I was a big markov fan, but since you are using norris trophies as a metric in your post, I will say Weber was alot closer than markov.
He lost a couple close norris races, and one of them was closest race of all time where he barely got beat out by lidstrom.
He was a lock to play on the best on best Canadian teams among guys like Keith and doughty as well.
I don't use overrated and underrated terms because everyone is basing the benchmark on their own perceptions, but it should not be a controversial take to say thay he was an excellent dman in his era.
Weber's a legit HOFer, that's why he's going in first ballot. Maybe a little overrated in the sense that he wasn't really mobile or great with puck control. But he did some things very, very well. That shot lands him in elite company for goals by a blueliner. And he was really good at clearing the crease. Strong in his own zone without the puck. 5 times top five in Norris and runner up twice. 16th all time in goals. No brainer.
I've spoken about Markov before, not a HOFer. Hall of the very good. Funny but he's the opposite coin of Weber. Everything Weber was excellent at Markov wasn't great. But Markov had vision like few bluelieners and his passing was spectacular. He wasn't a rushing blueliner either but great vision. Much better than Weber in that respect.
Sidenote: Price should go in next year but unfortunately it's a really crowded field. Chara, Getzlaff, Thornton, Price and Keith. Rask is also eligible. Only four get in. Really tough year... he may have to wait. Getzlaf is probably his best shot. Price has better Hart placements but a shorter career. Getlaf has a cup... only three seasons in top ten points.