OT: Sens Lounge -The four seasons edition

[mysens]

Switzer sauced GTR

Oh nice! Do you have any pics?!

 

[AchtzehnBaby]

Perfect proof that we are being manipulated by reptilian alien beings. It's a documentary on YouTube so of course it is 100% fact. Wake up, sheeple.

Reactions | Chemtrails | Season 5 | Episode 4 | PBS

Airplane contrails happen when burning jet fuel meets the chemistry of air.

www.pbs.org

pbs = facts

The "Chemtrails" conspiracy theory holds that condensation trails are full of other chemicals that scientists and governments are seeding into the atmosphere

Lufthansa pilots don't lie™

 

[ACLEVERNAME]

 

[maclean]

It's actually very useful for how tos.

I know plenty of people who use YouTube when working on things...like doing their cars brakes or something.

That is also a fair point. I'm perhaps slowly adjusting and there are definitely cases where having that visual is very useful, but I sometimes still get frustrated when all I want is a normal textual explanation and all the internet will find me is videos and I just feel like "I could read this faster than you can explain it to me".

 

[ACLEVERNAME]

Just Google "Chemtrail" and pay attention to the results. Pattern recognition.

'Conspiracy theory', 'experts', debunked', 'truth'. Repetition and reward is how man will train the beast but are we not 'beasts' ourselves? Are you a free thinking man or are you a dog trained to sit and speak as you are commanded? The truth may surprise you.

Just look up once in a while and ask yourselves...

 

[coladin]

Switzer sauced GTR

Fuuuuuuck . Sounds like a 10 second car

 

[Tnuoc Alucard]

Religion? Religion is based on faith. No, I follow the facts, the fact is around 99% of peer reviewed studies conclude man caused climate change to be true, while a small group of those who often have conflicts of interest and or financial interests in denying climate change are out there denying those facts.
There's one person in this conversation that is putting their faith into something that just hasn't been backed up by the evidence here, and you might be shocked to find out it not the one who's position aligns with 99% of the scientific papers on the subject.

More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change | Cornell Chronicle

More than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is mainly caused by humans, according to a new survey of 88,125 climate-related studies.

news.cornell.edu

Again, more proof you did not bother to watch the documentary….. that is filled by data based evidence, and NOT on computer modeling that the man made alarmists base their claims on.

I guess Patrick Moore (co founder of Greenpeace),Professor Sallie Baliunas of Harvard and the Smithsonian, Noble laureate Dr John Clauser, Dr Stephen Davies institute of Economic Affiars, Professor Will Happer of Princeton, Professor Steven Koonin, Metrologist Professor Dick Lindzen of Harvard and MIT, Dr Roy Spencer of NASA and the leader of their Aqua Satellite US Science team or even Professor Henrik Svensmark of the National Space Institute don’t know what they’re talking about……. But all those scientific papers written by those funded by the IPCC do, eh?

 

[Micklebot]

Again, more proof you did not bother to watch the documentary….. that is filled by data based evidence, and NOT on computer modeling that the man made alarmists base their claims on.

I guess Patrick Moore (co founder of Greenpeace),Professor Sallie Baliunas of Harvard and the Smithsonian, Noble laureate Dr John Clauser, Dr Stephen Davies institute of Economic Affiars, Professor Will Happer of Princeton, Professor Steven Koonin, Metrologist Professor Dick Lindzen of Harvard and MIT, Dr Roy Spencer of NASA and the leader of their Aqua Satellite US Science team or even Professor Henrik Svensmark of the National Space Institute don’t know what they’re talking about……. But all those scientific papers written by those funded by the IPCC do, eh?

So compelling is their evidence that .01% of experts agree!

The nice thing about actual experts doing actual research is their work gets peer reviewed. Youtube videos, not so much... (unless you count the links I provided and you obviously didn't read, I guess those reviewed their "work" and provided detailed responses to the numerous claims made in the film)

It's nice that you can list off a handful of people who support your position (most of which who's credentials don't actually align with the subject matter) but if I were to do that for the other side we'd be here all week just typing off their names and credentials.

So yeah, I'll go with peer reviewed science rather than youtube clips, but you do you.

 

[BonHoonLayneCornell]

Again, more proof you did not bother to watch the documentary….. that is filled by data based evidence, and NOT on computer modeling that the man made alarmists base their claims on.

