BonHoonLayneCornell
Registered User
Is he really though? Sure doesnt seem to be in Ottawa.Korpisalo would be a good option for 1b with Askarov
Chychrun + Norris + Korpisalo vs Saros + Carrier or Fabbro
Is he really though? Sure doesnt seem to be in Ottawa.Korpisalo would be a good option for 1b with Askarov
Chychrun + Norris + Korpisalo vs Saros + Carrier or Fabbro
They would have Askarov for when his not hotIs he really though? Sure doesnt seem to be in Ottawa.
Not happening without trading Greig/Pinto.
It's an optimistic view, but I don't think Korpisalo can be considered as anything but a major cap dump in any deal. He carries a ton of negative value.They would have Askarov for when his not hot
The problem here , we have two so so goaltending
You exaggerating a lot here. Korpi not that bad and 4m for the coming years with the cap increasing. This is nothingIt's an optimistic view, but I don't think Korpisalo can be considered as anything but a major cap dump in any deal. He carries a ton of negative value.
Just to dump Korpisalo could take the equivalent of what it would cost to acquire Saros.
Saros almost certainly isn't going to want to extend here and Nashville isn't going to take on Korpisalo in the deal without a massive overpayment.
Lot of wishful thinking in this thread.
We are pretty deep in the process of fixing team defense are we not? Especially if Martin stays behind the bench an extra season.
If we make a move to bring in a defensive dman in the summer, and we continue to improve in leaps and bounds as we have been doing, I don't see why we wouldn't bring in a true #1, top-ten goalie.
Of course the question now is what are we willing to part with?
Saros almost certainly isn't going to want to extend here and Nashville isn't going to take on Korpisalo in the deal without a massive overpayment.
Lot of wishful thinking in this thread.
We probably need to add a 2nd or a 1st to the first offer if we are getting them to take korpisoloNot Pinto, Greig our the 2024 first.
Korpisalo (salary purposes), Sogaard/Merilainen, Boston's 1st, Jarventie (+ Sokolov and/or Thomson if they want them)
or
Chychrun + Korpisalo + Boston's 1st for Saros + Carrier
No way I'd pay a king's ransom for a goalie. Next year you have Saros and Forsberg and the year after Saros and Sogaard
This. If Greig, Pinto, and our 1st aren't on the table, we don't have the assets to get this done. And you absolutely don't make this trade if you aren't very certain that Saros is re-upping here.Saaros is one of the few goalies worth trading loads of assets for, but we don't have many assets lol.
We can't afford to trade this years 1st, Greig, or Pinto.
The best we can offer the Preds is Boston/Detroits 1st or next years top 10 protected 1st, Kleven, Brannstrom and a depth guy like Kastelic (Trotz loves these types of guys).
Just don't see having the goods to get Saaros. Not to mention having to extend him lol
The Senators haven't had a goaltender this calibre since Hasek in 2005-6. He's worth going after.Yes, let's ruin yet another goaltender in this league.
Can we fix the overall team defense before we spend a fortune in assets for yet another goalie?
Who says? Players know what's going on here better than the fans. They see the sh*t show the goaltending is and that a great goaltender can immediately add 5 wins or more to this team as it is. The Senators goaltending is gawd awful to the point where their plus 33 goals above expected almost equals the combined total of the next 3 worst teams below them. They are in another universe bad.Saros almost certainly isn't going to want to extend here and Nashville isn't going to take on Korpisalo in the deal without a massive overpayment.
Lot of wishful thinking in this thread.
Buying out Korpisalo is not that expensive at $1.333M per year for 8 years, but is certainly a waste of budget and cap dollars and we would still need to pay a top goaltender.We're stuck with Korpisalo. What it comes down to is what do Andlauer and Staois want to do?
Keep trying to see if he can be that #1 guy and risk team success by not continuing to try and secure a #1 goalie?
Keep him up and deal with $4M in dead cap for a backup goalie? Not the end of the world.
Buy him out? Eat a much lower cap hit for 8 years or whatever it is? And live with that smaller dead cap space?
Bury him in the minors because he's for sure clearing waivers?
We don't have great options here. I think whatever happens you have to look at cycling through goaltenders even if you want to give Korpisalo more chances. You need a backup plan because this season we have seen what happens when you go ride or die with Korpisalo. There has to be competition for the top job, credible competition. And if Korpisalo wins out you keep competition around as your backup plan.
BUYOUT DATE | BASE SALARY REMAINING | S.BONUS REMAINING | YEARS REMAINING | BUYOUT LENGTH | AGE | BUYOUT RATIO | TOTAL COST | TOTAL SAVINGS | ANNUAL COST |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 15, 2024 | $16,000,000 | $0 | 4 | 8 | 30 | 2/3 | $10,666,667 | $5,333,333 | $1,333,333 |
Hahaha you scared me Cosmix. You uploaded this thread and I was thinking we have acquired SarosBuying out Korpisalo is not that expensive at $1.333M per year for 8 years, but is certainly a waste of budget and cap dollars and we would still need to pay a top goaltender.
Cost Calculations
BUYOUT DATE BASE SALARY REMAINING S.BONUS REMAINING YEARS REMAINING BUYOUT LENGTH AGE BUYOUT RATIO TOTAL COST TOTAL SAVINGS ANNUAL COST Jun. 15, 2024 $16,000,000 $0 4 8 30 2/3 $10,666,667 $5,333,333 $1,333,333
Yeah he apparently wants the Sorokin contract. 8 years, 8 million is a lot, not sure I wanna pay a goalie that much for that long, as good as he is.Jaros wants to get PAID, unless we shedding significant salary to extend him, not sure how we get him.
Imagine we pay that type of contract for him to only have him turn into a sieve here because it seems like any goaltender the Sens put in net plays like shit.Yeah he apparently wants the Sorokin contract. 8 years, 8 million is a lot, not sure I wanna pay a goalie that much for that long, as good as he is.