Rather than tanking for 2-3 years and then ascending, Francis doomed them to like 3-4 years of mediocrity, and then a much longer tear down and rebuild.Yeah, it's a strange roster. Almost entirely composed of middle of the lineup guys with an average age of around 30 (Dunn as the exception).
They will be "competitive" but don't have the top-end talent to be anything more than that. Unfortunately as an expansion team they feel the pressure to be good right away, especially after the start Vegas had to their franchise.
But if you just looked at them objectively, you would think they're ready for a rebuild because they're going nowhere fast.
Friedman has mentioned they've got an incredibly expensive ticket price and were starting to lose some STHs. Francis is under direction from the owners to make a splash in the offseason and make the team better. He said this in either the pre or post draft podcast.Rather than tanking for 2-3 years and then ascending, Francis doomed them to like 3-4 years of mediocrity, and then a much longer tear down and rebuild.
I mean, sure. It's from the owners' directive, so he has to go in this direction.Friedman has mentioned they've got an incredibly expensive ticket price and were starting to lose some STHs. Francis is under direction from the owners to make a splash in the offseason and make the team better. He said this in either the pre or post draft podcast.
Are they a playoff team with Stephenson and Montour? The bookmakers don't believe them to be.I said this in the Chandler Stephenson thread. The facts are that the owners almost certainly want the Kraken to:
“Be a playoff team by the time we announce the return of the SuperSonics”. It’s becoming more and more obvious that the Kraken ownership group are the same ones bringing back the Sonics to the NBA and want both teams to be successful and are worried that a poorly performing Kraken will be dramatically overshadowed by a shiny new Sonics.
They aren’t wrong to think that. It’s also not wrong to think that the Sonics announcement is coming sooner than later.
But wait, doesn't Washington state have no income tax? But I was told no state income tax jurisdictions were a huge advantage? Why did they have to pay more??I think everyone including Seattle knows the one big year was probably an outlier. They got him to be a second attacking defenseman who adds that element to the attack to complement Dunn who’s the top dog. Montour is also righty which is also a complement to Dunn being a lefty so he can give another pp unit a different look.
Seattle isn’t a market players are fighting over, so of course they have to pay guys to go there and it’s going to be second tier free agents vs the top ones. I don’t see anything weird about this signing, it’s price appropriate in this market, offense costs money. A market like Seattle will have to pay the extra year and beat everyone’s AAV by a bit. If they want better players it’s this or trades, and trades costs assets that team still needs.
If you don’t know the difference between living off the beach in FLA vs living in the rainy PNW I don’t know what to tell you.Are they a playoff team with Stephenson and Montour? The bookmakers don't believe them to be.
Are they a playoff team with an aging and declining Stephenson and Montour when the SuperSonics start playing again? I think it's likelier than not that the Stephenson and Montour contracts make them worse by that point.
The owners can have their directive. It doesn't mean Francis has to immediately sign idiotic deals.
But wait, doesn't Washington state have no income tax? But I was told no state income tax jurisdictions were a huge advantage? Why did they have to pay more??
HFboards accountants, please solve this for me.
What's that? So other factors could possible matter more than state tax? Wow, that is hard to believe! The HFboards accountants will be so mad!If you don’t know the difference between living off the beach in FLA vs living in the rainy PNW I don’t know what to tell you.
Are they a playoff team with Stephenson and Montour? The bookmakers don't believe them to be.
Are they a playoff team with an aging and declining Stephenson and Montour when the SuperSonics start playing again? I think it's likelier than not that the Stephenson and Montour contracts make them worse by that point.
The owners can have their directive. It doesn't mean Francis has to immediately sign idiotic deals.
But wait, doesn't Washington state have no income tax? But I was told no state income tax jurisdictions were a huge advantage? Why did they have to pay more??
HFboards accountants, please solve this for me.
It's a marginal upgrade in the short-term. By the time the SuperSonics are playing, it's more than likely those deals are cap anchors.To reply about the first question posed. No, I do not think they are a playoff team. That said, absolutely nobody thought the 22-23 Kraken were a playoff team and they not only were, but managed to win a round and take the next round to game 7. The difference between that 22-23 team and this are that Wennberg, Donato, Sprong, Soucy, and Geekie are out, while Montour, Stephenson, Kartye and assumedly Wright and Evans are in. Hakstol is out and Bylsma is in.
I’m not sure about you, but that looks like an upgrade to me. Can they make it work? TBD.
The prudent approach isn't feasible with the Kraken. The sort of veterans who would accept two year deals are not the sort of veterans that will provide sufficient upgrade to satisfy the ownership's desire to ice a "winner," i. e. make the playoffs. But I agree the length of these deals will hurt us in the long run.It's a marginal upgrade in the short-term. By the time the SuperSonics are playing, it's more than likely those deals are cap anchors.
The prudent approach would have been to sign some veterans to short-term deals to stay competitive now, let the young players continue to mature, and not gunk up the cap sheet.
Montour was injured last year so that seems like a big overstatement/leap - he was the #1 d on the team the just won the cupCommitting long term to a severely overrated 30 year old Chandler Stephenson and 30 year old Montour who seems to have totally lost his game.
To reply about the first question posed. No, I do not think they are a playoff team. That said, absolutely nobody thought the 22-23 Kraken were a playoff team and they not only were, but managed to win a round and take the next round to game 7. The difference between that 22-23 team and this are that Wennberg, Donato, Sprong, Soucy, and Geekie are out, while Montour, Stephenson, Kartye and assumedly Wright and Evans are in. Hakstol is out and Bylsma is in.
I’m not sure about you, but that looks like an upgrade to me. Can they make it work? TBD.
This is categorically false. The fact that you confidently claimed this demonstrates how little you know about NHL hockey.Montour was injured last year so that seems like a big overstatement/leap - he was the #1 d on the team the just won the cup
Fair enough. If ownership wanted these specific players/contracts, they can live with the consequences of being locked into mediocrity for half a decade+The prudent approach isn't feasible with the Kraken. The sort of veterans who would accept two year deals are not the sort of veterans that will provide sufficient upgrade to satisfy the ownership's desire to ice a "winner," i. e. make the playoffs. But I agree the length of these deals will hurt us in the long run.
So a teams ice time leader isn’t their no 1 or at worst no 2 D ….and I don’t know hockey. Just get out of here man with these baseless insultsThis is categorically false. The fact that you confidently claimed this demonstrates how little you know about NHL hockey.
Fair enough. If ownership wanted these specific players/contracts, they can live with the consequences of being locked into mediocrity for half a decade+
it was a response to the comment above, he was not our best dman on this team this year.is this supposed to say something about his last few seasons?