Confirmed Trade: [SEA/NYR] Kaapo Kakko for Will Borgen, 2025 3rd, 2025 6th

paragon

Registered User
May 5, 2010
1,825
1,349
I can't understand anyone who says with a straight face that Kakko sucks.

It's obvious that he's a bust. Of course you wish more out of a 2nd overall pick, but he's still a good 3rd liner. His production is not terrible and he's responsible defensively. Anyone with those qualities is a net asset and useful.

I don't believe a word about how this trade wasn't related to his comments. They could have waited for the summer or the TDL and probably gotten more in either case. The return wasn't so great that you couldn't pass the opportunity.
 

Chardo

Registered User
Apr 27, 2007
11,537
7,839
I can't understand anyone who says with a straight face that Kakko sucks.

It's obvious that he's a bust. Of course you wish more out of a 2nd overall pick, but he's still a good 3rd liner. His production is not terrible and he's responsible defensively. Anyone with those qualities is a net asset and useful.

I don't believe a word about how this trade wasn't related to his comments. They could have waited for the summer or the TDL and probably gotten more in either case. The return wasn't so great that you couldn't pass the opportunity.
Nobody drafts at #2 hoping for a good 3rd liner. And it's questionable whether he even is one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gabevh3

Zeeker

Registered User
Feb 15, 2016
3,300
4,766
Lol, the salty Rangers admins took down that Barclay Goodrow thread bump faster than Kakko was kicked out of town for speaking his mind
 
  • Like
Reactions: Svedu

Chardo

Registered User
Apr 27, 2007
11,537
7,839
Happy for Kakko, wish the Flyers could've gotten him.

I think the Rags have the same problem the Flyers do; dinosaur coach
Dinosaur? He just turned 60. And way, way back, all the way last year, won the President's Trophy and lost in the semis to the Cup champion.

It's not questionable. He clearly is a very good 3rd liner. Where he was drafted should be irrelevant to his value at this point. Him being a bust should not lower his trade value one iota.
Very good 3rd liners, or any liners, don't get healthy scratched repeatedly.

Not living up to expectations and sucking are two completely different things.

It's not questionable to say he's a third liner, lol. What the hell
It's not questionable to say he's a third liner. It's questionable to say he's a good one.
 

Brookbank

Registered User
Nov 15, 2022
2,383
2,251
a 6th and a nothing Dman. Whether Kakko goes on to be something or not, that's what the Rangers have to show for a 2nd overall pick.

Going back to Hugh Jessiman in 2003, arguably the most stacked draft of all-time, has any professional sports franchise ever put on such an abysmal display of drafting?

It's a 21 year run of some truly diabolical first round drafting.
Was Kakko the BPA ?
 

Svedu

Registered User
Apr 23, 2019
2,539
1,649
Nobody drafts at #2 hoping for a good 3rd liner. And it's questionable whether he even is one.
LOL! Questionable if he's a good third liner? Just sh*t up already. That's just a delusional statement no matter how someone twists and turns things.
 

Aurinko

Registered User
Apr 1, 2015
3,542
2,357
Finland
I can't understand anyone who says with a straight face that Kakko sucks.

It's obvious that he's a bust. Of course you wish more out of a 2nd overall pick, but he's still a good 3rd liner. His production is not terrible and he's responsible defensively. Anyone with those qualities is a net asset and useful.

I don't believe a word about how this trade wasn't related to his comments. They could have waited for the summer or the TDL and probably gotten more in either case. The return wasn't so great that you couldn't pass the opportunity.

Obvious and obvious bust... He's a solid mid tier player and elite defensively.

2.5M cap hit on a seeminly healthy 23 year old 2-way performer on high value contract means high upside and low downside. There is even a chance he will dust off the bust label by just turning up the scoring. Even if he is or becomes injured, there is a good chance for recovery since he is so young.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Svedu

Joe Sakic

Kaut + 1st
Jul 19, 2010
5,767
1,231
Colorado
It’s a decent gamble for Seattle but you can’t really say “even if” and then describe a player Kakko hasn’t even come close to becoming as if it’s his floor.
Fair point but he has hit 40 points before and likely will this season as well.

At 23 years of age. We’ll see where he is at 26 years old, I venture to guess he’ll be a 50 point player by then.

But your point is fair. Time will tell on this one.

Point being, the kraken gave up nothing for a flyer on a decent player who can improve over the next several years as he begins to enter his prime.
 

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
4,325
3,924
As we explained on the Devils board, it's a combination of a couple things. Anaheim not necessarily wanting to give out a long term deal when they have a bunch of young D who'll need new contracts in a couple seasons. Combine that with Anaheim not exactly being a hot free agent destination. You keep making it seem like they should have been a contender for Brett Pesce if they had offered one more dollar than the Devils. Who else was on the market? Montour? I don't think that's somebody the Ducks wanted a 7+ year reunion.

You even went as far as saying they should have signed T.J. Brodie and Alec Martinez which doesn't seem like a particularly great solution especially knowing that Martinez has missed more than half the season because of injuries. While both have experience playing the right side, Anaheim was looking for a RHD. Trouba fills a spot for the next season+ and Anaheim can likely get much more than the 4th if/when they trade him at next year's deadline.
Except he did want montour and simply failed to make a successful pitch to him.

And trouba is more on the level of Sean Walker, Brendon Dillon, Brodie, Martinez tier than he is the Pesce, Montour tier

"Who was on the market"

This was one of the better RD classes in UFA in a WHILE.
 

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
16,648
11,443
It's not questionable. He clearly is a very good 3rd liner. Where he was drafted should be irrelevant to his value at this point. Him being a bust should not lower his trade value one iota.
You went from good to very good. Next he's a great 3rd liner?

He's a 3rd liner. And currently a replaceable 3rd liner. I think you're being very generous with your "very good." Maybe that changes. Hopefully it does. But it wasn't changing for us.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad