I'm glad you pointed that out and how important he has been. I assume you're referring to the fact the team puts him on the ice to protect a lead and he's rewarded with the clinchers?
He's earned his ice time too. Did you not expect he would get more ice time? I imagine that even with another top 6 C he'll still get more ice time. He isn't perfect and he's had some clunkers - everyone does - but he's been nothing short of a great off season addition.
Sigh. I knew this “pivot” was going to be used - it always is. People say it about Nyquist.
The whole “coach trusts him to protect a lead” narrative is so overblown.
Playing against an empty net Kuraly is 38% in the face off dot, leads the team in giveaways (only 2), and a 22% Corsi (behind Domi & Laine). GF% of 69…. nice.
He gets ice time because he can sometimes win face offs, and always skates hard. Like I said he’s been fine, but he’s a fourth liner on good teams (and right now is taking away developmental minutes from younger guys).
He has been better than I thought he would though.
Look at the ice time and value provided.
Now if you want to say that the coach trusts Kuraly, Texier and Robinson together as a line, maybe I’d buy that. Robinson and Texier have not conceded an empty net goal, and have been on the ice for 6 goals for. Texier CF% 41%, Robinson 32%.