The way I see it, without being privy to insider knowledge or medical records, is that Iginla is the safest bet to draft a top 6 player. Not the most talented, strongest or biggest. Just a good player with a great shot, intensity, professional mentality and work ethic. You can question his ceiling, but he's also one of the youngest in the draft and the next 6 months could see a massive leap in development, just like Sennecke in the second half of the season (although his was understable with adjustments to his growth spurt).
Demidov has the highest ceiling, and he has to be the pick at 5 if available
Lindstrom and Sennecke have high ceilings, but they come with higher risks as well. I agree with a poster saying that Sennecke always does the same deke, although that's just highlight packages... I admit to not seeing full games of his.
So it boils down to what the consensus will be at the Habs final draft meeting. Will they take the safe approach, or swing for the fences? If Demidov is gone, the safe pick would be Iginla. The obvious choice is Lindstrom if he's there at 5. If not, will they go for Sennecke if they feel development will make the question marks go away?
Aside from Demidov, my head tells me Lindstrom, but my gut still tells me Iginla. For me, he has that "it" factor.
That being said, I would be happy if we draft any of them.
"If" it goes down to drafting a top 6 forward or nothing, let's say with Demidov/Lindstrom already gone at Habs pick, me too it would be Iginla.
Personally, I don't embark into Sennecke's train wagon.
I've watched a few games more of him, because I was wondering if I missed something before, and there was such a buzz around him, but never I was impressed.
Yes he makes spectacular plays, but where is his consistency?
I mean, in terms of effort deployed, in terms of concentration to details, in terms of playing 200' hockey, it's very, very inconsistent. He's very raw and immature.
And I haven't seen him transport the puck with fluidity. He's good passed the opposing blue line but when it comes to skate with the puck to bring it there, he seems to slow down too much with it.
And even his highlight plays, that amaze so much people and make them think that this player have such a high ceiling, aren't that much translatable to the NHL, IMHO.
Pure junior stuff.
Dipsy doodling between opposing defenders skates is cute, but as far as I'm concerned, he's too tall and lanky, and far from being fast enough, for those kind of plays to succeed in the NHL for him.
Plus if he tries to do that regularly in the NHL, he's gonna pay the price big time. Good luck with his head health.
He's no Patrick Kane...
It reminds me of the Mathias Norlinder case, where Sweden biggest pom pom girl, Brexel, was selling him like he was the second coming of Lidstrom/Hedman all wrapped in the same player ..
The guy was dipsy doodling around in the Allsvenskan and everybody was in awe because of it.
But anybody that analysed it one bit knew that he wasn't fast enough nor strong enough to duplicate it in higher levels, notwithstanding in the NHL...
For me, Iginla plays a kind of game that translate a lot more to the NHL.
Add his natural athleticism, strength, bloodline and basic skills (shot, skating, etc..) and you have more or less a 30ish goals 20ish passes mini power forward (let's say as a medium range expectations).
He's the typical guy that you love to have comes the playoffs.
He's a natural for playoff hockey = straight to the point and powerful. Not flashy but efficient.
Sennecke, for me, is a project that have too much uncertainties to put a 5th overall on him.
It's all about projections with him. Very high risk high reward kind of pick in the top 5.
IMHO, probability of him reaching up what some see in him is not high enough to pick him that early.
But the jury is out for him, he's a very polarizing prospect, some love him and others don't.
P.S.: everything that I said is my opinion only, sure I could be very very wrong. And it won't be the first time nor the last...
And I can live with that