Goddammit, I thought I'd deleted my post before anyone had a chance to point out my error, lol.
My new take: the first tweet doesn't represent what Jarvis will actually receive in each contract year, but for cap purposes each year it does include the calculated value of the amount that will be paid in July 2032 for each respective year it was deferred from (in order to reflect the correct cap hit).
E.g., on a 1 year contract, let's say option 1 is a $2m salary with a $1m SB. Instead, they agree to a $2m salary but defer the SB to the day after the contract expires. They adjust the SB to $1.05m (or whatever the formula is) to make up for the $ lost by not giving him the SB until a year later. So even though the player will receive a total of $3.05m, the cap hit will be $3m, the same as if they didn't defer the SB.
If I'm correct, without knowing the formulas used, you can't really reconcile the amounts across the 2 tweets because you don't know what proportion of the SB has been deferred from a particular year. Of course, I might not be correct, lol.