I wouldn’t give more than 11, so I already know I won’t be a happy camper no matter what happens. lol! I’ll just have to grin and bear it and carry on. GLG!Even you said no more than 11. It won't be but it needs not to be close to 13 for me.
I wouldn’t give more than 11, so I already know I won’t be a happy camper no matter what happens. lol! I’ll just have to grin and bear it and carry on. GLG!Even you said no more than 11. It won't be but it needs not to be close to 13 for me.
I don't get the desire to keep an aging player for several more years. Again, if the team could sign him for two years, no problem I'm on board. But anything longer than that wouldn't make sense to me.sign Mitch , let Tavares walk
JT has been in the league 16 yrs and has only had one good playoff series , that's should be a large enough sample size for people to realize we shouldn't bring him back .
without Marner we probably don't even make the playoffs next year
They just keep the cash flowin it is all profit run it backNever wrestle in the mud with a pig because you’ll get dirty and the pig will enjoy it.
That's why they should just give them both what they want now. Why bother waiting to see if they do anything in the playoffs. We all know they won't.
Despite that they'll demand to be paid like champions.
This organization epitomizes a losing culture. The only person of significance held accountable for poor performance has been Keefe. The players are continually rewarded with raises regardless.
Lack of accountability breeds a culture where results aren't important.
They should make the postseason every year with this core and that's all that matters. In their eyes so long as they're in the playoffs they can continue to call themselves a contender. Dressing up the failure in attempt to hide the stink.
Putting wings on a pig won't turn into an eagle.
Could be a Tanev LTIR contract that keeps the cap hit down. If he hits 35 goals, he probably can get $6+m on the open market. I'd offer $7m+6m+5m, spread it over 6 years and hope to get two good years before he goes LTIR. Like some keep saying, the cap is going up as well.I don't get the desire to keep an aging player for several more years. Again, if the team could sign him for two years, no problem I'm on board. But anything longer than that wouldn't make sense to me.
Agree completely on JT, the Stamkos/TBay analogy seems like a good one. He wants to stay here, so take a bit less money. And he was so lucky to get that last contract before covid hit so hopefully he'll keep that in mind and not be greedy.It 100% depends on what they're asking for now.
If JT is asking for market value, then it's a no now and will stay that way. I dont think he's brought back unless it's a good deal for the Leafs and they should therefore be fine to wait it out if that's not an option. It'll be a less severe version of the Stamkos/TBay discussion where he'll definitely be able to get a higher avg somewhere else if he wants to leave.
For Marner, it also depends on the ask; however, he likely has more power the longer this drags out given there will be no shortage of teams offering him a truckload of money if he becomes a UFA. Another poor playoff showing might dissuade the Leafs from offering him top dollar, but there will be plenty of other teams still eager to pay him thinking it's a collective Leaf team issue rather than just him.
He can't get an 8th year once he becomes a UFA. Leafs are the team that can pay him the most so unless he is like JT and wants out, and is willing to leave money on the table. I doubt that is in his DNA.It 100% depends on what they're asking for now.
If JT is asking for market value, then it's a no now and will stay that way. I dont think he's brought back unless it's a good deal for the Leafs and they should therefore be fine to wait it out if that's not an option. It'll be a less severe version of the Stamkos/TBay discussion where he'll definitely be able to get a higher avg somewhere else if he wants to leave.
For Marner, it also depends on the ask; however, he likely has more power the longer this drags out given there will be no shortage of teams offering him a truckload of money if he becomes a UFA. Another poor playoff showing might dissuade the Leafs from offering him top dollar, but there will be plenty of other teams still eager to pay him thinking it's a collective Leaf team issue rather than just him.
With you there. They need to prove it to get paid top dollarHell no. Don't sign anyone before playoffs.
If we lay another egg get eliminated in the first round. What will it be this time? Goaltending? Defence???
Tavares is pretty durable. I can't imagine he is an LTIR risk at any point in the next few years.Could be a Tanev LTIR contract that keeps the cap hit down. If he hits 35 goals, he probably can get $6+m on the open market. I'd offer $7m+6m+5m, spread it over 6 years and hope to get two good years before he goes LTIR. Like some keep saying, the cap is going up as well.
Will got UFA money plus the 8th year and full NM until retirement. Why would Mitch expect any less when he will be an an actual UFA ? When Shanny said everything is on the table he was referring to every dollar the club has in order to keep the band together.He can't get an 8th year once he becomes a UFA. Leafs are the team that can pay him the most so unless he is like JT and wants out, and is willing to leave money on the table. I doubt that is in his DNA.
Will got UFA money plus the 8th year and full NM until retirement. Why would Mitch expect any less when he will be an an actual UFA ?
But if you put wings on a boar... that would be realy dangerous. To bad all we got is a piglet.Never wrestle in the mud with a pig because you’ll get dirty and the pig will enjoy it.
That's why they should just give them both what they want now. Why bother waiting to see if they do anything in the playoffs. We all know they won't.
Despite that they'll demand to be paid like champions.
This organization epitomizes a losing culture. The only person of significance held accountable for poor performance has been Keefe. The players are continually rewarded with raises regardless.
Lack of accountability breeds a culture where results aren't important.
They should make the postseason every year with this core and that's all that matters. In their eyes so long as they're in the playoffs they can continue to call themselves a contender. Dressing up the failure in attempt to hide the stink.
Putting wings on a pig won't turn it into an eagle.
This. Oh, this.This question really comes down to: are you happy with the status quo or not? The answer for a serious franchise contender should be a resounding no
I've always felt the leverage over JT is generally under appreciated. Start negotiations off with a pay by the drink approach, one year at a time, and at a discounted rate.I don't get the desire to keep an aging player for several more years. Again, if the team could sign him for two years, no problem I'm on board. But anything longer than that wouldn't make sense to me.
"If the number is right" but it won't be. He's not going to keep signing 5M 1Y contracts until his play falls off just as a favour to the team.I'd put pen to paper for Tavares any time he wants. If the number is right, then the timing doesn't matter too much to me.
"If the number is right" but it won't be. He's not going to keep signing 5M 1Y contracts until his play falls off just as a favour to the team.
The max I would offer JT is the Tanev contract (6yr/4.5m aav), otherwise tell him to take a hike.