I guess Patrick Moore (co founder of Greenpeace),Professor Sallie Baliunas of Harvard and the Smithsonian, Noble laureate Dr John Clauser, Dr Stephen Davies institute of Economic Affiars, Professor Will Happer of Princeton, Professor Steven Koonin, Metrologist Professor Dick Lindzen of Harvard and MIT, Dr Roy Spencer of NASA and the leader of their Aqua Satellite US Science team or even Professor Henrik Svensmark of the National Space Institute don’t know what they’re talking about……. But all those scientific papers written by those funded by the IPCC do, eh?

Anyone can make a documentary look believable if they don't have to back any of it up with peer reviewed science.

 

[StoicSensFan]

Fuuuuuuck . Sounds like a 10 second car

 

[Icelevel]

The thing is whether you believe/they are chem trails or con trails (water is a chemical btw) what is left in the sky is a grid pattern that spreads and blocks the sun out.
This has HUGE ecological implications.

Separately if there are harmful chemicals involved then obviously that’s another big concern.

But bad enough, what is undeniable is that we end up with the sun being blocked out with unnatural machine created “clouds”.

Humans rarely look up though.

 

[AchtzehnBaby]

https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2012/04/27/delgado-china-cloud-seed.cctv

Always look up

The thing is whether you believe/they are chem trails or con trails (water is a chemical btw) what is left in the sky is a grid pattern that spreads and blocks the sun out.
This has HUGE ecological implications.

Separately if there are harmful chemicals involved then obviously that’s another big concern.

But bad enough, what is undeniable is that we end up with the sun being blocked out with unnatural machine created “clouds”.

Humans rarely look up though.

 

[AchtzehnBaby]

 

[PlayersLtd]

Fuuuuuuck . Sounds like a 10 second car

You rang sir?

Work in progress but future 9 second car. Although 1/4 mile times are not my focus at all, but it should be pretty fast in all applications.

 

[ACLEVERNAME]

Boomers who spend thousands of dollars a year spraying and spreading weed killers and insect repellent near their water source and onto their vegetable gardens will call you a 'conspiracy theorist' for noticing the clouds don't look right these days.

My neighbour who 'votes green' and still insists on watering down his driveway every week lol.

We're f***ed, lmao

 

[StoicSensFan]

You rang sir?

Work in progress but future 9 second car. Although 1/4 mile times are not my focus at all, but it should be pretty fast in all applications.

View attachment 850767


View attachment 850774

Whatcha got under that tarp there? a 7 second car?

 

[Neil Patrick Harris]

Boomers who spend thousands of dollars a year spraying and spreading weed killers and insect repellent near their water source and onto their vegetable gardens will call you a 'conspiracy theorist' for noticing the clouds don't look right these days.

My neighbour who 'votes green' and still insists on watering down his driveway every week lol.

We're f***ed, lmao

Bruh, I just entered this topic and all I've seen so far is people talking chemtrails mixed with people talking about their project cars. This is the boomiest page I think I've *ever* seen on HFBoards I haven't felt this confused since I got a Raelian ad on Facebook.

Thank you, ET, for giving us so many delicious animals!

 

[AchtzehnBaby]

incredible

 

[Tnuoc Alucard]

Anyone can make a documentary look believable if they don't have to back any of it up with peer reviewed science.

Obviously you also did not watch it…. And it is cram packed with historical records, reputable data and more.


The Movie features a series of interviews of prominent and credentialed scientists, including Steven Koonin, NYU professor and former Assistant Secretary of Energy in the Obama administration; Richard Lindzen, retired atmospheric physicist from Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Roy Spencer, meteorologist at the University of Huntsville in Alabama and an award-winning veteran of NASA; Willie Soon, an astrophysicist and aerospace engineer at Harvard and the Smithsonian; and others, some of whom were blackballed for daring to challenge the prevailing climate change group-think narrative.

Another major feature of the film is data. How warm is the planet today compared to previous decades, centuries, and millions of years ago? Based on rock formations, temperature can be estimated going back as long as 500 million years. At the present day, it turns out Earth is in a colder period than the planetary norm. Measured over thousands of years, the climate has been quite stable, ranging within a few degrees, and now in an overall warming trend by about one degree since the late 1800s, during which average global temperature has varied modestly up and down.

