Nikolajs Sillers
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2021
- 4,887
- 3,441
Oops. Donovan, do your homework before a radio interview!
Nobody beats Jonathan Bernier quote about Nelson Mandela
Oops. Donovan, do your homework before a radio interview!
Block chain is great and has many applications. Using it as a means of transfer would very effectively end the need for cheques or swift transfers. Problem is the lack of stability in BTC and other crypto's. You may want to move money through the medium but can't because it might lose or gain significant value during the transfer period.Not sure a background in economics and finance qualifies one as a crypto authority. I have an MBA as well and have only a rudimentary understanding of blockchain technology and cryptocurrency generally. I think one would need to study the subject matter directly and in depth to become an expert.
More regulation is needed. The shitcoin marketplace is a mess and exchanges can’t be trusted as far as you can throw them. Major barrier to greater adoption and utility is a lack of oversight in the space.
Still extremely intriguing tech though. As a lawyer the concept of a smart, self-executing contract is super interesting. And BTC more specifically could take on a sort of “digital gold” profile that’s potentially lucrative coming out of some of the loosest monetary policy in modern history.
Buffet is obviously very rich but the whole “it has no intrinsic value” thing only goes so far. Not very Keynesian of him.
One of the reasons the the whole industry is wrong is its lack of regulation. There may be well intentioned parts & actors but unregulated securities/commodities (jury is still out on crypto) trading will always end up predatory.I want to be clear: I only endorse and support Bitcoin. I do see other use cases, and I like some of the stuff being developed in the crypto space. I also think the DEFI sector will, in time, revolutionize the entire banking industry.
No doubt there are tons of ponzis, rugpulls, and bad people doing bad things, as well as gambling and manipulation. I am not arguing that stuff doesn't exist; I am just saying that to classify the entire industry as such is wrong.
Wasn't he going on and on about attending some PGA thing this weekend? Probably an AI generated article.Anyone of us could have written that. Pure fluff and no substance.
I was honeslty expecting they were taking the long weekend off from talks. Thank god its still moving even if its still at a snails pace.Breaking news
no breaks when negotiating billion dollar dealsI was honeslty expecting they were taking the long weekend off from talks. Thank god its still moving even if its still at a snails pace.
OttawaHow can something be so exciting yet so dull?
it feels like every day has been a holiday tho with the way this has been dragging.no breaks when negotiating billion dollar deals
No. You're totally ignorant of the times. You're either completely 'for' something or 100% against it. Learn the language of the invading force. Might save your headWhile there might be some that fit this description, I really don't think this is fair or apt overall. The timing and randomness of the celebrities, plus the fact that at least Donovan Bailey has minimal knowledge of the Sens, is plenty of reason to be dubious without jumping to racism.
this guy super pro Andlauer tho.
so depends who you ask if its good news. Majority of the fan base wants Andlauer. My rankings are.
Steve Apostolopoulos
Kimmels Ft the Weeknd
Michael Andlauer
so to me it would suck.
Without having a clue about the groups and partnerships, arena plans, actual bid structures (cash vs debt) or planned hockey ops structure I’m wondering how anyone can have a preference.this guy super pro Andlauer tho.
so depends who you ask if its good news. Majority of the fan base wants Andlauer. My rankings are.
Steve Apostolopoulos
Kimmels Ft the Weeknd
Michael Andlauer
so to me it would suck.
No one really knows.Steve is the one with the deepest pockets...right?
That's what we need.
Obviously you can have a preference of which celebrities you want attached to the team....Without having a clue about the groups and partnerships, arena plans, actual bid structures (cash vs debt) or planned hockey ops structure I’m wondering how anyone can have a preference.
Steve is the one with the deepest pockets...right?
That's what we need.
Team selling for less than 600m was a fact here until it wasn't. Lets just wait and see what happens maybe?Why?
Do you assume an owner with "deep pockets" is going to sugar daddy the franchise?
Anyone, with "deep pockets" became that way, by turning a profit on their investments, not by throwing money at something for the fun of it. Sure there may be a short term influx of cash on the operating budget, but with every other business, there will be a budget to fit the market place, based on ROI.
Do not expect a new owner, with "deep pockets" to come into this small Canadian market, with everything that makes it NOT like toronto or Montreal, and expect to be on par with those markets, it's not going to happen.
Why?
Do you assume an owner with "deep pockets" is going to sugar daddy the franchise?
Anyone, with "deep pockets" became that way, by turning a profit on their investments, not by throwing money at something for the fun of it. Sure there may be a short term influx of cash on the operating budget, but with every other business, there will be a budget to fit the market place, based on ROI.
Do not expect a new owner, with "deep pockets" to come into this small Canadian market, with everything that makes it NOT like toronto or Montreal, and expect to be on par with those markets, it's not going to happen.