Barsky
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2010
- 280
- 163
Equivalent counter: Greig and Ostapchuk for Suzuki. Does that seem like reasonable value to you?Guhle and Mailloux for Sanderson.
Equivalent counter: Greig and Ostapchuk for Suzuki. Does that seem like reasonable value to you?Guhle and Mailloux for Sanderson.
Lawson Crouse for Shane Pinto?
that might get you pinto and formentonGuhle and Mailloux for Sanderson.
lol @Samhockey3 with the laughing emoji.I don’t see the need to trade a core player.
They are tied for third in xGA%
Tied for first in HDCA
Huge improvement in those numbers compared to previous seasons.
Probably Norris and Zub I’d say.the idea is to shakeup the bffs core that has been here the longest to change the dynamic. trading fresh face pinto doesn't change anything.
its Chabot, Brady, Norris, or Batherson.
This is Chabot's 8th year and Brady's 7th. We aren't young, just immature.I would keep them intact, Sens core is very, very young. They just need to gain alot more experience before becoming contender, thats all it is to it.
Just like the sabres old core, or pre mcdavid edmonton coreI would keep them intact, Sens core is very, very young. They just need to gain alot more experience before becoming contender, thats all it is to it.
I don’t think Chabot gets you as much as you think. Injury prone, not amazing defensively and getting $8 mil for 3 years after this oneThey should have kept Chychrun and traded Chabot. Been saying it the entire time.
Pinto or Norris makes the most sense after him.
Sure this hoss!Equivalent counter: Greig and Ostapchuk for Suzuki. Does that seem like reasonable value to you?
Crouse and Stauber for Norris and Sogaard?the idea is to shakeup the bffs core that has been here the longest to change the dynamic. trading fresh face pinto doesn't change anything.
its Chabot, Brady, Norris, or Batherson.
Yeah, trading from their good, young core would be a big mistake.No they don't, what a stupid thread
Tkachuk would look great on the Avs lineup and i'm sure Colorado would listen seriously
Crouse and Stauber for Norris and Sogaard?
This is unhinged and Toronto would be instantly much worse.Marner and a 1st for Tkachuk.
Or
Matthews and a 1st for Timmy.
Leafs win the cup easily.
That’s how I felt two years ago when people were talking about the core needing a shake up to get over the hump. But then I stuck it out, blamed the goalies and coaches for two more years giving the core a few more chances and now it’s just obvious that this group together isn’t working.Yeah, trading from their good, young core would be a big mistake.
Progress doesn't always come in straight lines, but Ottawa is definitely a team on the way up. We just don't know when exactly they will take off, but it will happen soon.
You keep banging that Zub drum. I know he hasn't been great this year, but it's still the position of biggest need in the org. Why do you think him, genuine question. Ya, Yak looked great in a tiny sample, but they would absolutely need a Zub replacement in the short term at least or it would be a big step backProbably Norris and Zub I’d say.