GDT: Sir Svechy and his band of merry Hurricanes face off against the villainous band of the knights of gold

[AhosDatsyukian]

why do we always seem to get f***ed over by early whistles and NEVER benefit from them?

 

[DaveG]

This crew has been f***ing terrible

 

[Nikishin Go Boom]

Are we incapable of elevating the puck? Jesus

 

[cptjeff]

Screwed by a quick whistle, why am I not surprised?

 

[Svechhammer]

Yeah tell me again that we get an even shake by the refs

 

[Wolfpuck]

This crew has been f***ing terrible

I’m sure we’ll get them for every game in the playoffs.

 

[Tryamw]

Are we incapable of elevating the puck? Jesus

No.. We got the shot to the Moon down pat.

 

[Surrounded By Ahos]

This crew has been f***ing terrible

 

[Anton Dubinchuk]

Yeah tell me again that we get an even shake by the refs

Is it Luxemore tonight?

I don’t buy the grand conspiracy, I do buy that Luxemore hates our guts for whatever reason.

 

[Svechhammer]

This crew has been f***ing terrible

Happens so f***ing often against us

 

[The Faulker 27]

Have they considered elevating the puck.

 

[Svechhammer]

Absolutely zero chance this kind of refereeing shithousery happens to a big market team. And if it did, it would be a major story in the league for a week

 

[Wolfpuck]

Have they considered elevating the puck.

Considered and dismissed.

 

[Tryamw]

Have they considered elevating the puck.

Well they have 2 modes.. Shot for the FG or along the ice..

 

[Sens1Canes2]

The comment “if you can’t rely on a goaltender to make a save you’re not an NHL goaltender” in response to saying “not every goalie is going to make every single big save” is ridiculous. Vasilevsky gives up over 2 goals per game. Your comment - “the D really needed Vasilevsky to bail them out there” - could be applied to any single goal he gives up.

The 2nd goal was not a soft one in the slightest. It was a high, high danger one because his dman completely shit the bed. Your argument for criticizing him, that he has to make a save because his dman screwed up and gave up a high danger chance, is bad. The two alternatives to that line of reasoning are “no goal is acceptable to give up” (which, combined with your “not a starting goalie” comment would mean you think there are no actual starting goalies in the NHL), or “goals are only acceptable when your defense doesn’t screw up”, AKA soft goals, which you’d also (rightly) criticize.

I assumed you were trolling because the comment reads like a troll post. But I should know better than to engage with you in GDTs. You become a different, much less rational poster lol.

I don’t like posts … consider this, that.

 

[Wolfpuck]

deHaan waits until the lane closes lol

 

[Tryamw]

So Is Quick's chest protector about to break? if not this will be a long night..

 

[surfzone365]

I guess we better learn to put pucks through goalies rather than around/past them.

 

[Wolfpuck]

Holy f*** f*** these refs in the eye.

 

[AhosDatsyukian]

worst reffing I've seen all year

 

[dogbazinho]

Guess no makeup calls.

 

[Svechhammer]

Lol ok so tackling is allowed

 

[The Faulker 27]

I don’t like posts … consider this, that.

 

[cptjeff]

This crew has been f***ing terrible

 

[dogbazinho]

I don't know how players don't shoot pucks at officials.