velimiiro
Guest
canuckerfan said:He has had one good year... don't think that would be enough to qualify.
Brewer basicly had 1 good year too...
canuckerfan said:He has had one good year... don't think that would be enough to qualify.
Kasparov said:Now... i don't know about you guys... but, i think Sheldon Souray would of been a much much better pick. Souray is bigger, he's stronger, he's better offensively he's got a rocket shot, he's great at clearing the crease, good leadership qualities, won't back down vs anyone, and hardly anyone can "outmuscle" him.
I know Hannan is good too... but i think Souray would of been better. What do you guys think?
Boynton could also be put on that list.417 TO MTL said:Hannan, was a very good choice IMO, very underrated player...as for Souray, his time will come as long as he can stay healthy and continue to improve...Aucoin is another very underrated player...
So IMO, out of all the d-men that were named in this thread, the next in line should be...
Aucoin
Rathje
McCabe
Morris
Souray
He's good internationally though...velimiiro said:Brewer basicly had 1 good year too...
MS said:Uh, OK.
Because Aucoin has only been in the top 10 in Norris voting 2 of the last 3 years, something neither Souray nor Hannan has ever been anywhere close to. And he logs more minutes than any defender in hockey outside Pronger and Lidstrom. And he had the best +/- of any Canadian-born defender last year. And he's way better than both Souray and Hannan offensively, and far superior to Souray in his own zone. And he has arguably the best point shot in the NHL. But clearly, he's an inferior player to a journeyman who's played one half-season of high-level hockey in his whole career.
Keep dreaming yourself, homer.
MS said:Uh, OK.
Because Aucoin has only been in the top 10 in Norris voting 2 of the last 3 years, something neither Souray nor Hannan has ever been anywhere close to. And he logs more minutes than any defender in hockey outside Pronger and Lidstrom. And he had the best +/- of any Canadian-born defender last year. And he's way better than both Souray and Hannan offensively, and far superior to Souray in his own zone. And he has arguably the best point shot in the NHL. But clearly, he's an inferior player to a journeyman who's played one half-season of high-level hockey in his whole career.
Keep dreaming yourself, homer.
Westcoasthabsfan said:Well if he was that good then he wouldve been picked right from the start....get over it... The only reason Aucoin logs ice because the ISLES have nobody else.... enjoy another early exit from the playoffs... if they make it thats is.... :lol
MS said:No-one else? They have probably the best top-4 on the blueline in the league!
balddog66 said:I have to agree with a comment that Glenn Healy made, someone clearly doesn't like McCabe on team Canada, he was good enough to finish as the NHLs 4th best defenseman, in Norris voting and allstar team voting, but wasn't one of Canada's top 10 defenseman...while their powerplay is working fine, he would have the best powerpoint shot on the team had he been named now with all the pull outs...
how can people argue that Aucoin, Souray or Rathje are better than McCabe after the season he had? You could argue he wasn't a part of the right mix, but he certainly deserved to be there.
417 TO MTL said:Hannan, was a very good choice IMO, very underrated player...as for Souray, his time will come as long as he can stay healthy and continue to improve...Aucoin is another very underrated player...
So IMO, out of all the d-men that were named in this thread, the next in line should be...
Aucoin
Rathje
McCabe
Morris
Souray
neogeo69 said:Another factor involved in the selections is the amount of Team Canada experience the players had. Brewer, Bouwmeester paid their dues internationally. What is the relative experience for Hannan, Souray, McCabe and Aucoin? I really don't know.
Flames Draft Watcher said:I think that's a HIGHLY dubious statement. If they had the best top 4 in the league they likely would have made it quite a bit farther in the playoffs. Defense wins, the Islanders did not.
neogeo69 said:Another factor involved in the selections is the amount of Team Canada experience the players had. Brewer, Bouwmeester paid their dues internationally. What is the relative experience for Hannan, Souray, McCabe and Aucoin? I really don't know.
MS said:OK, I'll rephrase that ... NYI has probably the most individually gifted top-4 in the league. I'd agree that in a perfect world, they'd probably want one more physical presence and one less all-around skill guy. But I don't think there's another team in the league that can claim to have 4 legitimate #1 or #2 defenders all capable of logging 25 minutes/night. The claim that the initial poster made that Aucoin only logs big minutes because they have no-one else who can handle it is absolute hogwash.
As another poster mentioned, Aucoin spend two full seasons with the Canadian national team and probably has more international experience than any front-line Canadian at any position. Between Olympics, World Championships, World Juniors, and his time with the National team he's played about 150 international games for Canada.