Another key data point is the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which was four and five times higher than the levels of today, at 2,000-plus parts per million, including during ice ages. Yet, such realities have eluded climate obsessives like John Kerry and countless others who assert that nameless scientists warn of exceeding 400 parts per million means the planet is headed to a proverbial danger zone.

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) (2023) ⭐ 6.7 | Documentary

1h 20m

www.imdb.com

 

[Golden_Jet]

Again, more proof you did not bother to watch the documentary….. that is filled by data based evidence, and NOT on computer modeling that the man made alarmists base their claims on.

I guess Patrick Moore (co founder of Greenpeace),Professor Sallie Baliunas of Harvard and the Smithsonian, Noble laureate Dr John Clauser, Dr Stephen Davies institute of Economic Affiars, Professor Will Happer of Princeton, Professor Steven Koonin, Metrologist Professor Dick Lindzen of Harvard and MIT, Dr Roy Spencer of NASA and the leader of their Aqua Satellite US Science team or even Professor Henrik Svensmark of the National Space Institute don’t know what they’re talking about……. But all those scientific papers written by those funded by the IPCC do, eh?

One in a thousand Scientists agree with you.

 

[Tnuoc Alucard]

One in a thousand Scientists agree with you.

Another one who did not watch the documentary…. And that 97% of scientists claim has been debunked years ago.

https://www.fraserinstitute.org/article/putting-the-con-in-consensus-not-only-is-there-no-97-per-cent-consensus-among-climate-scientists-many-misunderstand-core-issues

Why people believe everything the UN, or any government, says to be true is beyond me….

The Bridge collapse in Baltimore was an accident, right?

 

[BonHoonLayneCornell]

Obviously you also did not watch it…. And it is cram packed with historical records, reputable data and more.


The Movie features a series of interviews of prominent and credentialed scientists, including Steven Koonin, NYU professor and former Assistant Secretary of Energy in the Obama administration; Richard Lindzen, retired atmospheric physicist from Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Roy Spencer, meteorologist at the University of Huntsville in Alabama and an award-winning veteran of NASA; Willie Soon, an astrophysicist and aerospace engineer at Harvard and the Smithsonian; and others, some of whom were blackballed for daring to challenge the prevailing climate change group-think narrative.

Another major feature of the film is data. How warm is the planet today compared to previous decades, centuries, and millions of years ago? Based on rock formations, temperature can be estimated going back as long as 500 million years. At the present day, it turns out Earth is in a colder period than the planetary norm. Measured over thousands of years, the climate has been quite stable, ranging within a few degrees, and now in an overall warming trend by about one degree since the late 1800s, during which average global temperature has varied modestly up and down.

Another key data point is the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which was four and five times higher than the levels of today, at 2,000-plus parts per million, including during ice ages. Yet, such realities have eluded climate obsessives like John Kerry and countless others who assert that nameless scientists warn of exceeding 400 parts per million means the planet is headed to a proverbial danger zone.

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) (2023) ⭐ 6.7 | Documentary

1h 20m

www.imdb.com

Peer. Reviewed. Science. Is. All. That. I'm. Interested. In.

This is nothing but propaganda.

 

[StoicSensFan]

Bruh, I just entered this topic and all I've seen so far is people talking chemtrails mixed with people talking about their project cars. This is the boomiest page I think I've *ever* seen on HFBoards I haven't felt this confused since I got a Raelian ad on Facebook.

View attachment 851029

Thank you, ET, for giving us so many delicious animals!

I really wish they had thread based ignore settings, if I ignore everyone who isn't talking about car stuff the rest of the Ottawa forum will get hidden...

Anyone into motorcycles, dirtbikes, or snowmobiles? Let's get some more machine talk in here

 

[AchtzehnBaby]

I really wish they had thread based ignore settings, if I ignore everyone who isn't talking about car stuff the rest of the Ottawa forum will get hidden...

Anyone into motorcycles, dirtbikes, or snowmobiles? Let's get some more machine talk in here

Norden 901

www.husqvarna-motorcycles.com

 

[ACLEVERNAME]

I really wish they had thread based ignore settings, if I ignore everyone who isn't talking about car stuff the rest of the Ottawa forum will get hidden...

Anyone into motorcycles, dirtbikes, or snowmobiles? Let's get some more machine talk in here

The Garage

Your one stop shop to discuss all your transportation needs and interests. From car repair to how to read a train schedule.

forums.hfboards.com