They have 11 UFA's with two extra slots and his ELC would be two years. I get that it's not the most efficient use of a contract but it's hardly something to get terrified over.
Well then it's certainly a bad look that I used that word without later making it explicitly clear that it was intentional hyperbole for effect...
Because if I had done that it would've rendered that whole issue moot, and it would make continued references to that word choice look weirdly focused on needless vocabulary pedantry rather than any sort of real and substantive debate.
But that would be silly...
And....
Well then it's certainly a bad look that I used that word without later making it explicitly clear that it was intentional hyperbole for effect... I suppose I could've also relied on the fact that my known taste for flippant and at times artificially and non-seriously trumped up statements would be enough for people to judge the intent of the post rather than just the literal wording and understand that the word was meant to be taken in a less-than-sincere manner. But I guess that's also on me for expecting that nobody would make a mountain out of a inconsequential and tangential mole hill.
Because if I had done that it would've rendered that whole issue moot, and it would make continued references to that word choice look weirdly focused on needless vocabulary pedantry rather than any sort of real and substantive debate.
But that would be silly...
The scounting report reads very similar to how I view Knyzhov lol.
*re signs in Allsvenskan for 5 more years *Time for Dahlen to finally take the next step.
Islanders just signed a KHL rfa for this season only. I assume that means Dahlen can be signed the same
This may be wrong but Dahlen is listed as reserve list on capfriendly for some reasonNot likely. I believe the distinction is that Jonathan Dahlen is an RFA. Golyshev was on the reserve list as a prospect they drafted and hadn't signed an NHL contract.
This may be wrong but Dahlen is listed as reserve list on capfriendly for some reason
Yeah thats why I was confused why they could sign an older guy now and he can play. Maybe because hes never had a NA contract thoughI would guess that's just where they're putting RFA's from this past off-season who haven't signed yet. February 11th was the last day an RFA was eligible to sign and still play this season.