the actual role they needed
Where is he going to find the cap?
Nope, went from Lorentz to Lorentz. It was never one for one on a possible Hanifin deal. If anyone believed that they’re dumb.From hanafin to Lorentz lol
Duke had a very good 2021 season as well.Risky move you mean, seeing as how Duclair has done that one time, on a much better and more offensively inclined team, with better supporting players, while being younger, and at least one less injury on his body.
On top of that risk, we are trying to be bad, if Duclair does rebound and turn into a good player, that could actively hurt the Sharks tanking, especially if we cannot find a taker for Karlsson. Looking at last year, getting contributions from guys like Karlsson, Meier, Reimer etc, are the sole reason we were not the worst team in the NHL.
Right now, we are on paper the worst team in the NHL, I see no valid reason to attempt to change that for the off chance that Duclair has another career year and can be flipped at the deadline for hopefully more than we trade to get him in the first place.
Risky move you mean, seeing as how Duclair has done that one time, on a much better and more offensively inclined team, with better supporting players, while being younger, and at least one less injury on his body.
There's gotta be more going to Florida. If not, that's a terrible return for them.
BertuzziCap space.
When a trade appears lopsided in terms of on-ice talent, look at the cap implications.There's gotta be more going to Florida. If not, that's a terrible return for them.
He missed all of last year and wasn’t good in the playoffs, I’m fine with cap space and a sizable bottom 6er.There's gotta be more going to Florida. If not, that's a terrible return for them.
Duke had a very good 2021 season as well.
Well everyone played half a season that season.Half a season**
Again, not only do we have to hope he has a rebound year after missing the majority of the last one, we also have to hope he can stay healthy which he has done.....exactly once, so that we can actually have the chance to get some assets at the TD.
Bertuzzi