Scott Wedgewood injured in pain on the ice. Refs don't blow the whistle. Buffalo scores

GirardSpinorama

Registered User
Aug 20, 2004
21,930
10,904
NHL setting a worse precedent by allowing players to "unintentionally" pile into a goalie's legs just because they were lightly shoved and still allowed to score a goal. Its just really inconsistent with all of the other BS rules around goalie interference.
 

Unspecified

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Apr 29, 2015
6,224
3,107
I don't think anyone is arguing it's goalie interference. Whistle should've gone for an injury. It's not like it would've been a scoring chance had Wedgewood not been injured, the puck was behind the net.
Why penalize the team that was not at fault especially when they are circling the net? Read the posts, lost of people are saying it's the Buffalo players fault.
 

Beerz

Registered User
Jun 28, 2011
37,467
14,196
NHL setting a worse precedent by allowing players to "unintentionally" pile into a goalie's legs just because they were lightly shoved and still allowed to score a goal. Its just really inconsistent with all of the other BS rules around goalie interference.
He was slewfooted lol 😆
 

the_fan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2006
34,382
25,764
In the NHL, players dive to draw a penalty, but have to get up right away if there is no call, otherwise his team will be playing short handed and things happen quickly in hockey. It’s not soccer where the player dives and can stay down for a while. It’s very easy to tell and this was just bullshit where a goalie is clearly hurt and there is no whistle. Make the rule, blow the whistle, it shouldn’t be this difficult
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
87,176
146,387
Bojangles Parking Lot
Never mind the injury and goal, am I the only one who sees some ****ing psychopath throw a puck from the upper deck down into the crowd below?

In the OP video, it shows up at 0:09 and then clearly visible at 1:19.



Imagine watching this play live and then immediately being hit in the head by a ****ing puck thrown from the balcony
 

Freaky Styley

Registered User
Aug 14, 2007
5,374
3,515
redlinerapport.blogspot.ca
Obviously I don't watch every team but it seems there's a lot of strange calls/happenstances in Avs games vs. the rest of the league. And usually not in the Avs favour.

Still hate the offside rule too when it has no bearing on the play, too. Just let the linesman make the calls and fire the guy that made the Duchene call take effect in the first place. Gutsy win by team to battle through that kind of adversity though.
 

EdAVSfan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 28, 2009
7,815
4,979
If the puck makes it out to the point where a slap shot could be zoinked at goalie then yeah..stop it. But a puck behind the net and wrap around isn't going to injure a goalie who is already down
That is an absolutely massive assumption. The reason you’re thinking is this is based on what happened on this goal specifically. What happens if Bensons wrap around gets stuffed and it buys a couple more seconds for more bodies trying to crash the crease to prevent a guy from scoring into an empty net.

I’m not sure what the correct way to call it is. Someone is gonna get screwed no matter. But this type of play is called differently literally every game. There’s too much grey in this rule.

But to suggest that further injury is unlikely to a goalie down in his net because it’s a wrap-around, is nonsense.

I’ve had players fall me so many I’ve lost count when there’s an empty net situation. Players sacrifice their bodies to stop those types of goals. They dive, slide and put whatever they can to stop goals from going in.
 

Cousin Eddie

You Serious Clark?
Nov 3, 2006
40,259
37,680
Why penalize the team that was not at fault especially when they are circling the net? Read the posts, lost of people are saying it's the Buffalo players fault.
Even Bednar said in his postgame that it wasn’t goaltender interference. He just wanted a whistle.
Never mind the injury and goal, am I the only one who sees some ****ing psychopath throw a puck from the upper deck down into the crowd below?

In the OP video, it shows up at 0:09 and then clearly visible at 1:19.



Imagine watching this play live and then immediately being hit in the head by a ****ing puck thrown from the balcony

Could be a hat. Buffalo fans were probably confused by Benson’s celebration and thought it was his 3rd of the game and .
 

Freaky Styley

Registered User
Aug 14, 2007
5,374
3,515
redlinerapport.blogspot.ca
If the puck makes it out to the point where a slap shot could be zoinked at goalie then yeah..stop it. But a puck behind the net and wrap around isn't going to injure a goalie who is already down
To Bednar's point though, if the puck is in the crease and they are banging and it goes in, fine. But if the play goes into the corner, blow it dead when there's an obvious injury like any other player.
 

BagHead

Registered User
Dec 23, 2010
7,338
4,202
Minneapolis, MN
Yeah, this is about where I came down on the matter.

It’s a case where there’s really not a possible call that would satisfy every angle on the play. By the nature of what happened the ref will be screwing one team or the other, no matter what.

I think I’m about 51% on the side of preferring a whistle there, given that the injury was clearly accidental (because no D would do that to his goalie on purpose) and the resulting play didn’t exactly produce a “hockey goal”. If that sequence had led to anything other than a clean wraparound it could have been even worse… imagine a point shot sneaking up underneath Wedgewood’s mask while he’s in that prone position. So I’d like to see a whistle there, but I don’t blame the ref at all for the way he judged it in the moment.
I'm about 51% the opposite way, but I could certainly be persuaded by 2%. Might even just wake up there tomorrow.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: tarheelhockey

Unspecified

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Apr 29, 2015
6,224
3,107
Even Bednar said in his postgame that it wasn’t goaltender interference. Th

i think it’s a hat. Buffalo fans were probably confused by Benson’s celebration and thought it was his 3rd of the game and .
If Bednar is coaching the Sabres he sees nothing wrong with the goal.
 

Beerz

Registered User
Jun 28, 2011
37,467
14,196
To Bednar's point though, if the puck is in the crease and they are banging and it goes in, fine. But if the play goes into the corner, blow it dead when there's an obvious injury like any other player.

I don't agree with that.. and it's not something you see unless it's a face/head shot or cut by skate ect .. injuries happen and was a result of the Avs defender..
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
87,176
146,387
Bojangles Parking Lot
Could be a hat. Buffalo fans were probably confused by Benson’s celebration and thought it was his 3rd of the game and .

That would make sense, but visually it’s 100% a puck.

IMG-8446.jpg
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad