morhilane
Registered User
- Feb 28, 2021
- 10,203
- 13,388
Pattern being that talented small players drop in the draft and get taken in later rounds of course...another small guy... see a pattern here again...
Pattern being that talented small players drop in the draft and get taken in later rounds of course...another small guy... see a pattern here again...
At this point, i think cap space is all you need for Puljujarvi now. Doubt a GM would give assets for him.Farrell will be a key part in the trade that lands us Puljujarvé.
Especially not Farrell lolAt this point, i think cap space is all you need for Puljujarvi now. Doubt a GM would give assets for him.
Especially not Farrell lol
But he was joking i think, because someone said Farrell was another ‘’small’’ player, as if being big (like puljujarvi) makes you any good.
no but again, the habs have had so many smaller players , just saying he is one as wellEspecially not Farrell lol
But he was joking i think, because someone said Farrell was another ‘’small’’ player, as if being big (like puljujarvi) makes you any good.
no but again, the habs have had so many smaller players , just saying he is one as well
I would never, never trade Farrell for Puuljarvi !!!!!Farrell will be a key part in the trade that lands us Puljujarvé.
Their D-corp and goalie were huge though.I think its more about bulk. Tampa wasn't a "tall" team when they won their b2b Cups, but they were "heavy".
And then, I wonder if being heavy really helps with a player's game, vs being an advantage in being more resistant to the wear and tear of an NHL season + playoffs.
Meaning, bulk up Farrell and Caufield to 200 lbs and they'll be absolute monsters
The habs needs more talent, small or big. They will balance it later!Farrell is another small player, we need to find a better balance.
They have four 6’4 forwards as of now, and the defence isn’t small either.Habs are very small and will be smaller in the future. We shouldn't draft according to this specific need, but the Habs will be smaller than they ever were (if possible) in the past, it's gonna be a problem.
Three 6'3" and one 6'4" but your point is madeThey have four 6’4 forwards as of now, and the defence isn’t small either.
If the small players are good, you can always trade them for need after. No one cares about giant 2nd round pick Luke Tuch vs 4th round pick Farrell from same draft.Habs are very small and will be smaller in the future. We shouldn't draft according to this specific need, but the Habs will be smaller than they ever were (if possible) in the past, it's gonna be a problem.
Habs are no longer considered small as they were for many years.Habs are very small and will be smaller in the future. We shouldn't draft according to this specific need, but the Habs will be smaller than they ever were (if possible) in the past, it's gonna be a problem.
Talking about the Prospect pipeline . Smurfs would be appropriate to describe themHabs are no longer considered small as they were for many years.
Their D are all large and can skate (Harris is not overly big).
Up front they have Caufield as smallish but is built like a mini tank.
This team is far from small.
Habs are very small and will be smaller in the future. We shouldn't draft according to this specific need, but the Habs will be smaller than they ever were (if possible) in the past, it's gonna be a problem.
Look no further than Laval .There are Bigger CHL teams than current Laval roster.Another Undersized NCAA no contact league player .
Pass with extreme prejudice.
Talking about the Prospect pipeline . Smurfs would be appropriate to describe them
Don't fall into the trap of getting big player. See Macarron.Habs are very small and will be smaller in the future. We shouldn't draft according to this specific need, but the Habs will be smaller than they ever were (if possible) in the past, it's gonna be a problem.
Yeah, who cares about talent after all, right?Another Undersized NCAA no contact league player .
Pass with extreme prejudice.
Talking about the Prospect pipeline . Smurfs would be appropriate to describe them
Bilodeau, Brad Brown, Michael McCarron anyone?Yeah, who cares about talent after all, right?
Farrell I am sure signs after his NCAA season ends and plays some games in Montreal this year.
I am not sold whatsoever on Struble. 4th year and I just don't see the progression. Maybe it's not about numbers with this kid.I'm sure, as well. Him, Struble & Heineman will be here to end the year.
I am not sold whatsoever on Struble. 4th year and I just don't see the progression. Maybe it's not about numbers with this kid.