Shea Theodore Out Until Playoffs

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
I don't see the issue, Vegas isn't breaking any rules.

They either are breaking rules, or it's a freak coincidence that every single season they have an expensive player that has an injury heal at the precise date of the first day of the playoffs.

Not a week before, not a week after, the exact date of Game 1 they are ready. 3 years in a row.

So yes, odds are they are breaking rules, but nobody at the league office is at all interested in doing anything about it.
 
It’s just taking advantage of the rules. I actually don’t like it and I wish they’d find a way to get rid of this, but in a super hard cap league people will always pull every string they can.
 
They either are breaking rules, or it's a freak coincidence that every single season they have an expensive player that has an injury heal at the precise date of the first day of the playoffs.

Not a week before, not a week after, the exact date of Game 1 they are ready. 3 years in a row.

So yes, odds are they are breaking rules, but nobody at the league office is at all interested in doing anything about it.

There is no requirement that when an injured player becomes healthy, they immediately are placed on the active roster from LTIR.

I myself believed the opposite, until a while ago in one of these threads someone posted actual evidence from the CBA/Rulebook.
 
...Chicago did it; won Cups...Tampa did it; won Cups...Vegas did it; won a Cup...now they want more...

hate-the-game.gif
 
There is no requirement that when an injured player becomes healthy, they immediately are placed on the active roster from LTIR.

I myself believed the opposite, until a while ago in one of these threads someone posted actual evidence from the CBA/Rulebook.

There is no requirement they need to be placed on the active roster, but they are not eligible to be on LTIR such that cap space continues to accrue if they are healthy and fit to play.

If a guy is 100% healthy on April 1st they can't just keep him on LTIR until Game 1 three weeks later.

BTW - would be happy to be proven wrong, but I'm nearly dead certain this is the case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Canadienna
There is no requirement they need to be placed on the active roster, but they are not eligible to be on LTIR such that cap space continues to accrue if they are healthy and fit to play.

If a guy is 100% healthy on April 1st they can't just keep him on LTIR until Game 1 three weeks later.

BTW - would be happy to be proven wrong, but I'm nearly dead certain this is the case.

I believe you are wrong. I also would be willing to see evidence to the contrary.

This has been hashed out before, but never addressed specifically by anyone at the league.

The relevant section is Article 50.10 d) iv) Page 290 of the CBA.

There is a requirement that a player must be deemed unfit to play to be placed on LTIR, and a requirement that once the player is returned to the active roster, the team must be cap compliant.

But there is no restriction on a team regarding when they are required to return a fit to play player to the active roster.

From that section

"A Club may then exceed the Upper Limit due to the addition of replacement Player Salary and Bonuses of Players who have replaced an unfit-to-play Player, provided, however, that when the unfit-to-play Player is once again fit to play, the Club shall be required to once again reduce its Averaged Club Salary to a level at or below the Upper Limit prior to the Player being able to rejoin the Club."

Note that they specifically mention that when a player is once again fit to play, the team must become cap compliant before they can bring him back. NOT that the team must bring him back immediately, or are not cap compliant the moment he becomes fit to play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Czechboy
I believe you are wrong. I also would be willing to see evidence to the contrary.

This has been hashed out before, but never addressed specifically by anyone at the league.

The relevant section is Article 50.10 d) iv) Page 290 of the CBA.

There is a requirement that a player must be deemed unfit to play to be placed on LTIR, and a requirement that once the player is returned to the active roster, the team must be cap compliant.

But there is no restriction on a team regarding when they are required to return a fit to play player to the active roster.

From that section

"A Club may then exceed the Upper Limit due to the addition of replacement Player Salary and Bonuses of Players who have replaced an unfit-to-play Player, provided, however, that when the unfit-to-play Player is once again fit to play, the Club shall be required to once again reduce its Averaged Club Salary to a level at or below the Upper Limit prior to the Player being able to rejoin the Club."

Note that they specifically mention that when a player is once again fit to play, the team must become cap compliant before they can bring him back. NOT that the team must bring him back immediately, or are not cap compliant the moment he becomes fit to play.

The section you cited doesn’t say anything about being on the active roster. If they are fit to play the team must be cap compliant.

You can not be on an active roster and still be subject to the salary cap.
 
So change the rules: If a player is on LTIR within 30 days before the first day of the playoffs they are ineligible to return until the 2nd round.

Will teams abuse it...probably. But they'll really have to think about it now (to say nothing about the player who is ok with taking time off in the regular season but wants to be there in the playoffs)
Union would never approve of that.
 
They either are breaking rules, or it's a freak coincidence that every single season they have an expensive player that has an injury heal at the precise date of the first day of the playoffs.

Not a week before, not a week after, the exact date of Game 1 they are ready. 3 years in a row.

So yes, odds are they are breaking rules, but nobody at the league office is at all interested in doing anything about it.

You can't LTIR just for the sake of doing so. The league has to sign off on it. If there were actually rule breaking and the league discovered that the team is misusing it the league will punish the team. So you can't say the league just will ignore it.
 
You'd be stupid not too. And most people here are just salty their favorite team's GM is too stupid
Really grateful my favorite team broke through without needing to exploit that loophole. Would never hear the end of it if that was the way Ovi & the caps finally won.. same with Toronto’s core 4
 
"I believe you are wrong. I also would be willing to see evidence to the contrary."-person who keeps on going, I certainly don't care enough.

I hope Theodore gets better but it's suspicious as always when Knights players go on LTIR.
 
They either are breaking rules, or it's a freak coincidence that every single season they have an expensive player that has an injury heal at the precise date of the first day of the playoffs.

Not a week before, not a week after, the exact date of Game 1 they are ready. 3 years in a row.

So yes, odds are they are breaking rules, but nobody at the league office is at all interested in doing anything about it.

If every team is allowed to do it, and they are then Vegas isn't breaking any rules.

Even if they were who cares it works.

But since every team is allowed to do it they aren't.

I'm surprised they haven't been defering money when doing contract extensions.

That would be a Vegas thing to do but Carolina did it first, then Toronto did it with McCabe.

So far Vegas hasn't done it which surprises me.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad