Yeah the refs played it safe and left it open for the team to challenge. It was a tough call for the bench because by the word of the ruling it’s a good goal, but by the consistent application of the rule by the ref it would be called back.
I've kind of flip flopped on this one, at first I though whatever it saved me the time of a pointless review, but after seeing the wording of the rule, Idk whether or not this actually should have been waived off or not, my feeling after reading it is the intent of the rule is to be a bit more along the lines of a kicking motion level of subjectivity where the contact with the glove actually has to significantly impact the play.
Ideally, the refs stick with what they saw on the ice and the original call, let the Bruins challenge it. The one refs view was clearly obstructed, the other and linesman were 40+ feet away and possibly obstructed, it never would have been blown dead on a hand pass had there been no goal and play continued, so why they decided to determine after the fact that for the purposes of a review, it was called a hand pass on the ice idk. Video replay is there for a reason, either it was clear and you shouldn't need it, or it was close and you let the challenge happen to confirm or deny you're original call.