Church Hill
I'd drink it
- Nov 16, 2007
- 17,817
- 2,809
Kane with 4 points (1+3) in this game, his 3rd back from suspension. First start of the game. Market value heating up, get him cheap while you still can.
Kane with 4 points (1+3) in this game, his 3rd back from suspension. First start of the game. Market value heating up, get him cheap while you still can.
I heard he helped a little old lady cross the street and then tossed the dog a boneWhat are his public image stats?
Kane for Skinner straight up.
Kane to 3rd team at 50% for a modest pick and/or/roster player to help with possible short term cap considerations.
The Sharks get rid of Kane and get a player on a worse contract, keep their assets.
Sabres get out of Skinner deal and retain 3.5mil on Kane for say a 5th.
3rd team takes Kane at 3.5 for 3years for a 5th.
The deal doesn’t happen for the Sharks or Sabres without the 3rd team ( Kane and Skinner agreeing). So the incentive is riddance for Sharks, nice savings for Sabres.
More scouts at the AHL game today.
Kane with three assists and a goal
I heard he helped a little old lady cross the street and then tossed the dog a bone
I heard he helped a little old lady cross the street and then tossed the dog a bone
More scouts at the AHL game today.
Kane with three assists and a goal
Winnipeg scouts were there?? Certainly not for Kane .... right?
Kane @ 50%
to Toronto for:
Engvall, Ritchie + Amirov
Kane @ 50%
to Toronto for:
Engvall, Ritchie + Amirov
More scouts at the AHL game today.
Kane with three assists and a goal
That would be hilariousBring him back to Winnipeg!
It's amazing how many fans who bitch and complain about what a terrible person Kane is, want him. They keep coming up with insane ideas where they get paid to take him on at 50% (or even 75%) retained. Safe to say that won't happen. We're better off keeping him. People can stop making proposals that have no benefit to the Sharks - were not in the business of shooting ourselves in the foot to make another team better.I like how for a week or two we've shown what buy out results look like for the Sharks, and how it's very reasonable to move forward with, without us giving up an asset in a trade, yet fans come in and ask for us to retain money and give up a pick/player.
If you don't want him because he's a headache, then great we won't trade him to you. He's fine sitting on our AHL team until June, when we can buy him out and most of the years are at 1.6M.
Kane @ 50%
to Toronto for:
Engvall, Ritchie + Amirov
Kane to Buffalo... o% Retained
Nothing goes back to SJ.. just salary dump to Buffalo who picks up his full salary.
More scouts at the AHL game today.
Kane with three assists and a goal
Old gang together. Eichel, Kane , Lehner.Could see him on Vegas
I wonder if the Sharks would have success putting him through waivers again
It's amazing how many fans who bitch and complain about what a terrible person Kane is, want him. They keep coming up with insane ideas where they get paid to take him on at 50% (or even 75%) retained. Safe to say that won't happen. We're better off keeping him. People can stop making proposals that have no benefit to the Sharks - were not in the business of shooting ourselves in the foot to make another team better.