pc_md
Registered User
- Jun 3, 2006
- 538
- 58
Muskegon (Pitlick) vs. Chicago (Farrell) right now. After one period, it's tied 1-1. Farrell scores his 9th of the season:
Meanwhile, Stapley was a scratch today for Denver. I hope it's due to injury, because last game, even though he got an assist in the game, he was listed as 4C. So I don't know if he's getting demoted or if he's not 100% healthy and he was sheltered last game on the 4th line and tonight a scratch or if he is in the doghouse (which would surprise me).
I was a bit disheartened to find out Farrell's 19. I'm still liking what I'm seeing but it's hard to gage in this league for a 19y/o
I will wager the average age of the league is a bit higher this year with a few more 19 years olds in itI was a bit disheartened to find out Farrell's 19. I'm still liking what I'm seeing but it's hard to gage in this league for a 19y/o
I will wager the average age of the league is a bit higher this year with a few more 19 years olds in it
I was a bit disheartened to find out Farrell's 19. I'm still liking what I'm seeing but it's hard to gage in this league for a 19y/o
Drafted players usually turn 19 in their draft year. He turned 19 on November 2nd.
I was a bit disheartened to find out Farrell's 19. I'm still liking what I'm seeing but it's hard to gage in this league for a 19y/o
I was a bit disheartened to find out Farrell's 19. I'm still liking what I'm seeing but it's hard to gage in this league for a 19y/o
I don't really think the early birthday thing is too much of a guage on players future. Unless he has the third year of junior before draft. Seems to help defensemen moreHe's a November birth, so he's on average about 6 months older than the 18 year olds of his draft year, and on average about 6 months younger than the 19 year olds of the previous draft year. It is what it is. I wouldn't worry too much about the 6 months issue.
Gotta be happy with his play this year even though he didn't get to go to the NCAA. Those numbers are going to give him a lot of confidence.
It's pretty awesome how he was seen as a playmaker but now he's added this pretty damn good wrist shot. I'm bad at evaluating releases and what not but it looks like a pretty lethal wrister all in all.
I'm curious as to how many other 'overagers' are playing in the USHL right now to gage the quality of his opposition. Still I think this kid has potential. I feel pretty confident he'll get a pro contract at least. That might not be a big leap to say at this point lol but again I don't know how his game translates.
He should get a pro contract unless his NCAA career is a burn-out.. but this guy has all the tools, except height, to be a legitimate candidate to develop into a top 6 player.
I'd be happy if one of him or Hillis pans out.. Hillis has gotten really strong in this time off, so I'm looking forward to seeing how he adapts to the AHL. He's always read to me as a player who will get better as he goes up levels as his playmaking is so good, his vision is top notch and the more structured things are and the higher level thinkers he plays with, the more he can create.
Gotta be happy with his play this year even though he didn't get to go to the NCAA. Those numbers are going to give him a lot of confidence.
So hard to be excited for this guy lol, eventually bringing in Caufield at 5"7 is already a risky endeavor, and getting all jazzed up for another 5"9er to make it just feels like going backwards unfortunately