Proposal: Sens - Avs trade

Boud

Registered User
Dec 27, 2011
13,909
7,513
Let’s make it clear, Ottawa would not do this.

Nichuskin has his own issues. That on it’s own is an issue I don’t think Ottawa can deal with in their locker room. Avs have a strong core and Nichuskin is a great player but the fit is just not there.

Why Girard? Ottawa already has Sanderson and Chabot on the left side… makes no sense. He’s a smaller guy I don’t see Staios being interested at all.

Overall it’s a bad offer that doesn’t really address the holes Ottawa would need to fill.
 

Cypher

Registered User
May 25, 2011
5,292
3,324
Edmonton
avalanche.nhl.com
Tkachuk to the Avs for Nickushkin + Girard + Kovalenko

Would Avs fans do this?

Pass. That's way too much from the Avs.

If you are trading for Nuke, its under the assumption he'll be clean the rest of his contract. Given contracts (term and $/year), Nuke = Tkachuk. Sure you could throw in Kovalenko, but definitely not adding a top4 dman ontop of that, that's crazy.
 

Avs44

Registered User
May 16, 2011
21,894
10,681
We'll even include a year's supply for Nuke too :sarcasm:

I'd do it -- largely because I intensely dislike Nuke and have zero confidence in his ability to stay on the roster moving forward. Doesn't make much sense for the Sens IMO.
 

benfranklin

Registered User
Jun 29, 2024
615
492
Hell yeah from the Avs. I'd kill for either Tkachuk, but to move Nuke potentially quitting on us again at the same time. Huge win.

Value wise though, its pretty solid assuming a sober Nuke, but probably underwhelming from the Sens pov. Quantity > quality.
 

PAZ

.
Jul 14, 2011
17,747
10,244
BC
As good as Tkachuk is and as bad as Nuke's off-ice issues are, this still makes them a worse team (assuming Nuke doesn't get banhammered again).

Now that's a big assumption, but Avs need depth. I'd pass.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Emerica

DingDongCharlie

Registered User
Sep 12, 2010
11,734
9,851
Pass. That's way too much from the Avs.

If you are trading for Nuke, its under the assumption he'll be clean the rest of his contract. Given contracts (term and $/year), Nuke = Tkachuk. Sure you could throw in Kovalenko, but definitely not adding a top4 dman ontop of that, that's crazy.

There's zero way Nuke holds the value Brady holds. That's pure delusion to even suggest it.
 

dirtydanglez

Registered User
Oct 30, 2022
5,466
5,532
this is really bad for the sens.

tkachuk + for extended rantanen
or
tkachuk for 1st, ritchie, +

nuke would make more sense for a player who also comes with baggage like norris.
 

nightonthesun

Registered User
Sep 8, 2013
1,906
2,156
New Jersey
Nuke is so good. Without the drug problems, this is a hard no. But with them in mind: The risk that comes with him makes him a bad trade chip. Then there’s the fact that the Avs need depth, not necessarily star power. This does not help.
 

John Mandalorian

2022 Avs: The First Dance
Nov 29, 2018
11,729
7,442
Not bad value wise. Nichushkin is a very impactful player. He absolutely might be just as impactful as Tkachuk. But the obvious issue is his reliability. So, it seems like Girard is the hedge to offset Nichushkin’s reliability concerns. That doesn’t mean it makes sense for either team but the value seems to make sense.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad