Brian39
Registered User
- Apr 24, 2014
- 7,580
- 14,247
Worth noting that every clip in that video is on the PP except for one play where he recognized that we had one or two forwards going for a change. I don't think that this is really a flaw in evaluating prospect tournaments, but simply the reality of a hockey writer putting together a highlight package of an offensively gifted D man. It's just going to focus on the offensive skill, not the mundane defensive plays/mistakes that will ultimately determine whether he can be good enough as a defender for the good to outweigh the bad.Yeah, this is the problem with prospect tournaments. Some will either just have way more talent and/or much further along in development because of age. Perunovich should be dominating out there, so it's good that he is, but it doesn't really mean much. This tourney did nothing to tell us about his decision making, does he force plays in bad situations because he believes he has the talent to do so, or will he take what the opposition gives him? That's a big difference between the high-end offensive defensemen and the guys that flame out, even if they are productive offensively. Knowing when he can push it and not get burned will be a big factor in his success.
I will say that the 1 non-PP clip we got was a fantastic decision to push the play. His decision to join the rush along the boards opened up the ice and created a clean zone exit rather than a chip to the neutral zone. He drastically increased the chances of a clean line change and did so knowing that if the puck quickly went the other way he would have support coming off the bench. That was the exact time you want an offensive D man jumping up ice.